Yes, it's called Windows 7 Starter.zacmil wrote:
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that Windows has a lighter version of Windows 7 designed with devices such as netbooks in mind.
Yes, it's called Windows 7 Starter.zacmil wrote:
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that Windows has a lighter version of Windows 7 designed with devices such as netbooks in mind.
excellent.Razi wrote:HEY I'M EATING HERE!
Let me introduce you guys to WePad created by the Germans using Android.AppleBonker wrote:MoD, you seem to have more knowledge on a lot of this than I do, so I'll direct this question towards you. I am honestly considering buying an iPad (hear me out first). I have a desktop running Ubuntu (and windows dual boot), a netbook on Ubuntu, a laptop on Ubuntu and a HTPC running mythbuntu. I am comfortable enough in running Ubuntu (haven't branched out to other distros yet) and windows, and I wouldn't consider myself an apple fanboy. I'm considering the iPad to use it for checking email/light web browsing from the couch. I currently do this on my iphone (but the screen is a bit small) so I'm not concerned about the lack of flash. The netbook can do this, but it is a bit cumbersome and the battery drains in about 8 hours without hibernating (the iPad should last longer with minimal use).
Also, I would like to use it as an ebook reader. I do like the idea of having a number of books on one small, lightweight device. Plus, with the color screen it should be able to run magazine subscriptions which could make my life easier. Again, the netbook isn't ideal here because I don't know how to hold a netbook for an extended period of time to read a book off of it. I don't get why some people claim the screen is too harsh when compared to e-ink as I've sat in front of a computer for 14 hours straight before without problems.
Now having said all that, can you think of any other tablet-like devices that have a similar form-factor but will run a real OS (I would prefer some flavor of linux)? I'd rather not be crippled by the iphone OS, but there doesn't seem to be another option out there that fits these needs. And, I do realize that I am in the painfully small majority with my wants (I wouldn't consider an iPad without first having the desktop, laptop and netbook).
Android fanboi look into enTourage eDGe.S13FX wrote:
Let me introduce you guys to WePad created by the Germans using Android.
Its pretty sick if you ask me, and Im definitly going to snatch one up. Probably cause Im also an android Fan Boi :p and own like three phones with it hehe,
http://phandroid.com/2010/03/2...attle/
So it's software LIKE Office or it's actually Office-compatible? I can seamlessly open/edit/save Excel2007 docs on the iPad? If so, that'd be compelling.initial_jc wrote:Ipad will be able to use the iwork suite which includes pages( Word) numbers(excel) Keynote( power point).
What about .docx?initial_jc wrote:the iwork apps are compatible with office document files, just the major one .doc, .xls, .ppt, and .pdf
there is going to be a vga adapter
and the apple bluetooth keyboard will work with the ipad
Yeah, no duh. All you need to do is go to Netflix's website...initial_jc wrote:There is going to be NetFlix Streaming awesome.
Because it has to do with history. The PC was the IBM PC/PCAT/PCXT which became the "IBM PC compatible" standard which then was shortened on software boxes to "PC compatible" then just "PC".PoorManQ45 wrote:I am always confused when Apple makes attacks at "PCs".
A "PC" Is a personal computer. It is not a computer that runs windows.
Windows systems are PCs. Apples are PCs.
They try so hard to differentiate themselves. it's amusing.
Indeed. nice shortened history lesson.Jesda wrote:
Because it has to do with history. The PC was the IBM PC/PCAT/PCXT which became the "IBM PC compatible" standard which then was shortened on software boxes to "PC compatible" then just "PC".
IBM's DOS was also called PC-DOS.
The literal definition is "personal computer", but PC as we know it stands for a personal computer with a particular lineage and platform. The Macintosh was different enough in 1985 to allow it to diverge as a separate kind of personal computer in its own competing category.PoorManQ45 wrote:
Indeed. nice shortened history lesson.
Only problem is that the meaning has changed to "personal computer" now
I understand what you're saying.Jesda wrote:
The literal definition is "personal computer", but PC as we know it stands for a personal computer with a particular lineage and platform. The Macintosh was different enough in 1985 to allow it to diverge as a separate kind of personal computer in its own competing category.
The Amiga name was also referred to as a separate category of computing device when describing "PC vs Amiga" because it was dramatically different.
Well, of course. Selling a comparative advantage moves hardware.PoorManQ45 wrote:It just seems that these days Apple is trying to hard to make themselves seem different.
MinisterofDOOM wrote: It really is nothing more than an ipod touch with a giant screen.
The iPad is NOT a tablet computer. It's a smartphone.
MinisterofDOOM wrote:The iPad is NOT a tablet computer. It's a smartphone.