aces805 wrote:This cash for clunkers program is really just a fed bailout to drive foot traffic into the dealerships. A marketing budget. Fuel economy is not the real issue. In order to qualify, you must improve MPG by 2. What a joke. Also, to qualify you must buy ONLY a new car. What if someone wants to buy a 2008 Altima Hybrid? That would certainly improve MPG.
Also, the $3500 - $4500 cannot be used as a down-payment in the "front" of the car deal. The feds are not cutting checks to the public. It is a reimbursement that is applied at the end of the car deal so that the $$$ goes directly to the dealerships. The dealership simply marks down the sticker price of the new car, again at the END of the car deal.
The cash for clunkers incentive does not factor into the financing at all. Customers must still be approved for the original sticker price of the new car without the cash for clunkers incentive. So, if the new car costs $22500, the customer's credit app must be approved for $22500, not $18000 ($22500 minus $4500).
New cars depreciate 25% - 35% in the first year of ownership.
Oh well, enjoy what you got while you got it. I'm gonna go for a drive up the PCH to Santa Barbara tomorrow. Should be a nice ride.
I can understand the fuel but are you burning oil or is an extra quart or two going to break your bank account every oil change?tmak26b wrote:I had a good year with it while it lasted, but I knew the car was inefficient and the new car would use half the oil and gas.
I am using less oil am I? Isn't that part of the goal of this legislation? To decrease the use of oil/gas and also stimulate the economy.Paul Wall wrote:
I can understand the fuel but are you burning oil or is an extra quart or two going to break your bank account every oil change?
tmak26b wrote:I am using less oil am I? Isn't that part of the goal of this legislation? To decrease the use of oil/gas
Yes, if "econonmy" = campaign coffers of candidates with a "D" behind their name getting contributions by the auto industry.tmak26b wrote:and also stimulate the economy.
I am sorry, but I owned a C6, 350z, RX-8 and many other sports car. The Q to me is a commuter boat, not what I consider fun. I will miss the Q, but not for the same reason as you mentioned. I know the record of the new car because it had 2 miles on it when I picked it up..........Paul Wall wrote:OK but where are you going to find another fun and fair to maintain car like you had?
I think we all won't live long enough to see the effects of "Global Warming" so WHO GIVES A f***, LIVE LIFE TO THE FULLEST WITH NO REGRETS!!!
Modified by Paul Wall at 1:00 AM 7/30/2009
Please take your political crap out of it. I am a full grown adult and I can think for myself. If you like your republicans so much, go vote more of them in. Maybe they will take you in as their little bf/gf on the side.Q451990 wrote:
No
Yes, if "econonmy" = campaign coffers of candidates with a "D" behind their name getting contributions by the auto industry.
Yeah, my jaw almost dropped because I was rushing my friend to complete his deal on his Versa. He was supposed to pick up the Versa at 2PM today, but he couldn't do it because he was trying to strip every mod he put into the car so he can make a few quick bucks. Now he is left without the versa and with a super beat clunker!Victor wrote:This article says the government is going to suspend the cash for clunkers program.http://www.breitbart.com/artic...cle=1
sidewaysonmy180 wrote:have any of you people ever thought of this a 1988 through 1991 honda crx hf model gets about 45 mpg and you can go pick one up in la for about $1500. while a prios does the same mpg but costs $20000 and we know everything now a days are made to break. so why would any one get them selves into dept like that. we all know old cars are better except for my 240sx its worse than having a girl friend.hahahaha