Yea I get that quite a bit! hahaha~mtcookson wrote:
Ahhhh, I didn't realize you were in Australia. WA made me think Washington USA.
that would assume taht the bearing retainer is the same diameter, I got a bud doing the VH swap with a GM T5, the bearing retainer is a radically different diameter and the bellhousing from the auto is too long so the imput shaft won't engage the pilot bearing, looks like he's gona have to mill the back off the auto bellshousing and weld on a plate with the correct diameter hole and bolt holes, the trick is getting the thing centered on the vh bellhousing, as well as converting to an internal type hydraulic TO bearing as there si no provision for a clutch fork in an auto bellhousingperana wrote:yo, checked the clutch its 240 mm same as na z32.the t5 is realy simple to adapt to other motors,bcause of the round bearing retainer.so all i need is the auto bell housing from the y44.i have done this before and its no big deal.i'll try to post some pics later(i have trouble with this but will try).cheers
^^ yeah that's just me posting on SDU ages ago, see my e-mail address in my profileRobstar wrote:"VH45 tends to be most people's pick, but that's because they approach the situation with little prior knowledge, thinking "bigger is better". The extra 400cc is the ONLY thing better about the VH45, the VH41 is so much better setup and easier to fit, and produces the same power by revving a bit higher. Factory redline on the VH45 is 6900, and on the VH41 it's 7500. Funny that, because both are capable of revving to nearly 8000RPM reliably. Hypereutectic pistons, strong rods, and steel crank + highly balanced motor will let you do that."
Not only that, but I've read alot of posts by a user on another forum called unharmonix
No one is trying to discourage his swap. He asked about the benefits of the VH as compared to many more popular engines, and seeing as his car came with the L26 (bottom of the barrel in the L6 line of engines). It only makes since to provide him with the facts about the L6. Many younger people don't realize the true potential of the L6. As for the VH verses the L, there is no replacement for displacement, period! The more cubes you got the more potential power you can make, if the n/a L6 can make nearly 90 whp per liter then then the 4.5 should be north of 400 whp, and if you add a turbo it grows exponentially.Mettler wrote:It looks to me like some people are trying to discourage Robstar from doing his VH transplant & attempting to convince him to use an inferior engine for..... some reason?
Since a manual conversion is neither difficult nor that expensive, I don't think it's a valid reason to pimp the L series engine as a better swap than the VH when the VH is clearly echelons above the L series in every department.
Spanna Spinna from Auckland swapped a standard VH45 into his Cefiro and tuned it with a link computer.... put down 300rwhp! So never mind antiquated motors capable of handling ~300rwhp when the VH45 already does it standard with a tune, and has a significantly wider & more driveable powerband at that due to the torque.
Oh, and the L series isn't a V8, and is simply less awesome.
^^ yeah that's just me posting on SDU ages ago, see my e-mail address in my profile