1.) If it looked clean and didn't have any film, it probably was clean. Failure to use OEM filters changed annually is the primary cause of failure. I won't even talk about CAI "mods."carcrazyguy wrote:1.) So far I have cleaned the MAF as I saw in one post. This did not seem to make any difference at all. After cleaning it it looked the same too - there was no visual difference, but then again, it looked nearly new somehow.
2.) The car doesn't really have a service history so to speak...has 190K (all highway) and probably nothing done other than regular stuff (fluid, belts, filters, etc) since it was purchased at 100K where it was bought from an Infiniti dealer - and they claimed to have done everything to make it current at that point.
3.) BTW, the fuel pump sounds quite audible, but he says it has always been that way. However, in my opinion, it is much louder than what you would think a $50K car would be. Is that normal for these cars? I have yet to own anything where it is this noticeable, even my Z cars.
4.) On a totally different note, upon browsing lots o' posts here, I keep seeing people quoting their Q45 as 4300 lbs. I remember reading many articles on these over the years and it was nothing like that. I looked one up and the published weight for one w. everything was 4015, and test weight (actual scale weight w. test equipment on board) was 4160. I have seen them listed in the high 3K's before too. Either way, that is ALOT, but I am used to forum people underquoting weight, if anything. BTW, I own a 3200lb Z32 which gets lots of flack about being too heavy too.
5.) Anyway, dad has been relying on local repair (hack joints) to keep his car serviced for years, and now I am in the picture - I will try to steer this in the right direction and use this forum to learn everything I can and keep his car out of those places that basically only have experience working on diposable stuff (Neons, Grand Ams. etc). Hope you guys can help save a Q from this fate!
I forgot - I also changed that too for him. That didn't make a difference either however.Skibane wrote:When was the last time the fuel filter was changed?
If by some chance this is the OEM fuel pump, or even the second, I would say he's incredibly lucky. These typically make it to about 80K!carcrazyguy wrote:So far at nearly 200K nothing has ever went wrong with the car, so I guess it might be time. His last car, an 89 Maxima SE (that he bought new) never had a single problem either, and had 280K when he sold it...so I guess he is lucky with cars (until now).
Are you speaking of the little 3 prong connector? In other words, precisely what did you replace? Was it visually bad?CrimsonQ wrote:My car had the same issues. Fixed by replacing the MAF wiring/connector.
As far as the Infiniti parts managers and technicians are concerned, it is a $50K car. There are is no further discount over the used price you paid for all the deferred maintenance. This is true of all cars.carcrazyguy wrote:I've learned that Q45's are still $40K-$50K cars, even when they cost $2500, for example.
I guess I will need to figure out if his car needs that or the pump itself.Unless there is a quick technique that someone wants to offer, I will research on this forum.Jesda wrote:When I had this problem, the FPCU was dying.
1.) Read Tangalora's excellent post in this forum.carcrazyguy wrote:1.) I guess I will need to figure out if his car needs that or the pump itself. Unless there is a quick technique that someone wants to offer, I will research on this forum.
2.) Just out of curiousity, why is the Q so prone to have problems in these areas and the MAF too? Yesterday dad and I were discussing it and he also is in denial and I could not give an explanation.
Yes, he is more less like that. He has gotten away with it however for a long time...longer than many of us have been alive.Anyway, I am still stumped on the frequent failure of the pump and control unit in Q's. As mentioned I am a Z guy, and I would bet they have the same pump and nearly identical control unit. Also, they do seem to have nearly the same MAF (but the Z even has 2 of them). So why would a Q have all of these issues when I have never heard of a Z32 needing either - and people typically drive the crap out of them?maxnix wrote:MAF failures usually are connector failures, usually caused by changing the oil filter form the top. MAF failures are caused by poor air filter maintenance or after market units. You Dad is a drive'em into the ground type owner. All vehicles benefit form maintenance.
Exposure to heat. It really needs a shield like MBs have around their batteries.carcrazyguy wrote:Just out of curiousity, why is the Q so prone to have problems in these areas and the MAF too?
You will probably be stumped until you read more here, update us on your maintenance history, and probably get a power balance test performed by a senior tech.peety wrote: no enough time to put on diag. this has stumped me for a little while now.
CALL JOE FOR ALL YOUR PARTS NEEDS, 1 888 216 5328 http://www.infinitipartsusa.comcarcrazyguy wrote:Update:
I did the jumper technique on the FPCU (will make some pics in a little while). The car ran fine! So I guess the car has a bad FPCU.
So now I am thinking maybe I will talk Dad into - getting a good used FPCU, a new fuel pump, filter (strainer?), and gasket. Just for good measure, I will also have him get a new MAF connector...seems like it is only $12 or something.
Seems like I remember someone that sells good used FPCU's on another similar thread I read the other day but cannot re-find...is that any of you guys? Also I noticed several people mentioning buying their OEM parts from a certain person that is on this forum, but I never could find a phone number or contact info. Does anyone know that off hand?
Well, not necessarily, unless you measured the fuel pressure, which should be >43 psi. Don't forget the new O ring.carcrazyguy wrote:I did the jumper technique on the FPCU (will make some pics in a little while). The car ran fine! So I guess the car has a bad FPCU.
I took the FPCU apart already and it looked perfect at every joint, nothing burnt, no smell, etc - I could not have imagined it in better visual condition. Aftert doing some thinking, I relized that by bypassing the FPCU in my test, I was also bypassing the TPS and the MAF more less too, right?So yesterday I tested the TPS and it was within spec. I removed the MAF cap and it smelt a funky inside that area, so the problem now could be the MAF...but the connectors and the actual air flow area look perfect.Unless someone has any more ideas, all I know to do at this point is buy a good MAF and FPCU and see which is the issue, but I guess I will try to start with the MAF to potentially aviod buying an unnecessary FPCU.Too bad there isn't someone locally that had a good running Q to "borrow" a MAF / FPCU from just long enough to see what the deal is.squeefoo wrote:Take the FPCU apart before you get another one.Look at the point where the pins connect to the board, and look if the solder is melted between the board and the pin(s).Then look at the 2 (or 4 ?) silver flat looking things on the sides and see if those are burned. If the solder is melted try that first, then you might be able to save it and $$$$.When the flat silver-colored things are burned it's junk.
No, you only by passed the FPCU control from the ECU.carcrazyguy wrote: Aftert doing some thinking, I relized that by bypassing the FPCU in my test, I was also bypassing the TPS and the MAF more less too, right?