I have the 300z trans hat has been adapted to my car and have done some other upgrades to the subframe. I talked with one of teh crew from enjuku for their drag car and he let me in on some of the issues I would face.Fireplug wrote:I have the exact same setup in my head as you do...everything is the same. This may not be of much help, but it's what I understand.
#1. From what I've heard, the lash killer kit is trash...The people that have told me this haven't gone into detail about why it is...but they are very reputable SR guys so I trust them. Also, I have heard the same thing about the lash killer kit not working with the Step 2's.
#2. Why are you launching so high on the 2 step? You're building boost with that 2 step...and launching the piss outta that thing...How much boost are you running out of the hole? I'm suprised you haven't gone through rear end/axles. I would venture to say a more mild launch (5500-6500 range) would be more beneficial on your drivetrain/valvetrain. Is your car bogging if you don't rev it to the 6900-7K+ range? I'm really not sure of what a good "fix" would be for eliminating your problem except for switching to solid lifters....and i've heard that they're tough to get right...
I'm sorry if I came off as criticising you, I didn't mean it that way. If it hooks that hard at launch do you think it's too much of a slick for the car/car's power? Maybe you could go to a MT 8.5-10" slick so it won't hook as hard and get better results with your times, a few guys I talk to have some MT 8.5" slicks and he's running 11.1's-11.0's on them. That might be a route to go, that way with a little spin you'll be easier on your valvetrain and it won't bog = faster times. It seems to me that launching that high is going to keep doing that to the rocker arms but I'm not sure. Try the new ones you got and let us know. I'm interested to see how this turns out.SILVIADRIFTR wrote:I have the 300z trans hat has been adapted to my car and have done some other upgrades to the subframe. I talked with one of teh crew from enjuku for their drag car and he let me in on some of the issues I would face.
yes, the car will bog if it doesn't stay in the power band of the turbo since the car hooks at launch.
I'm well aware that the 2 step "allows" him to do so, but I was questioning if a 69-7700 launch was beneficial...that's why I asked if he was bogging at any lower launches. I wasn't trying to rip him apart, simply asking a question to figure out why he had to launch so high. and a 7200 launch is not always > then a 5500 launch...It actually depends on the persons setup. Don't tell me a 7200 launch (assuming the drivetrain is setup for it) is going to be better on a stock SR with bolt-ons.Nismo_Freak wrote:C'mon people read his post.
2. He launches that high because he has an aftermarket management that allows him to, obviously he is on some level of tire.
3. Launching at 7200 RPM > 5500 RPM
the only thing that i have seen for rocker arms are the stoppers..you are using them are you not... also contact AEBS they modded there rocker arms some how ... maybe they well let you in on what they did...been to lazy and the car is to far apart then together to call them my selfNismo_Freak wrote:
You can try upgrading the rockers to the superior stock design.
No offense taken. It does run better with the et streets since it spins instead of hooks but I have to run it up to around 6500 to get them to spin. Maybe we'll play with the tire pressures a little as well. I did run the 1.57 spinning the et streets so that may be better for me than hooking. It ran 11.22 at the end of last year with right at 400whp with the et streets and 1.65 60ft so I will probably try the smaller slick and maybe go with a smaller width on the slick. But I still can't figure out why the rockers would come out unless it is geting valve float at high rpms on the 2 step from it being so harsh.Fireplug wrote:
I'm sorry if I came off as criticising you, I didn't mean it that way. If it hooks that hard at launch do you think it's too much of a slick for the car/car's power? Maybe you could go to a MT 8.5-10" slick so it won't hook as hard and get better results with your times, a few guys I talk to have some MT 8.5" slicks and he's running 11.1's-11.0's on them. That might be a route to go, that way with a little spin you'll be easier on your valvetrain and it won't bog = faster times. It seems to me that launching that high is going to keep doing that to the rocker arms but I'm not sure. Try the new ones you got and let us know. I'm interested to see how this turns out.
I'm well aware that the 2 step "allows" him to do so, but I was questioning if a 69-7700 launch was beneficial...that's why I asked if he was bogging at any lower launches. I wasn't trying to rip him apart, simply asking a question to figure out why he had to launch so high. and a 7200 launch is not always > then a 5500 launch...It actually depends on the persons setup. Don't tell me a 7200 launch (assuming the drivetrain is setup for it) is going to be better on a stock SR with bolt-ons.
Modified by Fireplug at 9:52 AM 5/18/2005
It says http://www.aebsracing.com account is suspended. Anybody have their phone number by chance????????????USsil80 wrote:
the only thing that i have seen for rocker arms are the stoppers..you are using them are you not... also contact AEBS they modded there rocker arms some how ... maybe they well let you in on what they did...been to lazy and the car is to far apart then together to call them my self
That's exactly what I thought. That's the only reason in my head it would be doing that. Awesome to hear that the lash killer kit works with any step, I was told it wouldn't...but that was from the grapevine..not HKS. Stick those babies in and let me know how they go. I heard they're noisy...Please keep us informed!SILVIADRIFTR wrote: But I still can't figure out why the rockers would come out unless it is geting valve float at high rpms on the 2 step from it being so harsh.
The bronze/phosphor guides holds oil better than the normal bronze.USsil80 wrote:what is the advatige of the broze valve guides
There are at least 3 different versions of the SR rocker from the factory.USsil80 wrote:the only thing that i have seen for rocker arms are the stoppers..you are using them are you not... also contact AEBS they modded there rocker arms some how ... maybe they well let you in on what they did...been to lazy and the car is to far apart then together to call them my self
So are they different per application or is it from oldest to newest on production? Any idea? I am buying a whole new set.Nismo_Freak wrote:
There are at least 3 different versions of the SR rocker from the factory.
One thing I do know is the metal the rocker arms are made of are tiny pieces of metal that are pressed together. If you have ever seen one break you con tell. I don't think cryo-treating them will help when the rocker arm shoot out of it's seat and wedges itself beteen a cam and a valve sideways.justmerging wrote:Have you considered cryo-treating the rockers. I don't really know much about the process or if it can even be done on your valvetrain but from what I understand it basically "adjusts" the composition of the metal so that they are beefier. Maybe someone else has more imput on this, help me out.
I will never deal with JGY ever again. The only thing that I have from their handy work that really never gave me a problem is their fuel rail. Everything else was sent to the recycling center.s13sr20chris wrote:sorry, thread jack...hey genx,whats the story on your jgy screwup? if you already posted about it, how about a link?
I have read the article before. I did try launching at a lower rpm(around 6200) but the car would bog with 350whp. I think this may be related to the Unorthodox crank pulley that I am running, but haven't had a chance to swap back to the stock pulley to find out. The video in my sig is a launch at 6800 rpm but on 26x10.50 et streets with around 360whp. The car pulled a 1.61 60ft . I think another problem I have is the suspension. I have tein he coilovers on the car and the shocks are set at the softest setting in the front and the rear. I am not having a problem hooking with the slicks(26x10.50 etdrags) just keeping it from bogging at a lower rpm. My last 60ft, before the car went down, was a 1.57 60ft spinning the et streets with no antilag and 10lbs off the line. I run a 300zx trans that was modded into the car and since have had no problems with trans failure. I also don't run a clutch that has any slippage. I run the stage4 twin plate exedy(very harsh). One thing I would like to know is what rpm did Derek Greaser launch at to have the rpm's fall to 5500? And also what clutch he was running? Because even though you don't slip a clutch with the pedal, most single plate clutches holding anything over 300 whp have some type of slippage from pressure plate to disc. You also said I need to reconsider my tire size's. What tire sizes are suggested?f150intally wrote:this has been a problem for a long time with the sr. Two of my friends, Enthalpy and TNT, both popped rocker arms off at high rpms. Its not a matter of the rocker arm breaking. The problem is it pops off and that can cause it to break. Do some research, this has been discussed a lot.
as far as launching at 6900 rpm, you need to reconsider your tire sizes. TNT went 10.50 with a 1.65 60 ft and he didn't launch that high.
also, derek greaser cut a 1.49 60 ft with only 385whp and when 10.90. He landed the car in peak torque at around 5500rpm. he was using anti-lag and building 15psi on the line.
Check out my article on launching the 240sx.