SR20DET240 wrote:IL Emissions Laws
I just hit up google and came up with this. Some good brain food!
:ylsuper
What sucks is that cars from 1981-1995 get the IM240 test. Basically they put your car on a mock up dyno and run it under everyday driving conditions with a sniffer up its pipe.Hopefully the SR20s will pass. Those fortunate enough to have fuel management control can lean their mixture out to a safe limit and probably pass w/o a problem. Good luck for those w/o a cat! Anybody done the IM240 with an SR20?
slw240sx wrote:my Ca has a O2 sensor , they gutted all the emmisions stuff from under the hood i still think itll pass though i mean cars that are from 1980 that use carbs still pass, as long as it dont smoke an runs near lean conditions should do alright, ill post one day when i E check it... Ohios emissions contorllers E check are 375,000behind on property taxes isnt that screwed up. biggest tax evaders in the area i live in an its a governtment progam
CrabSpirits wrote:Tommy this is Brian. I was thinking about your situation for awhile and came up with a brainstorm:Do the swap but also add the ECU and perhaps the harness/sensors for the KA. Just hook the KA ecu to the diagnostic terminal and run power/ground to it. Do this with some quick connectors so you can remove and install the KA stuff whenever emissions time comes. When the guy at emissions links to the car, he will be checking codes for an ECU that isn't even running the engine! As long as they don't check for realtime data with car running and just checking for trouble codes you should be fine. Anyone else have a problem with my theory?
EZcheese15 wrote:Yeah, I do...
In order for that to work, not only will you have to have all the sensors for the KA (anything that will trip a code), but they all have to be functioning correctly. In other words, you have to have the KA crank position sensor picking up a real crank position signal, otherwise it will cause a code. Any of the sensors will. And they don't just need *a* signal, but they need a real one. Or atleast simulated to be real. Like an O2 sensor signal of 1.5V ain't gonna cut it. And there is a LOT of sensors that you have to account for.
CrabSpirits wrote:As I said before, you should be fine as long as they don't test it when the car is running and see that there is no data from the CAS, etc. as far as signals when the engine is running. Even if they do, the kind of people who work at these places are probly too brain dead to notice that rpms are at 0, etc. And there is no way these people will tell what engine is in there by looking at it. With the ECU, Sensors and Harness shoved in the glove box, the data should look like it normally does with the key in the "on" position.
CrabSpirits wrote:If all the sensors are plugged into the harness with the key "on" they can't tell the difference between the inside of a glovebox and the engine. A CAS or an O2 sensor that is just sitting there plugged into the harness will not trigger a fault code.