Is this a typo or did yours have a diesel in it?darinz wrote:(150kgs lighter than the Patrol motor)
If you're not planning to modify the engine, you don't need an aftermarket ECU. I hate people who think that just because a different engine is going in that you can't use the new engine's factory ECU. In almost all cases, this is absolute rubbish.Robstar wrote:The guy mentioned if I'd be looking at many aftermarket parts such as the ECU, - Rob
Yeah it was a TD42 which wiegh 356kg's!mtcookson wrote:
Is this a typo or did yours have a diesel in it?
That's YOUR boat? I've been watching that video for the last few months whenever I get bored with my project. I went to the Nizpro website at the end of the video but didn't see anything talking about that project.gianavel wrote:Power potential?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_cRQhW7nj8
Need I say more.
I built this boat, (not the motor just the boat). But I had the good fortune to get to play with when it was running, as we had to help set it up. And it is a demon. Basically he takes on 8.1+ litre twin turbo big block puppies and goes well! that's a 4.5TT vs 8-8.5TT motors!This motor has seen 1500hp on a engine dyno! And it's turn keys and purrs like a factory Q45, no word of a lie. It has run in excess of 60 race hours without a hitch.
The VHs are lighter than RBs. That's a fact. Just look into the history of these motors and you'll keep coming across one name, Cosworth. Cosworth were heavily involved in the design and development of Nissan's V8 motors . Basically look at a Cosworth "DF" series motors and you'll be looking at the "parentage" of the VH motors.So in terms of potential it's lighter ,stronger and the power potential is insane!
After market parts? That's a bigger problem. It's taken me a while to find guys who can supply stuff at a decent price. Be careful a few guys out there thing they are the be all end all when it comes to these motors and they want to charge accordingly. But if you look long enough you'll get what you need.
Don't be afraid of what people say about these motors. Ignorance is bliss for them, when you start to pull yours down you'll see what we I mean. The word over-engineered comes to mind. And not in a bad way
If you would like any other data please don't hesitate to email me and we can chat some more.
Cheers
We'll not MY boat. I just built the floatie part Engine wise; -Forged bottom end-Heads got a clean up but nothing major, she literally sounds like a Q45 with a bigger exhaust. It's that smooth!-Basically fully blue-printed. But it's not as much as you might think.I don't have all the details, but that is what I know. She still runs a wet sump set up etc. Nothing was touched that didn't have to be. The bottom end got the attention mainly to lower the CR. Everything balanced and polished etc... the usual.tmorgan4 wrote:
That's YOUR boat? I've been watching that video for the last few months whenever I get bored with my project. I went to the Nizpro website at the end of the video but didn't see anything talking about that project.
1500hp? What has been done internally?
Exactly,I have been told they have been focusing on the actual combustion chamber design. They reckon they found another few horses there. But who knows!Nizpro are actually building a VK56 powered monster of a boat at the moment. Its the same boat as the Orange one with the 45 in it. It was actually built to take a Jet turbine motor, but it was then sold to Nizpro.Mettler wrote:R&D on the VH engine is still relatively scarce, so it wouldn't surprise me if they're keeping it largely under wraps for that reason.
The VH41 being talked about in that quote is the VH41 available overseas... not the VH41 offered over here. Definitely do not get a US spec VH41, they are nothing close to the VH45 and the overseas VH41.Robstar wrote:Just need clarification on this statement: Found on another forum by another user.
"VH45 tends to be most people's pick, but that's because they approach the situation with little prior knowledge, thinking "bigger is better". The extra 400cc is the ONLY thing better about the VH45, the VH41 is so much better setup and easier to fit, and produces the same power by revving a bit higher. Factory redline on the VH45 is 6900, and on the VH41 it's 7500. Funny that, because both are capable of revving to nearly 8000RPM reliably. Hypereutectic pistons, strong rods, and steel crank + highly balanced motor will let you do that."
Some pro's have advised me the VH41 would be a better overall choice than the VH45 @ tenegah as well~
Not only that, but I've read alot of posts by a user on another forum called unharmonix, definitely knows what he's doing and putting VH45 internals in a VH41 doesn't sound like a bad idea. There is also someone who can get me a VH41 Half-cut, for quite cheap at that.
Modified by Robstar at 5:15 AM 1/3/2008
I love that car... a tube chassis Z32 race car that weighs less than 2,000 lbsevildky wrote:the L6 is a proven power plant last campaigned by nissan in the Z32 in GT3 road racing in the 90's nearly 10 years after they stopped making the L28!
Hi,evildky do you perhaps have any info on this car.i have seen one and very curious.sorry about going of the topic.Thanks.evildky wrote:so your local race shop isn't too familar with the s30 chassis? these cars have recieved about every concievable swap since they hit the market, datsun even made a few with the old 70's model president v8 (Y40) in them.............
This left me a little confused, so it's the US spec VH41 that was no good, but everywhere else, it was fine?mtcookson wrote:
The VH41 being talked about in that quote is the VH41 available overseas... not the VH41 offered over here. Definitely do not get a US spec VH41, they are nothing close to the VH45 and the overseas VH41.
the T5 came in the 82-83 280ZXT with a bellhousing that fits any L series engine, the 84-86 300ZXT also came with a T5 but with a bellhousing to fit the VG series engines, it might fit the twin cam VG30DETT but I don't know if it'll mesh with the twincan flywheelperana wrote:thanks alot.ive been into this engine for years now,but never got around to doing any thing.the power of a ttz32 and turbo vh45 basically made me forget about them.i have a borg warner t5 box that aparently comes off one and a brand new cam.i'm gonna see if i can get a motor now and start a old school datsun project.thanks again
Ahhh thanks for letting me know, just looked up a fair bit about both engines, good thing we don't have US versions of cars or car engines here, mostly Japan imports. I think I only have access to the JDM VH41.mtcookson wrote:
Correct. The US VH41 isn't supposed to be quite as good as the US VH45 and JDM VH41.
Ahhhh, I didn't realize you were in Australia. WA made me think Washington USA.Robstar wrote:Ahhh thanks for letting me know, just looked up a fair bit about both engines, good thing we don't have US versions of cars or car engines here, mostly Japan imports. I think I only have access to the JDM VH41.
there are 2 different 280ZX flywheels, the T5 was on the turbo cars and fits a 240mm flywheel, the na's use the same flywheel and clutch but different trans, 2 seater n/a's and all 70-78 used a 225mm disk, the splining for all clutch disks from 70-96 are all the same but the disk diameters changed a lot (z31's got 240mm and 250mm ( I believe the z32's used the same sizes but with beefier pressure plates)), and all 70-89 flywheels are 6 bolt, 90-96 are 8 bolt, for the VH you need the 8 bolt flywheel found on the Z32, the T5 shaft will engage either the n/a or TT clutchdisk but of course you'll have to adapt the trans to fit the block which is the whole issue I have with the VHperana wrote:yes, thats correct its from a 280zx but the flywheel fits? i just went throu al my junk under the house and found a 650cfm holy,cam.8.8mm accel leads.trying to get hold of a guy who has one $250nz and orderd one from a importer who siad if theres one japan he'll get it.now what car to put it in?cheers