I never said that.TTkickedin wrote:OriginalWheelman wrote:Maybe somebody can make more sense out of these facts and figures than I could
You're saying things like
TTkickedin wrote:I see no reason why it shouldn't be legal here. it can be emissions compliant with enough work.
TTkickedin wrote:So with this information, it shows no modification is needed to make an r34 road legal in terms of safety.
I showed you why you are wrong.
You said it yourself. Could have. But they DIDN'T. That is what matters.TTkickedin wrote:If they can make a vg30dett emissions legal, (bunch of extra systems involved) I'm sure they could've made the rb26 legal.
They also have to look at market trends and profitability. The market data they had said cars like the Skyline sell like crap int he US. And at the time these cars were made, it was true.TTkickedin wrote:Either way you look at it, Nissan is an automotive manufacturer; If they wanted to bring the skyline to the states, they had, from the r32 gt on, a rb26 that they could've experimented with emissions on.
You obviously haven't done a lot of research into this. The information you "are trying to get out there" is unproven, or just false. If you spent the time you spent arguing with me researching the importation laws and the history of the Skyline in the US, you would understand why things are the way that they are. Instead, you are sitting here spouting "Why not!" and throwing around your casual knowledge gained form hear-say, and 5 minute google search with no thought for the credibility of your information. Then, you act victimized when I say your are wrong.

