EMK wrote:I have read several build threads and I have yet to see anyone swap USDM VH45DE into an S chasis and keep everything working. Why is this it seems as though it's possible if albeit a lot of work.
Anything's possible with enough time/effort/money.
EMK wrote:AC why has nobody got this functioning?
Because nobody cares enough... put the window down and accelerate, rather than run power robbing AC!
EMK wrote:Alternator why must we notch the frame rail? KA alternator or maybe even the Quest alternator?
I agree that notching the chassis rail is a bad idea... but it is also the simplest fix for those who just want their VH thrash car running.
EMK wrote:Power Steering Custom Lines maybe?
I have P/S running in my conversion... using the VH41DE P/S pump, R32 steering rack, and custom lines. It works well Mine's not an S chassis, but all the engine bay and strut tower measurements are identical to the S chassis (although in RHD format.)
EMK wrote:Would it be less trouble to just track down a JDM VH41DE and mate it to the VQ3xHR 6 speed?
To my knowledge it won't just directly bolt up, it'll be an adaptor plate/modified bellhousing job like any other VH conversion. Unless you have some proof otherwise, I'm fairly confident that this is not the case. We went through this in another thread some months back, and sought out pictures of the late model 350Z 6 speed box, which showed a different bellhousing bolt pattern.
EMK wrote:Would this not yeild a much more favorable accessory location and drivebelt routing?
This it would! Alternator at the top, oil filter closer to the block, and narrower front covers due to smaller cam gears, have proved to be extremely convenient!
EMK wrote:Please correct me if I've just been reading too long and have information running together, but this seems like the path of least resistance. The JDM VH41DE does retain all the potenecy of the USDM VH45DE if I'm not mistaken.
Let the war begin.
You are and aren't mistaken. The JDM VH41DE is to me the most logical choice... not only because of the accessory placement and improved timing chain setup, but because in my part of the world they're a heck of a lot more common and affordable than the VH45DE. However should you want to use one, you'd still want to slap the VH45DE crank and pistons in to get the maximum benefit of the added displacement & piston acceleration.
As you can see, many of the guys here have just encountered problems and gone on to solve them in whatever way is necessary. Things like accessory placement are more of a minor inconvenience than a major hitch... and if it's going to save you money in the long run to get your hands on a VH45DE, then there's nothing wrong with going down that route. The 94-95 version of the engine would be the most desirable.