coupe vs hatchback

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
TheOne
Posts: 1836
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 4:28 pm
Car: 93 240sx FB
Location: Arlington, TX

Post

the hatch/fastback.....cause it looks old and kool specially when you add some kouki taillights.

the coupe looks too ~90's integra.


bryanmenard
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 5:45 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX SE Fastback
2001 Infiniti QX4 4X4
2003 Infiniti QX4 4X4
Contact:

Post

IWannaS15 wrote:Agreed!!

And why do hatch owners insist on calling them 'fastbacks'? Having 'fast' in the name doesnt make it any quicker.
Because that's how they were marketed. Truth be told, I call it both. If someone asks me what kind of 240 I have, I say "fastback." But, in casual conversation, I refer to it as a hatchback.

Also, I think a hatchback better describes a VW Golf or GTI....THAT is a hatch. The 240SX is so sleek....just makes it seem more of a "fast" than a "hatch"

As regards marketing...BMW calls the X5 a "Sport Activity Vehicle" (SAV)...that doesn't mean it's not an SUV...it means that's what the manufacturer calls it. I'm sure there are plenty of pompous X5 owners who insist on calling the car an "SAV"...just like there are plenty of 240SX owners who insist on the "fastback" thing.

GTR
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 5:38 am
Car: 05 Nissan Altima

Post

themadscientist wrote:
I didn't know anyone still spoke martian
LOL, My thoughts EXACTLY!

Florida240sx
Posts: 11114
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 7:17 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX Hatch 5spd
2012 Nissan Altima S coupe 2.5
Location: DeLand FL

Post

Fastbackl/hatchback....who really cares.Was marketed that way but I refer mine as a hatch all the time. I either say hatch or fastback.Is it really worth arguing over? fastback>coupefastback=coupe with silvia frontVert>well vert is in it's own league of hotnessALL S13's>S14's

User avatar
AmoebAssassin
Posts: 2424
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 7:11 am
Car: 1991 Base fastback 5spd, black

Post

The FSM as well as the window sticker that came with my car distinctly says "Fastback." So there. Thats what nissan called it, so thats what i'll call it.

By the way, my heart rests with fastbacks. However, i can definately appreciate a slammed coupe on big wheels. Sexxxay!

User avatar
xckid
Posts: 4697
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 5:52 am
Car: 2004 Chevy Blazer ZR2

Post

Coupe= Silvia conv.

Fastback= S15 con .

Coupes do look wierd with pop ups.

TheOne
Posts: 1836
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 4:28 pm
Car: 93 240sx FB
Location: Arlington, TX

Post

neva though of a fastback with S15 conv......any pics?

dfw240_EE
Posts: 1137
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 2:04 am
Car: 1992 240SX
Contact:

Post

IWannaS15 wrote:Agreed!!

And why do hatch owners insist on calling them 'fastbacks'? Having 'fast' in the name doesnt make it any quicker.
I have a system for what is a fast back and what is a hatchback. Anything with a flat faced hatch (ala Civic hb, Golf, whatever) is a hatch. Anything where the hatch lifts up and the glass is near horizontal is a fastback. Such as late 1960's Mustangs, Corvettes, Integras, 300ZX's, and of course the 240SX hatch. I believe the body style was originally named such in the 60's because it was a significant aerodynamic improvement over the other body styles of the time. The air flowed over the top and was allowed to gently move downward before it got to the end of the car. This reduces turbulence and low pressure behind the car, hence reducing drag.

bryanmenard
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2002 5:45 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX SE Fastback
2001 Infiniti QX4 4X4
2003 Infiniti QX4 4X4
Contact:

Post

dfw240_EE wrote:
I have a system for what is a fast back and what is a hatchback. Anything with a flat faced hatch (ala Civic hb, Golf, whatever) is a hatch. Anything where the hatch lifts up and the glass is near horizontal is a fastback. Such as late 1960's Mustangs, Corvettes, Integras, 300ZX's, and of course the 240SX hatch. I believe the body style was originally named such in the 60's because it was a significant aerodynamic improvement over the other body styles of the time. The air flowed over the top and was allowed to gently move downward before it got to the end of the car. This reduces turbulence and low pressure behind the car, hence reducing drag.
DITTO. MAJOR DITTO

User avatar
sleepy180
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 3:38 pm
Car: 1990 240sx

Post

'nuff said.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

dfw240_EE wrote:I have a system for what is a fast back and what is a hatchback. Anything with a flat faced hatch (ala Civic hb, Golf, whatever) is a hatch. Anything where the hatch lifts up and the glass is near horizontal is a fastback. Such as late 1960's Mustangs, Corvettes, Integras, 300ZX's, and of course the 240SX hatch. I believe the body style was originally named such in the 60's because it was a significant aerodynamic improvement over the other body styles of the time. The air flowed over the top and was allowed to gently move downward before it got to the end of the car. This reduces turbulence and low pressure behind the car, hence reducing drag.
Yes. Fastbacks do not always even have hatches. Most early fastbacks had fixed rear glass and trunks. It's the lines of the body that determine a fastback, not the type of cargo cover. The 240 is a hatchback AND a fastback.

For instance:This 1968 Ford Galaxie 500 XL is a fastback. It has a trunk, so it's not a hatchback.

This Corolla is a hatchback, but not a fastback.

And the corvette fastback, just like the 180sx, is both a fastback bodystyle and a hatchback cargo cover.

Fastback is a BODY style, like Coupe, and not a name for the cargo lid, like hatch.

Sil40_Mayhem
Posts: 3165
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 9:35 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX 5spd
1992 Acura Integra LS

Post

themadscientist wrote:I didn't know anyone still spoke martian
Eh, like I said, someone moved my pills so there's no telling what happened. Oh yeah, 240s suck!!! Hyundai Accent for teh win!!!!1!!1one!one

Dammit, time for another pill...

Kenrik
Posts: 5736
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:01 am
Car: Nissan 240SX Coupe
Infiniti G35 Coupe
Nissan Versa Hatch

Post

Hey I like the popups on my coup.. but only with the pignose bumper..

User avatar
9240sx
Posts: 2676
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 4:06 am
Car: What i believe to be the cleanest s13 in the world.

SR20DET + RS*R-Apexi-Nismo-Trust-HKS= 100% pure love
Location: New Mexico

Post

The truth is other car guys well love the coupes,But the Ladies well love the fastback.And thats were it matters the most.LOL Coupes are not very sporty looking.The Fastback is.

tonynalli
Posts: 1402
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 5:59 am
Contact:

Post

i used to only like the fastbacks until i bought a coupe, now i dont think that i ever drive anything else. they look soo...oldish, i dont kno. kinda like a half an arrow or something. coupes=teh sexy. and ive found that more girls liek the coupes better. but to each his own

User avatar
masticatingcow
Posts: 2338
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 8:39 am
Car: 94 Mazda FD3S

Post

tonynalli wrote:... and ive found that more girls liek the coupes better. but to each his own
I've found that the kind of girl that will judge you based on the car you drive isn't worth knowing. Now, the kind of girl who can differentiate between the fastback and the coupe, heh, that's another story.

User avatar
Eikon
Posts: 6928
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:20 am
Car: 71 240z, 93 Supra TT
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Contact:

Post

Florida240sx wrote:Fastbackl/hatchback....who really cares.Was marketed that way but I refer mine as a hatch all the time. I either say hatch or fastback.Is it really worth arguing over? fastback>coupefastback=coupe with silvia frontVert>well vert is in it's own league of hotnessALL S13's>S14's
Hell yeah!!! Verts rule!!!

User avatar
xekushnr
Posts: 5084
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 7:51 am
Car: '90 Nissan 240SX Hatch
Contact:

Post

so...why wasnt this thread closed as soon as it was posted?

vvaffle
Posts: 497
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:29 pm
Car: 1991 240sx base hatch, 2009 WRX

Post

xekushnr wrote:so...why wasnt this thread closed as soon as it was posted?
probably because the moderators didnt catch it in time. At least people aren't flaming each other and there is actually a good discusion going on. While on the topic, how come noone has ever made a poll about this?

dfw240_EE
Posts: 1137
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 2:04 am
Car: 1992 240SX
Contact:

Post

Better yet, does anyone know the production ratio between coupes and fastbacks? The driftkat site is the best I know of for production numbers but it doesn't break them down by body style.

I consider myself a car guy and I own a fastback. Truth be told it was the first 240SX I found in good condition at a decent price, plus it had some features I liked. Crank windows for example. Actually the one that sold me was that it lacked a spoiler. Of course with those options you guys probably can already guess it doesn't have a VLSD, but that can be remedied easy enough.

User avatar
Dattebayo
Posts: 33288
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 10:04 am
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier Desert Runner
Location: NE DC

Post

Fastbacks were available in far greater numbers in the early years, the later years the coupe owned.

As far as resale value goes, the coupe and the hatch have the same value. The only deciding factor is whether you have a sunroof or not. The non-sunroof 240SX's have the best value because they most likely do not have any leaks to outside weather.

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

bryanmenard wrote:Because that's how they were marketed. Truth be told, I call it both. If someone asks me what kind of 240 I have, I say "fastback." But, in casual conversation, I refer to it as a hatchback.

Also, I think a hatchback better describes a VW Golf or GTI....THAT is a hatch. The 240SX is so sleek....just makes it seem more of a "fast" than a "hatch"
Good explanation on fastback vs hatchback. I tend to use them intrechangably, but there is a difference.

User avatar
Ace 2.0
Posts: 516
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 9:30 am
Car: z32 2+2,1987 CRX si
Location: americas pubic hair.

Post

+1 for teh Coupe.personally I like the kinda boxy-ish type cars.euro styled cars like BMW but japanese cars like 90s nissans are squared off and I love older Maximas and Skylines,the new ones are just meh.IMO a 240 is a 240 nomatter if its a coupe or a fastback.But I like teh coupes body style.

User avatar
turbo_lover
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:16 am
Car: 240sx

Post

I am not a "I like the fast back better" or vica versa kinda guy. I LOVE them both. The coupes look good with s13 head ligfhts. So does a FB. A FB looks great with kouki tails I am not sure if there is an alternative for the coupes tails . . . They both look great IMO. if i were to choose, well.... i would get a FB. not to be a bandwagon jumper, but for the looks of it. I have liked them since 2002. { When they werent so popular } but i would like to have a coupe too. I would get BOTH !!!! grr . . .

dfw240_EE
Posts: 1137
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 2:04 am
Car: 1992 240SX
Contact:

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:Yes. Fastbacks do not always even have hatches. Most early fastbacks had fixed rear glass and trunks. It's the lines of the body that determine a fastback, not the type of cargo cover. The 240 is a hatchback AND a fastback.

For instance:This 1968 Ford Galaxie 500 XL is a fastback. It has a trunk, so it's not a hatchback.

This Corolla is a hatchback, but not a fastback.

And the corvette fastback, just like the 180sx, is both a fastback bodystyle and a hatchback cargo cover.

Fastback is a BODY style, like Coupe, and not a name for the cargo lid, like hatch.
You learn something new everyday, I didn't mention it last night, but I never knew that there was a trunk equipped fast back. Shows how much I know about old cars. I guess when I think of it the later model Supras were fastback-ish cars with trunks. In fact alot of cars these days have roof lines that slope into the trunk (often at the expense of rear headroom!).

User avatar
PantherRacer
Posts: 9408
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:32 pm
Car: 1992 Nissan Skyline R32 RB20DET Sedan
Location: The Moorish Throne of Atlantis
Contact:

Post


dfw240_EE
Posts: 1137
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2003 2:04 am
Car: 1992 240SX
Contact:

Post

Well, see that is a hatch, not a fastback with a true trunk. I meant more like the Ford posted above.

User avatar
ArticDragon192
Posts: 2767
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:35 pm
Car: 91 Z32 2+2

Post

sleepy180 wrote:'nuff said.
Everyone loves my pic


Return to “240sx General Discussion”