Movingviolation240 wrote:I think your missing my point, I just want to nuke france....
But seriously I don't think homosexuality should be regonized as a relegion. Think of it this way (since the moral arguement and the religious one dosn't work around here) you are goign to be paying more on your insurance to suport some gay guy's husband because he got sick. End of story..... simple economics.
But the fact remains that I dont suport that lifestyle and I don't want to see it become anymore mainstream than it is. If I decided tomorrow that I wanted to have sex with 10 year old girls because "that is my sexual preference and I can't help that I was born that way" would it be ok for me to do that? What if I wanted to have sex with animals? Where do you draw the line?
Paul
aznromeox wrote:I am not very religous and am not a Homosexual...
Personally, my belief is that If you love something thats your decision. I don't think religion should be involved but no matter how we put it, but that fact is will be. The President and "nearly" all pollations are regligous. I havn't heard of many that arn't. It shouldn't be banned. Thats like saying we should bring back segregation. Do people have that much hate in people. I feel if you vote yes to ban gay marriages you have hate in a certain type of people. There is no priniple behind all of this. I think a men and a women is more "functional" but doesn't mean that homosexuals don't have the same "loving-caring" relationship. Is the idea of seeing something different bad?
This is from a 16 year olds perspective showing that Generation X is not the stereotypical view some people see.-Ron
big jon's 240 wrote:You can fly?
Quote »2. the one reason that i personally don't understand peoples oppositon to homosexual marriages is this: what difference does it make to you?? if you aren't directly affected by this, then why should you care?? [/quote]yashin wrote:i don't think this issue should be based on feelings, morals, and opinions, these are all very arbitary, it should be based on laws, and peoples rights
Bubba1 wrote:I think this issue is a classic reason why there is and should continue to be separation of church and state.
Sopdadope wrote:Speaking of foreign perspectives, the Bush administration just made a laughing-stock out of itself by even addressing the issue of gay marriages when there's a laundry list of issues that carry greater salience. .
Movingviolation240 wrote:hmmm be nice, I'd hate to see "things" happen to you...... bad things :bash
Sopdadope wrote:
BTW, is that supposed to be a threat? Go ahead and ban me, there's no way I could pry myself from this site anyway (jungles of southeast asia are a callin').