best tires I've ever owned. You won't regret it.Em35X wrote:I'll need new tires around Fall and these were on the top of my list. Are they relatively quiet?
Ditto, and quiet. You know, the only reason I try to keep this thread around is because the proper tires really make all the difference w/the M. You can spend 60K buying one of these machines, mod it 'til you go into the poor house, but what makes contact w/the road is only the rubber. The whole shebang rides on the rubber. That's really what will make or break your driving experience and the safety of you and your loved ones. It's the rubber.mycross3 wrote:best tires I've ever owned. You won't regret it.Em35X wrote:I'll need new tires around Fall and these were on the top of my list. Are they relatively quiet?
paulypotz wrote:Just got my full set of DWS delivered today..will put them on this weekend!!

Where can I find DWS's for only $125 each?antzrus wrote:[ Continental Extreme Contact DWS
$125 80
Not the size for the M. I believe that was a quote for a smaller size tire on Consumer Reports. Altho, I did pay $133 ea (TireRack) for my first set of ContiExtremeContacts for my M back in Dec., 2007.EniGmA1987 wrote:Where can I find DWS's for only $125 each?antzrus wrote:[ Continental Extreme Contact DWS
$125 80
Wow, ExtremeContacts generally are known to wear out sooner than expected-but so much at 20k miles? I've got 15k on them and I don't notice any significant wear yet. Of course, I drive like a lively 64 year old..!Modeler wrote:The DWS on my Lexus GS 450h that I'm selling have worn out much faster than what the tread wear index or warranty would suggest. I'd say they are about 70% worn after less than 20K miles. Since I'm selling the car, I'm not going to pursue warranty replacement /refund.
I've never added air either, Tire Barn always uses nitrogen (no charge) and I'd never used nitrogen, so I thought that might actually have something to do with it. However, I got a hole in one and paid Big O Tire to fix it because I didn't want to drive to Tire Barn, so it doesn't have nitrogen (only 70%, anyway), and I haven't had to add air to it either. Bought the tires in January @ 89,598 MI, got the hole in May @ 99,549 MI, so I'll have to find the paperwork on that, but it was some time ago, and currently have > 111K with the S still showing (so over 21K on the tires). I got my Michelin Pilot Sport A/S Pluses at 49,957, though, so it's no wonder that they were useless in the snow almost 40K later (they were great in the snow the first year, definitely better than the DWS on the only post-January snow experience I had, but so much louder too).antzrus wrote:Wow, ExtremeContacts generally are known to wear out sooner than expected-but so much at 20k miles? I've got 15k on them and I don't notice any significant wear yet. Of course, I drive like a lively 64 year old..!Modeler wrote:The DWS on my Lexus GS 450h that I'm selling have worn out much faster than what the tread wear index or warranty would suggest. I'd say they are about 70% worn after less than 20K miles. Since I'm selling the car, I'm not going to pursue warranty replacement /refund.
Anyone experience the no air leaking phenomenon?

If only they were nto so hard to get. For my M37S backordered with no ETA so went with General GMAX (owned by Conti as well). So far digging the tires, very responsive and nice ride, but a tad noisier than I expected at speeds over 45MPH, but not as bad as the Potenzas RE050s. Rolling resistance seems much lower as well early to tell but seems like my MPG is up about 1 as well.axefire wrote:Continental Extreme Contact DWS tires are the cats meow! Just put them on, they are the best tires...
I used to get this with my riken raptors... very noisy tires compared to the DWS, and again tire pressure constantly fluctuating ...antzrus wrote:So I'm not the only person w/this effect; there are two..? How can a tire lose air (it's got to) so damn slowly?
Hmmm ... I have to admit that this surprises me.antzrus wrote:So I'm not the only person w/this effect; there are two..? How can a tire lose air (it's got to) so damn slowly?
Really, I actually went from April until a few days ago w/the "cold (first thing in the am)" @ 35 psi w/out any addition of air. I use a pretty fancy electronic "racing" gage that is very accurate as well.szh wrote:Hmmm ... I have to admit that this surprises me.antzrus wrote:So I'm not the only person w/this effect; there are two..? How can a tire lose air (it's got to) so damn slowly?
Z
I use an "Accutire Racing Gauge" ... is that the one you have?antzrus wrote:Really, I actually went from April until a few days ago w/the "cold (first thing in the am)" @ 35 psi w/out any addition of air. I use a pretty fancy electronic "racing" gage that is very accurate as well.
Agreed!chelubi wrote:Having got rid of the Goodyear RSA's two weeks ago, I strongly recommend everyone person do so. They are the worst tire that I have ever had on the 25 cars I have owned over the last 35 years.
I am not anti-Goodyear as I put on Goodyear Eagle F1 Assymetricals. Different tread pattern, different ride. They drive in a straight line, no tramlining, and tons of traction.
Makes you wonder why how every service manager who drives the M35X with RSA's is remarkably unaware of the RSA tire problem. What about Infiniti Executives?? Maybe they drive the M45 which does not have this problem. (I had an M45S and it never tramlined.)
I have had my car jerk off the road onto the shoulder because I hit a crack in the road. My wife would not drive my car because of its instability. This is definitely a safety issue.
It's not the car.... It's the RSA tire.