Nice.Nameless EJ6 wrote:yup yup. check it out if ya want:
You said it.J-Spec Tuner wrote:No offense, but saying that FWD hondas are not good at turning is kind of ignorant.
Very true. You can put a dress on a pig, but it's still a pig.SILVER97LE wrote: 240's were built to be sports cars.
Honda civics will always be economy cars in my mind.
Tell me, what does RWD have that makes these "curves" so much more fun? You hit the throttle harder causing you to drift or spin out?base9se wrote:Glad you made the conversion to RWD. You'll enjoy the curves alot better than that crappy honda FWD. What's the skill in driving straightaways anyway?
I like what you said.J-Spec Tuner wrote:No offense, but saying that FWD hondas are not good at turning is kind of ignorant. Many hondas will whip a 240sx through the cones. Tire compound, brake bias and suspension settings matter alot more than what wheels do the accelerating.
An EK9 is a 97-00 RHD CTR with a B16b engine.. not avaliable here.The EJ6 is any USDM 96-00 Civic with a D16y7 engine.Doomed2Walk wrote:QQ, I'm not very knowledgeable on Hondas, so yeah... What's the difference b/w the EJ6 and the EK9?
Wow...this turned ugly fast. I agree that the Honda hate was uncalled for, but that's a little harsh.Nameless EJ6 wrote:BTW, 240's are not sportscars either in the US. They're a regular car blessed with RWD... Ofter overglorified by morons on RWD forums.Modified by Nameless EJ6 at 10:53 AM 9/15/2004
Sorry if it seemed harsh.. I'm jsut sick of seeing 240 owners talking down on Hondas when they haven't even owned a decently fast one with a good suspension and body setup.BadMojo wrote:
Wow...this turned ugly fast. I agree that the Honda hate was uncalled for, but that's a little harsh.
I don't know why everyone acts like the ITR is the greatest. They're slow. I laugh when a ITR tries to race me. I guess they handle well though? I don't care about handling.. hehe..J-Spec Tuner wrote:My one freind bought a 98 ITR (a real one) for $13,000 , its a pretty badass ride.
Well no ****, they don't run a 13.7 second quarter mile. Try 14.4-14.7. Yes they handle nicely, something a 240 just doesn't compete with. ITR's are remarkable cars.. if you've never driven one you won't know this.240SXer wrote:
I don't know why everyone acts like the ITR is the greatest. They're slow. I laugh when a ITR tries to race me. I guess they handle well though? I don't care about handling.. hehe..
Ya I'd believe that. It's competition for Z sales definetely. Just like bringing the ITR over here to the states again is too much competition for their other cars.. and they don't see alot of potential in sales with them.nismofly wrote:hey nameless i know a master nissan tech and he said that one of the reasons we didnt get the sr20 in the states is because then insurance companies would have charged unbelievable rates because the engine would make the car a sports car, this is on top of the sr20 silvia competing within nissan with the z32 being another reason