best turbo for a mellow torque curve on a CA18det??? POLL

Discuss topics related to the CA18DE and CA18DET series engines.
User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

DE pistons aren't 9.5:1. they're 10:1.

My pistons are basically a DE piston crown on a DET piston from CP. They were custom, but they have them on file now and I can get them whenever.

And yes, 10:1 compression + boost if fine on this motor, just be aware that you are going to need very high octane fuel.


Logan76
Posts: 7983
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:06 am
Car: Junk

Post

hell im soon to be running 10.4:1 CR with boost, but i wont gay this thread up with honda garbage.

User avatar
ca18detgabby
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:31 pm
Car: 92 Nissan S13 ca18det SOLD
03 Infiniti G35
Location: lake Mary FL
Contact:

Post

float_6969 wrote:DE pistons aren't 9.5:1. they're 10:1.

My pistons are basically a DE piston crown on a DET piston from CP. They were custom, but they have them on file now and I can get them whenever.

And yes, 10:1 compression + boost if fine on this motor, just be aware that you are going to need very high octane fuel.
according to the FAQ hey are 9.5:1

ive read it a bunch of times........ less sean was wrong?

User avatar
ca18detgabby
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:31 pm
Car: 92 Nissan S13 ca18det SOLD
03 Infiniti G35
Location: lake Mary FL
Contact:

Post

Logan76 wrote:hell im soon to be running 10.4:1 CR with boost, but i wont gay this thread up with honda garbage.
sorry I said honda first....... i is sorry.

Logan76
Posts: 7983
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:06 am
Car: Junk

Post

Lol its okay, everyone knows im a ricer with a junky Honda.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

I'm pretty sure it's wrong, but I can't verify it for 100% sure. The problem MAY be that the JDM RWD CA18DE didn't get the same compression as the USDM FWD CA18DE did.

I'd love to see a FSM for a pulsar. That would certainly settle it.

But simply looking at the amount of dome that my piston has, makes me think it's closer to 10:1.

User avatar
r34 gtr
Posts: 8909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 9:33 am
Car: 98 Nissan Frontier XE 4x4
95.5 Audi URS6 Avant 5spd
03 BMW 330i ZHP 6spd
89 Nissan 240SX base CA18DET
Location: Creepin' in your crawl space
Contact:

Post

Damn Julian, I had no idea my state was so well endowed with E85 fillup points. I might have to go get one of those flexfuel sensors sooner than I thought! I drive past several of those places on my way to and from school/home. Unfortunately there are no stations where I live (either place) just a bunch half way. I would probably only ever get to enjoy it on the interstate.

The tune would cost a lot then I assume, what with having to create two completely different maps and all. Still, sounds like an awesome way to get me a buttload of power.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

No, just one map. The sensor would add a correction factor to the primary map.

User avatar
ca18detgabby
Posts: 3329
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:31 pm
Car: 92 Nissan S13 ca18det SOLD
03 Infiniti G35
Location: lake Mary FL
Contact:

Post

r34 gtr wrote:Damn Julian, I had no idea my state was so well endowed with E85 fillup points. I might have to go get one of those flexfuel sensors sooner than I thought! I drive past several of those places on my way to and from school/home. Unfortunately there are no stations where I live (either place) just a bunch half way. I would probably only ever get to enjoy it on the interstate.

The tune would cost a lot then I assume, what with having to create two completely different maps and all. Still, sounds like an awesome way to get me a buttload of power.
buttload of boost............ similar power.

Logan76
Posts: 7983
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:06 am
Car: Junk

Post

Any of you guys consider meth/water injection? Help you out alot if your running high compression + boost.

User avatar
The_Chosen_One
Posts: 1664
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 2:05 pm
Car: 2009 Subaru Impreza 2.5i
Contact:

Post

Logan76 wrote:Any of you guys consider meth/water injection? Help you out alot if your running high compression + boost.

Logan76
Posts: 7983
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:06 am
Car: Junk

Post

LMFAO! that cat is hilarious!

Hey chosen one, I got a few quick ?'s for ya aboot powdercoating bro.

User avatar
The_Chosen_One
Posts: 1664
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 2:05 pm
Car: 2009 Subaru Impreza 2.5i
Contact:

Post



Fire away.

ser20det
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:22 pm
Car: Silvia K's 88

Post

ca18detgabby wrote:
buttload of boost............ similar power.
And what about engine response ?
Logan76 wrote:Any of you guys consider meth/water injection? Help you out alot if your running high compression + boost.
Sure, this is on my plan

User avatar
The_Chosen_One
Posts: 1664
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 2:05 pm
Car: 2009 Subaru Impreza 2.5i
Contact:

Post

ser20det wrote:
And what about engine response ?

Sure, this is on my plan

Logan76
Posts: 7983
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:06 am
Car: Junk

Post

whats your turn around like? I chemically stripped the whole cover today because I have to get some Tig welding done and the paint couldnt be on there anymore, so its down to bare bones. will that speed up the process any?

User avatar
The_Chosen_One
Posts: 1664
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 2:05 pm
Car: 2009 Subaru Impreza 2.5i
Contact:

Post

Logan76 wrote:whats your turn around like? I chemically stripped the whole cover today because I have to get some Tig welding done and the paint couldnt be on there anymore, so its down to bare bones. will that speed up the process any?

User avatar
Cams
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:42 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 200sx CA18(DET) RS13
2002 Mitsubishi Airtrek JDM 4G63T (wife)
2013 Scion FR-S
2016 Infiniti QX50
Location: Panama, Central America

Post

Just wondering, and don't take my comment wrong because Im not sure if it is a good idea at all, mixing the following items would achieve a responsive engine with 300whp like the OP wants?

- Forged CP pistons with 9.0:1 compression- Mild head work camshaft + adjustable sprockets. Maybe just the DE exhaust camshaft trick. - GT2860RS with .48 AR (listed on ATPTurbo)- and a good tune for 18-20psi

At least this is what I would like to do. But I don't know if it would take me near 300whp, specially without having to change to higher octane fuel.

User avatar
The_Chosen_One
Posts: 1664
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 2:05 pm
Car: 2009 Subaru Impreza 2.5i
Contact:

Post

Cams wrote:Just wondering, and don't take my comment wrong because Im not sure if it is a good idea at all, mixing the following items would achieve a responsive engine with 300whp like the OP wants?

- Forged CP pistons with 9.0:1 compression- Mild head work camshaft + adjustable sprockets. Maybe just the DE exhaust camshaft trick. - GT2860RS with .48 AR (listed on ATPTurbo)- and a good tune for 18-20psi

At least this is what I would like to do. But I don't know if it would take me near 300whp, specially without having to change to higher octane fuel.

User avatar
r34 gtr
Posts: 8909
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 9:33 am
Car: 98 Nissan Frontier XE 4x4
95.5 Audi URS6 Avant 5spd
03 BMW 330i ZHP 6spd
89 Nissan 240SX base CA18DET
Location: Creepin' in your crawl space
Contact:

Post

Ahaha the raccoon is funny as hell.

Cams, sure, why not. I would want a bigger AR though. Why not get the .64? I know they have it.

User avatar
Cams
Posts: 307
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 3:42 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 200sx CA18(DET) RS13
2002 Mitsubishi Airtrek JDM 4G63T (wife)
2013 Scion FR-S
2016 Infiniti QX50
Location: Panama, Central America

Post

They list 48, 63, 64, 72, 82 and 86 A/R. I thought it was something like the smaller the A/R the earlier it it will spool but will lower the max boost pressure it can flow, and viceversa. Again, thinking on engine responsiveness at low/mid rpms.

Sorry I only understand like 15% of the dynamics behind a Turbo. Something like: No boost -> lag -> boost ->

Btw, why would they list 63 and 64 options?

User avatar
mbmbmb23
Posts: 949
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 6:39 pm

Post

Cams wrote:They list 48, 63, 64, 72, 82 and 86 A/R. I thought it was something like the smaller the A/R the earlier it it will spool but will lower the max boost pressure it can flow, and viceversa. Again, thinking on engine responsiveness at low/mid rpms.

Sorry I only understand like 15% of the dynamics behind a Turbo. Something like: No boost -> lag -> boost ->

Btw, why would they list 63 and 64 options?
I think .64 is found on T2 and .63 is found on T3 turbos.

boost_boy
Posts: 7051
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 7:28 am
Car: B12 sentra w/built CA18DET, B12 sentra w/fully-built CA18DET, S13 coupe w/ CA18DET, S13 hatch w/CA18DET, 2002 maxima SE
Location: Miami, FL.
Contact:

Post

float_6969 wrote:I'm pretty sure it's wrong, but I can't verify it for 100% sure. The problem MAY be that the JDM RWD CA18DE didn't get the same compression as the USDM FWD CA18DE did.

I'd love to see a FSM for a pulsar. That would certainly settle it.

But simply looking at the amount of dome that my piston has, makes me think it's closer to 10:1.
USDM ca16 and ca18 got 10:1 compression ratio. JDM ca18de'sgot the 9.5:1 ratio, but had better fuel maps.

Dee

User avatar
The_Chosen_One
Posts: 1664
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 2:05 pm
Car: 2009 Subaru Impreza 2.5i
Contact:

Post

[quote=""Boost Boy""]USDM ca16 and ca18 got 10:1 compression ratio. JDM ca18de'sgot the 9.5:1 ratio, but had better fuel maps.Dee

[/quote]


Return to “CA18DE / CA18DET Forum”