Beautiful Q.....first gen
Wes,Excuse me while I shovel the BS out of that comment, so I may reply to it.
You have NO right to make comments which are intentional in their premise. You don't want to start this conversation again?? DON'T SAY THOSE LITTLE BS REMARKS THEN
I will continue to hammer on them, until you stop saying them
Stopwatch means jack ****
DEAL WITH IT
Every mag you have on your site has slow times for the 94+
So stop saying otherwise.
There is a notable difference. Less weight, stronger engine, better aerodynamics.. It's all there. All noted before. STOP with your comments, and this conversation DIES TODAY
RSI spent more in mods then the cost of your sludged up blown up Q. He can't get his Q 0-60 in 6 seconds, so stop throwing blatant propaganda out there. Your Stock sludged up blown up Q isn't accelerating anywhere near that.
Hitman didn't post that. Hitman has post up actual 1/4 mile times, and I believe times generated by his GTECH. Both FAR more reliable then your lame stopwatch.
R/T 1995 Q45T
0-60 in 7.9 seconds1/4 mile [email protected]
DEAL WITH IT
94+ Qs lost .5 seconds 0-60 and in the 1/4 mileThey lost between 3-5 mph in the 1/4 mile
Every test ever printed indicates this. Your stopwatch means nothing.
That .5 and 3-5 mph is a huge difference in actual realized gain/loss on the street or strip
I'm sick of propaganda, I may be abrasive and harsh, but anytime I see an infactual statement posted by fanboys, I will retaliate. You don't like it, remove me off this forum, you have before
Stop backing off from your statements.
I don't start threads or make insidious incorrect comments that I know would piss you off, do I. I don't say what an ugly ripoff volvo grill you have, or all the loss of speed or aerodynamics continually. I only say these things in REPLY to your comments
SO STOP SAYING THEM, IF YOU TRULY WANT ME TO END THIS ARGUMENT, KNOCK IT OFF
GET IT? GOT IT
G O O D
And finally
You questioned how well I maintained my Q, because I said my 91 was significantly quicker. Well guess what I maintain my fine.. How about yours? Oh wait, it doesn't run. I refrained from my comments, I deleted my negative posts, yet you continue to try to incite these remarks from me.
All I see is you continue to make remarks, you know will start an arguement, then you try to call an end to it. I don't generate this, I reply to your BS.
I will say nothing more. You can post all day on this, I don't give a rats ARSE.
You want to continue to make incorrect fanboys comments, then this will rage on and on
Modified by 1992Q45A at 2:59 AM 9/15/2004
You have NO right to make comments which are intentional in their premise. You don't want to start this conversation again?? DON'T SAY THOSE LITTLE BS REMARKS THEN
I will continue to hammer on them, until you stop saying them
Stopwatch means jack ****
DEAL WITH IT
Every mag you have on your site has slow times for the 94+
So stop saying otherwise.
There is a notable difference. Less weight, stronger engine, better aerodynamics.. It's all there. All noted before. STOP with your comments, and this conversation DIES TODAY
RSI spent more in mods then the cost of your sludged up blown up Q. He can't get his Q 0-60 in 6 seconds, so stop throwing blatant propaganda out there. Your Stock sludged up blown up Q isn't accelerating anywhere near that.
Hitman didn't post that. Hitman has post up actual 1/4 mile times, and I believe times generated by his GTECH. Both FAR more reliable then your lame stopwatch.
R/T 1995 Q45T
0-60 in 7.9 seconds1/4 mile [email protected]
DEAL WITH IT
94+ Qs lost .5 seconds 0-60 and in the 1/4 mileThey lost between 3-5 mph in the 1/4 mile
Every test ever printed indicates this. Your stopwatch means nothing.
That .5 and 3-5 mph is a huge difference in actual realized gain/loss on the street or strip
I'm sick of propaganda, I may be abrasive and harsh, but anytime I see an infactual statement posted by fanboys, I will retaliate. You don't like it, remove me off this forum, you have before
Stop backing off from your statements.
I don't start threads or make insidious incorrect comments that I know would piss you off, do I. I don't say what an ugly ripoff volvo grill you have, or all the loss of speed or aerodynamics continually. I only say these things in REPLY to your comments
SO STOP SAYING THEM, IF YOU TRULY WANT ME TO END THIS ARGUMENT, KNOCK IT OFF
GET IT? GOT IT
G O O D
And finally
You questioned how well I maintained my Q, because I said my 91 was significantly quicker. Well guess what I maintain my fine.. How about yours? Oh wait, it doesn't run. I refrained from my comments, I deleted my negative posts, yet you continue to try to incite these remarks from me.
All I see is you continue to make remarks, you know will start an arguement, then you try to call an end to it. I don't generate this, I reply to your BS.
I will say nothing more. You can post all day on this, I don't give a rats ARSE.
You want to continue to make incorrect fanboys comments, then this will rage on and on
Modified by 1992Q45A at 2:59 AM 9/15/2004
-
elwesso
- Posts: 30810
- Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:52 pm
- Car: 94 Infiniti Q45t 5 spd
2007 BMW M Coupe
2007 Infiniti G35 S 6MT - Location: Indiana
- Contact:
Re: (1992Q45A)
Im not going to reply to that, but I will point out one thing...
Anyone have may 1993 motor trend??
1994 Infiniti Q45 (for the record, 1994 Q45 produciton started 2/93, if Im wrong please correct me)
0-60 in 7.2 seconds1/4 Mile: 15.4
Anyone have may 1993 motor trend??
1994 Infiniti Q45 (for the record, 1994 Q45 produciton started 2/93, if Im wrong please correct me)
0-60 in 7.2 seconds1/4 Mile: 15.4
