I knew you were lifting pictures of someone else's coco mats!antzrus wrote:
OMG! Where'd you get my 2001 AARP Powder Puff Derby picture?![]()
I knew you were lifting pictures of someone else's coco mats!antzrus wrote:
OMG! Where'd you get my 2001 AARP Powder Puff Derby picture?![]()
The00Dustin wrote:I knew you were lifting pictures of someone else's coco mats!antzrus wrote:
OMG! Where'd you get my 2001 AARP Powder Puff Derby picture?![]()
red handed...The DWS is a newer version of the old ContiExtremeContact. I got poor tread wear on those older Conti's and have complained so herein, as have many. I just changed over to the DWS about a month ago, so I have no comments yet.kluken wrote:What I find odd is many complain of the tread life, yet they have a 50K warranty, if they are wearing out that quickly is anyone making warranty claims? the stock RE050 has a treadwear of 140 and people claim 10-20K miles on those, and the DWS has a treadwear of 540 and I know there is some BS to those numbers, but I would think you can get 20-30K out of a tire with a treadwear of 540?? Or are people just not maintaining the tires? I keep my tires 3-5psi over inflated and rotate balance every 6K miles.
So Antzrus, you still diggin' the DWS? I'm now about 11K on mine and after the last rotate/align found my old friend tramlining has returned. Not like on the Goodyear OEM, but certinaly more pronounced than when the Contis were new. I generally agree with the poster commenting on the softer sidewalls, but I personally prefer the softer ride to the harsher feel of firmer sidewalls on the M. That is probably my bias coming from an Avalon, which is about as soft and floaty as it gets, so partly my conditioning. Tread wear on the DWS seems about average, so no complaints. I still love my M and I'm not ooking for a change, even with more tramlining.antzrus wrote:The DWS is a newer version of the old ContiExtremeContact. I got poor tread wear on those older Conti's and have complained so herein, as have many. I just changed over to the DWS about a month ago, so I have no comments yet.kluken wrote:What I find odd is many complain of the tread life, yet they have a 50K warranty, if they are wearing out that quickly is anyone making warranty claims? the stock RE050 has a treadwear of 140 and people claim 10-20K miles on those, and the DWS has a treadwear of 540 and I know there is some BS to those numbers, but I would think you can get 20-30K out of a tire with a treadwear of 540?? Or are people just not maintaining the tires? I keep my tires 3-5psi over inflated and rotate balance every 6K miles.
The DWS is still fairly new on the market and so I would not expect much feedback yet on tread wear. Szh is so far the only person I've seen herein w/such complaints about the new DWS. But then he's one of those insane enthusiasts who like a cat leaves their scent everywhere. He likes to to leave his rubber everywhere, even at the old folks Pleasent View Asisted Living Home crosswalk !!
I just switched from the old ExtremeContact to the DWS less than 1k miles ago. So far I have no complaints. The DWS is even quieter than the old Conti's and tramlining is gone-as it was at about 99.5% w/the old Conti's. It is still early in its release and the miles will start to mount in the next year or so and we'll see if this happens for this tire. Sorry to hear about it returning for you.geomap55 wrote: So Antzrus, you still diggin' the DWS? I'm now about 11K on mine and after the last rotate/align found my old friend tramlining has returned. Not like on the Goodyear OEM, but certinaly more pronounced than when the Contis were new. I generally agree with the poster commenting on the softer sidewalls, but I personally prefer the softer ride to the harsher feel of firmer sidewalls on the M. That is probably my bias coming from an Avalon, which is about as soft and floaty as it gets, so partly my conditioning. Tread wear on the DWS seems about average, so no complaints. I still love my M and I'm not ooking for a change, even with more tramlining.
Yeah, the Avalon is the best value in that class, just like the M is the best value in its class. But VERY different cars.RNF wrote:The Avalon is the ultimate Geezer-Pleaser as it ticks all the right boxes; Inexpensive, like riding on a cloud, quiet, decent mpg....did I mention inexpensive?
I'm considering one for business use
The Conti's are excellent in the snow, as well as all the other road conditions I've had them on. This tire is a precursor of the final step; a truly all season making summer/snow tires obsolete.nemo1 wrote:Pretty funny Antman. How are those contis? finally had a few inches of snow in St Louis to give mine a test. As expected, they performed great! Have about 6k miles on them with little if any visible wear. That said, maintaining proper air pressure seems key. Just had them rotated an noticed significant tramlining yet again. then realized the dealership had pumped up my rt front tire to 38 cold. Not sure why?
My original RSA's were already showing significant wear at 6k miles.
"So far so good?" Where do you live? Do you get any heavy dutyaudtatious wrote:If you are getting tramlining then it may be time to check the toe
I just put DWS's on the sedan to replace some Hankook Ventus S4's which were supposed to be real "all season" but absolutely sucked in the snow. So far so good.

All right! Now get the CoCo mats and you'll be all set!!!audtatious wrote:I played around in a parking lot with 3"+ of snow and it did well. Not perfect, but what I expected them to do with a 300hp+ RWD vehicle. For an all-season they work quite well.

antzrus wrote: All right! Now get the CoCo mats and you'll be all set!!!
man what the hell are those lol.... get some new matts.. this isnt the 60s!!antzrus wrote:All right! Now get the CoCo mats and you'll be all set!!!audtatious wrote:I played around in a parking lot with 3"+ of snow and it did well. Not perfect, but what I expected them to do with a 300hp+ RWD vehicle. For an all-season they work quite well.
You had a new Datsun?? Your Nissan history goes far back!antzrus wrote:My new '68 Datsun 2000 had'em. My present Datsun M has'em too!! They are good for Winter too.
DudeZ wrote:You had a new Datsun?? Your Nissan history goes far back!antzrus wrote:My new '68 Datsun 2000 had'em. My present Datsun M has'em too!! They are good for Winter too.