Apple wants 'stolen' iPhone 4G prototype back from Gizmodo

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
lino
Posts: 3533
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 7:48 am
Car: 1991 Q45a Fed-Spec, IQP/White, Texasoil 9 Accumulator Recharge, '93 TCU 1st Gear Start, JWFSB, B&M 70268 Transmission Cooler, BBS Forged Wheels, DRLs, Silverstars, Tint, Very Well Serviced.
Contact:

Post

New iphone Gizmodo: Apple wants 'stolen' iPhone 4G prototype back from Gizmodo

20 April, 2010

New York: New iphone Gizmodo: Apple wants 'stolen' iPhone 4G prototype back from Gizmodo. Apple has sent a letter to Gizmodo's editorial director Brain Lam demanding return of its iPhone 4G prototype. The tech website has had in possession of Apple's next-generation iPhone's prototype, allegedly left by an Apple engineer in a German beer garden in Redwood City, near San Francisco. The sudden move from the side of Apple strengthens the argument that the device is an original prototype of its proposed iPhone 4G, widely believed to be rolled out in June.

In a letter directed to Brian, Apple's legal team required that they want the device immediately back. Replaying to the letter, Brain wrote in a blog post on Gizmodo that they are willing to give back the device to its owners. Brain mentioned an address, where Apple people can contact to collect iPhone 4G prototype. Doubts are there that the device with Gizmodo may not be an original one and Apple will be trying to end the popularity of prototype of another device.

Nick Denton of Gawker Media, which publishes Gizmodo said that it has possessed the iPhone 4G prototype for $5000. The device was collected by some other person from the bar and he sold it to Gizmodo. Gawker Media is well-known for possessing devices with the smell of gossips at any cost. It was further reported that the same person has also attempted to sell the device to another tech web site Engadget. But, it is said that Engadeget rejected the offer in fear of legal issues.

However, Gizmodo has benefited from the business getting more than one million visitors to its site. With the images of iPhone 4G posted on the site, its popularity has considerably raised in the U.S. and world, analysts said.

Source: http://www.khabrein.info/news/New_iphon ... 271798383/

How is the 4G different?
* Front-facing video chat camera
* Larger lens on back-camera with flash
* Micro-SIM like iPad (safer and greater phonebook storage)
* Aluminium border around entire case
* 3-5 grams heavier
* 16% larger battery
* Smaller internal components


Image
Last edited by lino on Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:48 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
lino
Posts: 3533
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 7:48 am
Car: 1991 Q45a Fed-Spec, IQP/White, Texasoil 9 Accumulator Recharge, '93 TCU 1st Gear Start, JWFSB, B&M 70268 Transmission Cooler, BBS Forged Wheels, DRLs, Silverstars, Tint, Very Well Serviced.
Contact:

Post

Revealed: The hapless Apple engineer who lost top-secret 4G iPhone prototype after a beer-fuelled night out

By David Gardner In Los Angeles
Last updated at 5:50 AM on 21st April 2010

It has happened to most of us at some point: you arrive home after a night out and can’t remember what on earth you did with your phone.

But - unluckily for this man - a mobile left behind on a bar stool at a German beer garden in Redwood City, California, has set alarm bells ringing with an intrigue worthy of the Cold War.

For a website is claiming that the forgotten phone wasn’t just any old mobile. Gadget blog Gizmodo says it was a secret prototype of the next generation of the iPhone.

And if so, Apple employee Gray Powell has just made his 27th birthday unforgettable.

Image

Unwise: Apple employee Gray Powell, believed to have left a prototype of the new iPhone in a bar

Image

The mobile which was left behind on a bar stool by an Apple employee at a German beer garden in California

________________________________________________________________________
According to media reports in the U.S., Apple employee Gray Powell apparently left the iPhone behind after celebrating his 27th birthday at the Gourmet Haus Staudt bar, not far from the computer giant’s Cupertino, California headquarters.

Gizmodo said the person who found the phone claimed it was logged into Powell’s Facebook account and the last post on the social networking site was said to be: ‘I underestimated how good German beer is.’

After trying unsuccessfully to return the iPhone to its owner, the finder sold it to a 'mysterious middleman' who then sold it to the website for $5,000 (£3,250), Gizmodo editorial director Brian Lam said.

Mr Lam said the phone was shut down remotely by Apple, adding to suspicions that the phone held secrets the company didn’t want exposed.

Image

Already a T-shirt marking Gray Powell's error is on sale

Image

Gizmodo have published the letter they say they received from Apple asking for the prototype device back
________________________________________________________________________

Since posting pictures of the device online, the website, little known outside the hi-tech industry, has had more than three million hits in just 12 hours.

And it has triggered a guessing game over whether the new iPhone is genuine, how it got into the hands of the website and what sort of punishment the highly secretive Apple bosses might mete out to the software engineer apparently responsible for losing it.

Photographs posted of the device show a more angular model than the traditional iPhone with square corners and aluminum edges. Technical experts claim the case - similar to the older iPhone 3GS – was perfect camouflage for a prototype.

‘This may not be the final design for the next iPhone, but the fact that they built a fake case to make it look like the earlier iPhone, that says a lot,’ Brian Tong, editor for Cnet tech site, told ABC News.

The phone had a camera with a flash on the back with a bigger lens than the existing iPhone for better photo quality.

The front also sported a camera, which could indicate a video- conferencing capability for future models. On top of the device was a second microphone, possibly for noise cancellation.

The massive online interest in the prototype mystery prompted speculation that the whole thing may have been a marketing ploy to set up the launch of a new iPhone.

Apple’s initial silence over the find only fed the suspicions. But last night, Gizmodo said it finally heard from the company’s lawyers.

‘It has come to our attention that Gizmodo is in possession of a device that belongs to Apple,’ wrote Apple’s senior counsel.

Image

The phone says XXGB on the back, however rumours are circulating that the new iPhone 4G will have 64GB of memory

________________________________________________________________________

‘This letter constitutes a formal request that you return the device the Apple. Please let me know where to pick up the unit.’

Mr Lam said the mobile was returned to Apple with a note saying: ‘I hope you take it easy on the kid who lost it. I don’t think he loves anything more than Apple.’

Under Californian law Gizmodo could be charged with received stolen goods.

While the outer packaging of the phone was rather rough and ready, Gizmodo have insisted that the hardware is anything but.

The screen has an improved display with a higher resolution so that individual pixels are not discernible.

The phone measures 4.5"x2.31"x0.37" and weighs 140 grams. The 3GS weighs 135 grams.

The battery 5.25 WHr at 3.7V, compared to the 3GS battery, which is 4.51 WHr at 3.7V.

On the back of the phone, it said it was XX GB, but Gizmodo were unable to see how large the memory was as they believe Apple had killed the phone's 4.0 operating system after it went missing.

The iPhone 4G is expected to hit stores worldwide in June, according to the latest blog speculation and will be on the Verizon network in the US.

This was given some credence by the CEO of Canadian carrier SaskTel, who said in an interview: 'The good news is that (Apple) is coming out with a new version of the iPhone in the June timeframe and they're going to put us on that. So we're quite excited about that.'

Another tantalising piece of evidence that the iPhone 4G is nearing release is the new 4.0 operating system, announced last week, which would incorporate features such as multi-tasking into the current iPhone 3GS model.

Last week Apple announced the UK launch of the long-awaited iPad with Wi-Fi would be delayed by a month as demand had outstripped supply in the US.

However the US will receive the iPad 3G version on April 30.

Image

The phone weighs 140grams which is five grams more than the 3GS

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... zmodo.html

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Was this article translated from fish or something? Reading it makes my head hurt.

Anyway, I was wondering how long it'd be before this happened. At first, I figured the whole "found in a bar" bit was just made up to help the headlines. But once I realized it wasn't a joke, I figured Apple'd be working to shut Gizmodo up ASAP. They actually took a lot longer than I expected.

User avatar
Rex
Posts: 16845
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 6:50 pm
Car: None
Location: South of ATL
Contact:

Post

Read this on Yahoo! on my iTouch this morning.

From the pics it the edges have an iPad look, IMHO, but I'll wait and see what features/benefits actually make it to market.

As much of an Apple gadgetry fan as I've become over the years, I still can't bring myself to jump on the AT&T network. Hopefully, the Verizon rumors are true.

User avatar
AppleBonker
Posts: 17313
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:40 am
Car: Useful: 2011 Nissan Titan Pro-4x
Daily: 2003 Honda Accord EX-L Coupe
Hers: 2014 Nissan Rogue SL AWD
Location: NW Indiana

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:Anyway, I was wondering how long it'd be before this happened. At first, I figured the whole "found in a bar" bit was just made up to help the headlines. But once I realized it wasn't a joke, I figured Apple'd be working to shut Gizmodo up ASAP. They actually took a lot longer than I expected.
Didn't Giz really only have the phone for a week? I know Apple has a stellar legal team, but putting the clamps on something like this in under a week is pretty tough. Also, given that Giz cracked it open and explored everything about it immediately, once Apple went after them it gave validity to the assumptions that this was, in fact, the next gen iphone (or at least a close prototype to the final product). Additionally, the guy who found the phone supposedly attempted to give it back to Apple before selling it to Gizmodo. But, since you can't just call up Stevey, all the reps he/she got in contact with thought the "iphone prototype" was a joke.

I'm more interested to see what happens between Gizmodo and Apple in the future. I think Giz has been VERY pro-Apple, but now Apple probably hates them. Giz has been getting invites to Apple press conferences, but does that change now? And if so, how do you stop those editors from attending under the guise that they work for Lifehacker or one of the other gawker sites? Ban all gawker writers from Apple events? It could get a bit interesting.

User avatar
RobPaulson
Posts: 6577
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:04 am
Car: 2013 Subaru WRX

Post

IMO, this was leaked on purpose. you don't 'forget' one of the most (perceived to be) secret devices your company is developing at a bar in the middle of the day. sorry, doesnt happen.

They leaked it on purpose to thwart the upcoming releases of the incredible and other comparable android devices at the end of this month. Apple has released their new phone around every july, and they don't want to lose all their 'maybes' to android phones, so they are giving their fan base a little 'taste' of whats to come.

User avatar
AppleBonker
Posts: 17313
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:40 am
Car: Useful: 2011 Nissan Titan Pro-4x
Daily: 2003 Honda Accord EX-L Coupe
Hers: 2014 Nissan Rogue SL AWD
Location: NW Indiana

Post

Highly doubt it, Gerry. Gizmodo actually had a great article about why Apple wouldn't do this. To be honest, the iPhone is still going strong. Android may be cutting into their market, but I don't think Apple is too concerned yet. They've already got a ridiculous following, and if they can get on Verizon they will continue to kill android headsets.

Also, the people who see this thing in the news are generally pretty tech savvy. Folks like you or me already know what our next phone is likely to be. This info on the next gen iphone wouldn't change my opinion. Also, the tech savvy are well aware that a new phone is coming over the summer. That's been Apple's policy all along.

User avatar
dusred
Posts: 3856
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Car: Previous Q45 owner, 09 Corolla, Ford F250 Diesel truck

Post

It's a publicity stunt by Apple. The dude left his 'top secret y0' phone at a bar and some kid found it and he happened to be a phone enthusiast and knew exactly what to do with it to get $$$. The whole thing sounds fake. Because of this it is getting major publicity and therefore will sell millions more.

User avatar
Silvia-Tom
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:01 pm

Post

"Oh yea let me sip a couple of brews in a German Beer Garden with my buddies and let me take that iPhone 4G prototype with me just in case Steve Jobs wants to video chat..."

Seriously who would do that?

User avatar
AppleBonker
Posts: 17313
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:40 am
Car: Useful: 2011 Nissan Titan Pro-4x
Daily: 2003 Honda Accord EX-L Coupe
Hers: 2014 Nissan Rogue SL AWD
Location: NW Indiana

Post

dusred wrote:It's a publicity stunt by Apple.
Again, unlikely. This is completely opposite of anything Apple has done over the past several years in the publicity department. Apple is a painfully secretive company. When it's time for the iPhone 4G to be announced, they want to do it at their own press conference and highlight the things that set this particular phone apart. Shipping the (bricked) phone out to a tech blog accomplishes nothing beneficial.

User avatar
Red coupe
Posts: 12216
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:51 pm
Car: 92 Nissan 240sx Coupe

Post

AppleBonker wrote: Shipping the (bricked) phone out to a tech blog accomplishes nothing beneficial.
You mean other then the thread on just about every forum about the new iphone with built in flash, improved camera and potential for video conferencing and a built in 64gig of storage?

User avatar
RobPaulson
Posts: 6577
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:04 am
Car: 2013 Subaru WRX

Post

haha yeah, gizmodo got like 1.5m hits or something in the first day of the posting, thats almost twice the audience of the most popular news show on TV.

i am usually the first one to thwart conspiracy theories and such like this, but this is just too perfect, honestly, android is coming out with AWESOME phones, that are way better than the 3gs. apple wanted to solidify thier fanbase by teasing them. great marketing move imo.

User avatar
AppleBonker
Posts: 17313
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:40 am
Car: Useful: 2011 Nissan Titan Pro-4x
Daily: 2003 Honda Accord EX-L Coupe
Hers: 2014 Nissan Rogue SL AWD
Location: NW Indiana

Post

Red coupe wrote:You mean other then the thread on just about every forum about the new iphone with built in flash, improved camera and potential for video conferencing and a built in 64gig of storage?
This dialogue happens for all Apple products. It did for the previous gen iPhones and the iPad. The only difference now is that we are not speculating about hardware, we know. I still fail to see how discussion of known hardware is more beneficial to Apple than discussion of rumored hardware.
RobPaulson wrote:haha yeah, gizmodo got like 1.5m hits or something in the first day of the posting
Still fail to see how this helps Apple. Giz benefited nicely, but probably more at Apple's expense.
RobPaulson wrote:android is coming out with AWESOME phones, that are way better than the 3gs. apple wanted to solidify thier fanbase by teasing them. great marketing move imo.
Apple doesn't need to help their fan base along. Have you seen those people? There is always something better around the corner. That's the nature of electronics. There will be a better phone than the 4G within months of its release (at least hardware-wise). Really, what this outing did is probably cannibalize 3GS sales. So again, more harmful than helpful.

Finally, if Apple wanted to reveal their new hardware, they would've done it at a press conference where they have control over the information released. It's Apple, people. They want to control everything. And when they have their conference, the tech world will slow down and focus solely on Apple for that time. They don't need additional publicity. They get it quite fine on their own.

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

AppleBonker wrote:Highly doubt it, Gerry. Gizmodo actually had a great article about why Apple wouldn't do this. To be honest, the iPhone is still going strong. Android may be cutting into their market, but I don't think Apple is too concerned yet. They've already got a ridiculous following, and if they can get on Verizon they will continue to kill android headsets.
Really? Do you live in an Apple bubble?
"Their market" isn't Apple's, it's Nokia's or RIMM's way before it is Apple's.

http://www.macworld.com/article/143170/ ... droid.html
http://www.precentral.net/webos-project ... share-2012
http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News ... I-studies/

Yeah, I am sure Apple isn't concerned :facepalm:
They haven't killed Android headsets, the numbers say it all. Android is gaining in popularity because of its open source OS, as long as Apple continues to push and pull their "following" with high costs and lack of functionality, Android headsets will continue to win. OS4 is a direct result of this. Now iPhone users can explore functionality that has been standard in smartphones for over 4 years. Congratulations!

AppleBonker wrote:Also, the people who see this thing in the news are generally pretty tech savvy. Folks like you or me already know what our next phone is likely to be. This info on the next gen iphone wouldn't change my opinion. Also, the tech savvy are well aware that a new phone is coming over the summer. That's been Apple's policy all along.
Again I disagree. As we speak I have two girls behind me ranting and raving about the new iPhone (this is definitely news to them). Their main talking points are; it is 4G and it has a forward facing camera. Neither of them knows a thing about 4G. I feel that those who are tech savvy tend to stay away from iPhones due to the lack in functionality.

User avatar
AppleBonker
Posts: 17313
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:40 am
Car: Useful: 2011 Nissan Titan Pro-4x
Daily: 2003 Honda Accord EX-L Coupe
Hers: 2014 Nissan Rogue SL AWD
Location: NW Indiana

Post

RCA, I was about to type a response to that, but decided not to. My comments were directed at those who think this was an intentional leak by Apple. Your post was off on a tangent that I just don't feel like going off on at this point.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Android is growing because its available on any platform. You can even get it on netbooks and MP3 players. iPhone OS requires buying an iPad or iPhone or iPod from Apple.

People probably don't care about it being open source.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Jesda wrote:People probably don't care about it being open source.
As an Android owner who reads android news and forum sites, I can't agree. Android specifically attracts much of its userbase specifically because it's an open platform. Because there are so many variations and modifications for the OS, it leaves users with a lot of choice, far beyond what the phone does out of the box. Certainly not the whole userbase is that way, but it's a big factor.
Of course, Apple's closed nature appeals to people who want a phone you have to try really hard to screw up.

People DEFINITELY care. Not all of them, but absolutely enough that it makes a difference.

But you're right about one thing: android's growing rapidly because everyone's releasing tons of devices that use it right now. Apple is the only place to get an Apple-powered device.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Nah, only techies like you and me care about it being open, and maybe developers. The openness that attracts a wide variety of developers attracts a wide variety of customers, but customers don't care about why there's so many applications, only that they exist.

Average joe/jane goes into a BB, RatShack, or Sprint/VZW/TMO store, they see that its basically a pocket computer with "cool apps", a nice browser, lots of software, and a network that's not AT&T (especially if theyre an existing VZW/Sprint/TMO customer). Its for people who want the iPhone's multimedia goodies without being forced to buy an iPhone or switch carriers.

While people do ask for choice, they tend to prefer the default configuration with a few programs and changes, nothing significant from the way it comes out of the box. This is why Apple's approach attracts so many people.



And then there's those weird Blackberry people who typically do one thing, messaging, and want to do that one task well above all else. I swear, RIM could release the BB OS on a piece of hardware that looked like moldy cake and I'd probably still buy it (as long as the awesome keyboard was there). E-mail isn't quite as simple and direct on Android, WebOS, or iPhone.

I can pull up tracking data and pump out replies to customers in no time on my little Blackberry better than I can on any full-featured multimedia smartphone platform. I guess that's the only thing keeping RIM afloat -- business customers.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Jesda wrote:Nah, only techies like you and me care about it being open
That's exactly what I'm getting at: a LOT of android owners are techies. BECAUSE they're attracted to it by the open source nature. And a lot of owners who didn't care before start to care after they purchase the device...there are so many user-friendly videos and articles for rooting/hacking/customizing android, it's hard to own one and NOT become an android geek. People who wouldn't have considered rooting another phone find it so easy to do with Android that pretty soon they're seeking out their favorite mods and home screen replacements and ports, etc. Android converts a lot of people to the geek side by its nature.

User avatar
AZ89two4Tsx
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:02 am

Post

I think this is a publicity stunt by Apple.

And I don't think Apple is too concerned about the Android OS, YET. They probably see it as Windows in terms of computers.

Apple still has the simple, user-friendly, and cosmetic advantage on its side. And that's why it appeals to most people. Because most people that buy an Iphone AREN'T techies. They just want a phone that does cool stuff. A few extra bucks for apps isn't a big deal.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote: That's exactly what I'm getting at: a LOT of android owners are techies. BECAUSE they're attracted to it by the open source nature. And a lot of owners who didn't care before start to care after they purchase the device...there are so many user-friendly videos and articles for rooting/hacking/customizing android, it's hard to own one and NOT become an android geek. People who wouldn't have considered rooting another phone find it so easy to do with Android that pretty soon they're seeking out their favorite mods and home screen replacements and ports, etc. Android converts a lot of people to the geek side by its nature.
Sure, and you could hack the hell out of the iRiver too (I put RockBox on mine), but people still bought iPods for the verticality (I think I just made up a word) -- Apple's beginning-to-end support of the device from retail sale to content distribution. Most consumers want to buy a new car and take it to the car dealer where they bought it for service. Apple goes a step further and sells the gas, too. The Android's growing popularity is from a Microsoft-style approach: wide software distribution on compatible hardware produced by several hardware manufacturers. 1993 all over again. Lots of IBM-PC geeks introduced themselves to the service industry and became IT guys, but customers were only concerned with the availability and interoperability of software.

Of the four large PDA/smartphone operating systems (Apple Newton, classic Palm OS, Windows CE/Mobile, and Blackberry), only Windows and BB survived into the current era. Microsoft's new Windows Phone operating system is changing dramatically, following Apple's approach, closing the borders, restricting software selection, and focusing the product on a handful of frequently used consumer features, conceding its tiny share of the enterprise market to RIM. Interestingly, just before Apple ceased development and finally killed it, the Newton OS had the largest selection of PDA software on the market, in part because it was an open marketplace (lots of freeware, shareware, and commercial software for doctors) with good developer support.

User avatar
AppleBonker
Posts: 17313
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:40 am
Car: Useful: 2011 Nissan Titan Pro-4x
Daily: 2003 Honda Accord EX-L Coupe
Hers: 2014 Nissan Rogue SL AWD
Location: NW Indiana

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:That's exactly what I'm getting at: a LOT of android owners are techies. BECAUSE they're attracted to it by the open source nature.
This I would agree with. I can't wait til my current contract is up so I can explore other options. I had a windows mobile phone before switching to the iPhone. Now I would really like to be running android. I also really want to jump ship from AT&T to Verizon.

My dad is somewhat of a gadget geek (though definitely not as insane as I am), and he was intrigued by my iPhone when I bought it. Since he is forced to use Verizon, he ended up switching to the Droid. He's not the type of person to root it, so I know the amount of playing around he's done has been limited. But I think overall he loves the phone. MoD, you make android phones sound oh so tempting at this point.
AZ89two4Tsx wrote:I think this is a publicity stunt by Apple.
Once again, I want to see some logic as to how this helped Apple financially. If you follow the money, this theory breaks down. And quickly.

User avatar
RobPaulson
Posts: 6577
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:04 am
Car: 2013 Subaru WRX

Post

AppleBonker wrote: Still fail to see how this helps Apple. Giz benefited nicely, but probably more at Apple's expense.
Really? The simple exposure to the market is epic. So many people ahve now simply been interested by the article, they will think twice about getting an android/bb in the next 3 months. The doubt it instills is what apple is working with. I dont think you are really grasping the full picture of how a marketing scheme like this (because its def been done before, maybe nto by apple) works.
Apple doesn't need to help their fan base along. Have you seen those people? There is always something better around the corner. That's the nature of electronics. There will be a better phone than the 4G within months of its release (at least hardware-wise). Really, what this outing did is probably cannibalize 3GS sales. So again, more harmful than helpful.
adam... i've always been on ur side on ur apple posts/ideas ... but this one really makes u seem like you swallowed a whole pitcher of the koolaid meng...

You may be severely underestimating the absolute ignorance, stupidity, and gullibility of the people who have yet to make up their mind about who they want to have as a device provider. Ever heard "any press is good press"? thats what the majority of the american public falls for. that majority rules the market. people are, in general, NOT as decisive as you or I when it comes to these devices. You have any idea how many non-techie people have heard of this leak and feel 'special' and 'in the know' now? that makes them feel like they have inside information and are a 'part' of something. Also, since they bricked the phone, ALOT of people are going to be waiting to see the OS, sure, everyone 'knew' apple was coming out with it, but now its been CONFIRMED!!! ZOMG ITS REAL!!! YAY!!! (see what i did there? its a level of excitement apple is creating towards their product...)

you have to consider the psychology behind what they are doing... I am not saying 100% they staged it, no one can say that. But i'm going to go with 70% confidently on this one. It is definitely a possibility.

(wow i sound like a crazy conspiracy theorist LULZ!)

User avatar
AZ89two4Tsx
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:02 am

Post

^ Give this man a cookie. He understands!

But yeah, totally right. "Any press is good press."

User avatar
RobPaulson
Posts: 6577
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:04 am
Car: 2013 Subaru WRX

Post

Image

NOM NOM NOM NOM

User avatar
AppleBonker
Posts: 17313
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:40 am
Car: Useful: 2011 Nissan Titan Pro-4x
Daily: 2003 Honda Accord EX-L Coupe
Hers: 2014 Nissan Rogue SL AWD
Location: NW Indiana

Post

RobPaulson wrote:Really? The simple exposure to the market is epic. So many people ahve now simply been interested by the article, they will think twice about getting an android/bb in the next 3 months. The doubt it instills is what apple is working with. I dont think you are really grasping the full picture of how a marketing scheme like this (because its def been done before, maybe nto by apple) works.
My point is, this is not Apple's style. Steve requires control. This is a completely uncontrolled distribution of information. Apple doesn't release much technical information. In fact, a lot of what we find out comes from after the devices go on sale (not before) and someone opens them up. I don't think they would've interested less people if they scheduled a press release like always. My problem with the theory is that it is such a huge departure from the core method of business operations that Apple has used over the past. I don't think Steve just turned the company on its head. Also, I think they get far more publicity out of the speculation. Remember what happened with the iPad before it was released. Holy smokes, the internet was a buzz and tech writers dreamed up all sorts of ideas about what the product would be like. Blogs wasted time digging through patents to speculate on what the new devices will have. None of this happens here. It's a one-shot deal, and the conversation will die down in a few days/weeks. Then, no one will really care at all until the phone goes up for sale. Very anti-climactic and very much against Apple's proven system.
RobPaulson wrote:adam... i've always been on ur side on ur apple posts/ideas ... but this one really makes u seem like you swallowed a whole pitcher of the koolaid meng...
I never claimed to be a fan of any particular brand. I buy what suits my needs at any given time, regardless of the name on the device. But you seriously think Apple needs help with their marketing? Once again, look at the fanbois. They are rabid for Apple. I didn't see anyone camping outside Verizon stores when the Droid was released. Yet, Apple brings out a new phone and people will be camping. Lots. Hell, they released a device (the iPad) that has VERY limited market appeal and people STILL camped out. Regardless of whether or not I had any of their kool-aid, it's pretty apparent that tons of other folks have. There isn't too much Apple can improve on in terms of marketing (see, why would they change their strategy when it is currently working so well?).
RobPaulson wrote:Ever heard "any press is good press"?
Sure, but if they wanted the press, they would've held a conference. Have you read tech sites around Apple launches/press conferences. There's like four-billion Apple articles and two that aren't. In fact, most of the commenters get pissed about all the Apple love. Now, Giz got a ton of traffic and all the other sites were left with "hey, look what Giz found". I don't think a controlled press conference would've netted any less publicity.

People like rumors and speculation. We have none of that about the device anymore. Look at this thread, for example. We're speculating as to the origin of the phone and if it was planted or truly lost. This conversation could continue for weeks. But, we sure as hell wont be talking about the hardware, cause it's already old news. Now, if the phone hadn't been dissected, we could spend the next few weeks/months arguing about whether there would be a front-facing camera. Or if the screen would be capacitive LCD, or maybe OLED. THAT generates more word of mouth. I can't wait to see what the new screen is versus the lack of excitement I now have since I already know (way too many months ahead of time). The discussion going on here does nothing to help iPhone sales. Debating what may or may not be on the device gets more people talking about the device (helpful) rather than talking about the company (does nothing).

Alfador
Posts: 3043
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 4:55 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 240SX Hatch
Location: The People's Republic of Taxachusetts
Contact:

Post

This whole thing is epicly sad. No one should really care about this. Nothing of value was learned, apple got their product back, and for christ's sake if the 4th or whatever iteration of a phone that has just about reached market saturation.

Apple doesn't need help marketing their crap. The zealots who buy on brand do it for them. This is a good publicity boost for them, but an unneeded one.

What would have been notable would be if the new iPhone displayed some hint of Steve Jobs getting over his phobia of buttons. Single button mice for 20 years and nothing but touchscreen only phones now? Bleh

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

AppleBonker wrote:RCA, I was about to type a response to that, but decided not to. My comments were directed at those who think this was an intentional leak by Apple. Your post was off on a tangent that I just don't feel like going off on at this point.
Eh, you can always PM me :gotme

Ar878
Posts: 2929
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:28 pm

Post

buuuuump.

http://gizmodo.com/5524843/police-seize ... s-computer

looks like apple pulled some strings.

User avatar
AppleBonker
Posts: 17313
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:40 am
Car: Useful: 2011 Nissan Titan Pro-4x
Daily: 2003 Honda Accord EX-L Coupe
Hers: 2014 Nissan Rogue SL AWD
Location: NW Indiana

Post

People still think this is a publicity stunt?


Return to “General Chat”