Hate to burst your bubble, but multipurpose doesn't really work too well. Autox, drag, drift-- all have very different setups. Drag = super soft suspension with small front brakes and rotors. Autox = very stiff chassis/susp with large brakes and rotors. The best you could shoot for is middle ground but the car won't be competitive in either type of event.BACARDI_DWB wrote:well this car is going to be multi purpose and i am building it to Withstand 600-700 hp. it will most likely be a 400hp daily driver. but i am building the block to withstand 700hp and i want to have the drivetrain to withstand it also.
Your track record of questions shows otherwise--BACARDI_DWB wrote:ok wow! this is why i really don't like coming on this site that often.
c-rad i know you have the best intentions. but i said neither of the sort. i said "it will most likely be a 400hp daily driver" nothing else. please don't tell me how to tune my car.
Bearings change compression?BACARDI_DWB wrote:Looking into bearings i noticed there are different sizes other than the standard. of course this can increase compression and/or lower it i was wonderin besides wear and tear and heat transfer what would be the main reason for going with the different sizes and what would you guys suggest as shown in this site:
So is it a daily driver or a race car? And I see a pattern with you putting yourself out there for criticism, yet get all TO'd when someone does criticize you.BACARDI_DWB wrote:Alright first is first
I am not looking for alternatives to what other rods their are i am pretty set on the titanium rods.
Secondly this is not going to be a daily driver this is my race car
and also i am fully aware of what stock can do
its my money let me spend it how i want i was wonderin if there is anyone with any experiance with titanium rods.
Contradict yourself much?BACARDI_DWB wrote:and the type of racing i am building for is drag and scca racing. i want to build a car that can do both. not professionally but just cause its something that i have wanted to do. and as to your last statement
That it? You're welcome.BACARDI_DWB wrote:alright c-rad. your right ok my plans have changed. and.. wow big man you called me out on all my old posts. seems you have nothing better to do with your life than pwn someone for asking questions? just because i say its my race car does not mean its not going to be driven on the street. i will give you what you want. YOU ARE THE MAN! I want EVERYONE TO KNOW THAT C-RAD pwned me without helping someone who didn't know and had questions!!! thanks for all the help C-RAD i am glad you were there with the assist.
hate to burst your bubble but in drag you want a hard rear so it puts the power to the ground, and in the front you want it to rebound fast and compress slow. (easy out, hard in.)c-rad wrote:
Hate to burst your bubble, but multipurpose doesn't really work too well. Autox, drag, drift-- all have very different setups. Drag = super soft suspension with small front brakes and rotors. Autox = very stiff chassis/susp with large brakes and rotors. The best you could shoot for is middle ground but the car won't be competitive in either type of event.
pls explain. there are plenty of high horsepower r32-33-34, s13-14-15, datsun z's etc. running the r180-200 etc rear ends.c-rad wrote:better have a ford 9" rear with a solid axle too
wtf is pwned? can we keep it english in here? i dont speak ethug or whatever that **** is.BACARDI_DWB wrote:alright c-rad. your right ok my plans have changed. and.. wow big man you called me out on all my old posts. seems you have nothing better to do with your life than pwn someone for asking questions? just because i say its my race car does not mean its not going to be driven on the street. i will give you what you want. YOU ARE THE MAN! I want EVERYONE TO KNOW THAT C-RAD pwned me without helping someone who didn't know and had questions!!! thanks for all the help C-RAD i am glad you were there with the assist.
can i say dont waste your time?BACARDI_DWB wrote:yeah i am going to use a r200. can i say ford cosworth? or the rear end out of a subaru STI... either way i will get that power to the ground.. it may be up in smoke but i will have independant rear regardless
That is one of the best set of advice i have heard of in a while, i have been looking at the inboard brake setup that the corvetts used to use. but i like that R200 idea .ca18datsun510 wrote:
can i say dont waste your time?
if you are really gonna be making that much power, get a r200, put in a real lsd, and while you're at it, change over to cv joints in the rear axles and ditch the stock u-joint style axles.
or leave them and hope they break(like a fuse) before your stock ca trans.
400+ horse, dont waste your time with a viscous lsd. spend the money there just like the rest of the money you are spending on the motor and trans.
then setup the rear suspension real good. box the rear control arms, and notch them for tire clearence, cause that 510 aint gonna hook up with anything that will fit under a stock setup rear end unless you got flares.
change over to a coilover setup, and ditch the stock rear spring/shock setup.
stitch weld that ***** and add a rollcage.
30+ year old datsun made out of recycled buicks and tin cans dont like 400 horse and traction.