Fenvy wrote:I paid about 1000$ for my exhaust manifold and I am probably willing to pay the same for a well built intake manifold backed by realistic dyno gain.
I think one of the issue here is that people believe they're paying 1200$ for carbon fiber. Sorry for my ignorance but I fail to see how CF would help performance.
If my understanding is correct, the carbon fibre resists heat soak into the intake stream more than metal. And you get a smoother finish inside the plenum as well as the added benefit of being very light and very sturdy.
A properly made CF mani isn't for looks. BMW used it on the old Evo M3s back in the day.
Here's a link I found from a google search on the benefits:
http://www.advancedinductionresearch.com/faq.htm
Here's some performance charts from AIR showing off the power gains and performance benefits of the CF manifold for its Honda application. You can also take a moment to laugh at the Honda's inability to make torque >.>http://www.advancedinductionre...a.htm
I'm not trying to pimp out Sean's idea. I'm just simply showing the other side of the argument of "that costs too much". I think what would really help is if we could get side by side dyno comparisons of the CF mani and a real Greddy mani. Of course, that's not quite as likely to happen if Sean doesn't get some interest in the piece to warrant the R&D needed to make it.
On a side note, I noticed AIR's Honda intake mani looks strikingly similar to Fiber Dynamics'.
Sean, I added a middle of the road option for the poll. Seemed a bit unfair to have just the yes or no.