You will defenetly need to role out to the west coast. You will have plenty of time to save up some time and money. My project wont be done for a few months.AppleBonker wrote:
Making me want to take a trip out to the west coast once you both have your stuff together. I'd love to hear and see both installs. I also really want to check out Blake's car in person. Very tempting... If only I had the money and vacation time to just up and head out there!
Going back to the MB tweets and mids? What kind of music do you listen to? That's what makes it tough for me, cause I really listen to everything.rjdmmfl1 wrote:anyway, I'm going back with the custom A pillars, tweets and midrange in the A pillars, 8" dynaudio midbass in floorboard, and the audio control DQXS to clean up the sound...
for me, I think this will give me a nice balance between SQ and SPL...
Believe me, I want to. I'm sure I could save up the cash, but I'm also trying to save up for some new wheels and other performance mods. I really need to get on this group buy for the Eibachs, plus I might as well do the RSB while I'm doing the springs (already have RL endlinks to go with the rest, just need to put them on). After the suspension and wheels, I really want a new exhaust and intake. Plus I want to work on fabbing my own projectors and LED tails. Add it all up and I'm gonna be broke forever!Infantry1327 wrote:
You will defenetly need to role out to the west coast. You will have plenty of time to save up some time and money. My project wont be done for a few months.
no its a power stage 2(sorry...just refer to it that way cause i'm used to the retail side) and i do know what an active crossover is, but why don't you use a 360 or cleansweep, etc. instead??? just not gonna give you the tuning control/flexibility you want???rjdmmfl1 wrote:
Applebonker hit the nail on the head, you my friend have obviously never done active crossovers before, but its cool, that's how we all learn....
the passive crossovers do the job, but very poorly SQ wise... in order to optimize sound, active crossovers are the way to go... I won't get too much in depth regarding this, but basicly, with passive crossover, you try to filter out the complete spectrum of frequencies AFTER they leave the amp... almost impossible to do cleanly
with active crossovers, the filtering, EQ, and crossover freq. occurs BEFORE the signal gets to the amp... thus, only the exact frequencies you want will go to each individual speaker... this cleans up the music and prodices more "studio quality" sound... that is what I was missing
So again, when going with an active crossover setup, you don't use the passive crosovers at all (neither the ones from the MB quart or the ones from the Boston Pro 60's)
Also, you will blow your stage 2 subs sky high with the T2000-1bd... that's WAAAYYYYY too much power for that sub... did you mean the T2 subwoofer or the P2 subwoofer.... most folks don't refer to the T2 as a stage 2, that terminology is reserved for the Punch line of subs... and no offense, but the punch line is not a very good line of sub! Not just regarding power handling, but the build , basket, spider, frame, are all sub par IMO... I've taken all of the Rockford punch subs apart and examined every last detail!
Those two you mentioned don't offer near the amount of tuning that Doc will be able to utilize with what he plans on running. Actually, I don't even know how you'd run a 3-way active front soundstage off a 360 or cleansweep. You'd probably still have to control a lot of the input/outputs from the amps. It'd be doable, but for this case, the DQXS will make it a lot easier.xXxCrumpsCoupexXx wrote:no its a power stage 2(sorry...just refer to it that way cause i'm used to the retail side) and i do know what an active crossover is, but why don't you use a 360 or cleansweep, etc. instead??? just not gonna give you the tuning control/flexibility you want???
As Applebonker mentioned, the cleensweep plaes in comparison to the DQXS. Applebonker's H701 is widely regarded as the best EQ/active crossover on the market, but it really works best with Alpine headunits! Without that, I would need an extra Alpine controller, and then I would have two colume controls, and its just not worth itxXxCrumpsCoupexXx wrote:no its a power stage 2(sorry...just refer to it that way cause i'm used to the retail side) and i do know what an active crossover is, but why don't you use a 360 or cleansweep, etc. instead??? just not gonna give you the tuning control/flexibility you want???
I'm already enjoying the amount of control you're going to have over your system. And I don't even get to enjoy it. This is gonna be fun!rjdmmfl1 wrote:The rockford 3sixty.2 would be fine for a 2 way component setup, but not a three way setup... with the DQXS, I have 6 RCA inputs (FL, FR, RL, RR, C, SUB) and EIGHT outputs.. this is what you need for a 3 way component setup!
Naww man, I'm definately open to suggestions... my audio guy tuned them, but he has a different ear than me... I could definately go a bit lower with the midbass so that there's not as much overlap... still tweaking it , but that's where I left it right now.... will finish tweeking befor the meet tomorrow... I'm 1000% happeier with the sound!AppleBonker wrote:Glad your happy. If you play around with the tuning a bit more, try crossing the midbass/sub a bit lower. I've got mine at 65Hz and it sounds amazing. I love the sound of the bass coming from up front.
Also, is there a reason you're taking the midbass up to 500 Hz? If the front midranges are dipping down to 160Hz, you've got a decent size frequency band that's being reproduced by two drivers. Every thing about going up to about 200 with the midbass and 200 to 3.5 with the midranges? Might make it sound a little cleaner. I could easily be wrong though...
And this is precisely my point. I'm glad that you are happier.rjdmmfl1 wrote:I'm 1000% happeier with the sound!
I went back, adjusted the levels again, took the midbass down to 50 HZ (hell, its a subwoofer so why not) and cut it off at the amp at 300HZ...AppleBonker wrote:Yeah, dude. I'm just offering up some suggestions. I'm by no means telling you that you're wrong. Just giving some suggestions to try. Obviously stick with what sounds best to you!
And this is precisely my point. I'm glad that you are happier.
Haha... welcome to the world of pure audio bliss. Having the ability to control stuff like that is wonderful. It will allow you to play with tuning the system in ways you never previously thought possible. Plus, keeping bass up front is awesome!rjdmmfl1 wrote: Active crossover w/ Digital EQ FTMFGDW ..... dam*it Applebonker, why didn't you tell me this system could sound so much better and cleaner????