Any reason not to go back to blow through maf setup?

Discuss the RB20, RB25 and RB26 series engines.
240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Kicking around the idea of going back to a blow through maf setup. There just isn't enough room to plumb a maf in properly with the 6boost manifold and HX35 in my engine bay. It would be 100x easier to go to blow through. If I do blow through, Ill be doing an exhaust setup for my catch can.

Now, I have been draw through for a few years, and honestly don't remember why I changed back. Is there any reason I shouldn't do blow through setup?

Also, does the maf have to be on the cold or hot side of the I/C to work correctly?

Thanks.

Evan


robbie2883
Posts: 605
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:36 am
Car: 1998 RB25 Kouki

Post

for the car to run correctly on a blow through setup you need to have the maf after the IC (if it reads IAT's) and also needs to be after the BOV

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Okay, that is just like I had it years back.

Evan

User avatar
Carl H
Posts: 5985
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 4:09 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX SE RB30DET

Post

only reason i can think not to is that occassionally i'll have to pull the maf off and reseal the cover as it tends to pop off with higher boost pressures.other than that my car has been in the blowthru configuration for years now.

robbie2883
Posts: 605
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:36 am
Car: 1998 RB25 Kouki

Post

just out of curiosity, other then room for fitment, is there any real reason to go to a blow through setup? i mean i understand that the closer to the TB the less area for leaks to pop up and mess with afr's.....but i mean other then that. why?

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

One big deal for me is the ability to drive to safety with a coupler blown off.

I would stay draw through if everything fit in the allocated space better honestly.

Evan


Darius
Posts: 4820
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 9:48 am
Car: RB25DET S14 - 665 WHP (SOLD)
Location: Chicagoland

Post

Best reason is that the blow thru MAF eliminates the need for BOV recirculation.

robbie2883
Posts: 605
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:36 am
Car: 1998 RB25 Kouki

Post

that's, true...forgot about that! but i like the quicker spool after a shift! LOL

Darius
Posts: 4820
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 9:48 am
Car: RB25DET S14 - 665 WHP (SOLD)
Location: Chicagoland

Post

Ok I'll be honest:

BOV sound>>>>not bogging

Cjmartz2k
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:39 pm
Car: Hunting for a '89 GTR now
Location: Okinawa, Japan

Post

Ricer


Darius
Posts: 4820
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 9:48 am
Car: RB25DET S14 - 665 WHP (SOLD)
Location: Chicagoland

Post

I'll admit that I sometimes wish I had a loud, unrecirculated BOV so I could blow it off and scare little kids off their bikes.

l0nestar
Posts: 2251
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:24 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 250SX
2004 Toyota Altezza
1963 Chevy Impala SS
Contact:

Post

Darius wrote:I'll admit that I sometimes wish I had a loud, unrecirculated BOV so I could blow it off and scare little kids off their bikes.
Isn't that what the 'screamer' pipes are for??

Cjmartz2k
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:39 pm
Car: Hunting for a '89 GTR now
Location: Okinawa, Japan

Post

l0nestar wrote:
Isn't that what the 'screamer' pipes are for??
Ricer



Screamer pipe are for boys with stock turbos that wish they had something big and wastegated

robbie2883
Posts: 605
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:36 am
Car: 1998 RB25 Kouki

Post

HAHA!!! i have always LOVED my hks's....but after driving this for a little bit with a recirc'd greddy rs i've grown to LOVE how quiet this car is....nobody knows jack....unless i open the exhaust cutout...then she screams!!! LOL

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

My car sounds nothing like stock, the forge BOV that I have is VERY freaking quiet. I doubt anybody would even notice it vented to atmosphere.

Thanks guys.

Yellow4g63
Posts: 3718
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 6:07 pm
Car: 95 Nissan RB20 240SX RB20
91 Nissan NX2000 VE power
95 Nissan 240SX Stock
Contact:

Post

If u go to Blow through with the lightning or the newer slow mafs the install will be easy and clean since they have those flanges you weld onto your intercooler piping.

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

Cjmartz2k wrote:
Ricer



Screamer pipe are for boys with stock turbos that wish they had something big and wastegated
Ah, but when you vent through the hood and throw 3 foot fireballs on a decel load-up, it's pretty friggin cool. It scares the s*** out of the bosozoku too which is a public service.

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Yellow4g63 wrote:If u go to Blow through with the lightning or the newer slow mafs the install will be easy and clean since they have those flanges you weld onto your intercooler piping.
I was hoping you would pipe up.

How did you scale the MAF since you went to the lightning setup? I know the setups would all have a bit different scaling but someplace to start?

evan

Cjmartz2k
Posts: 1845
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 1:39 pm
Car: Hunting for a '89 GTR now
Location: Okinawa, Japan

Post

themadscientist wrote:
Ah, but when you vent through the hood and throw 3 foot fireballs on a decel load-up, it's pretty friggin cool. It scares the s*** out of the bosozoku too which is a public service.
Ahh yes!! New Years fun! It would be more of a service to just take a deuce and a half out on town and drive over the little bastards though

240z4u--I've heard some people say that blow thru isn't as adaptable as draw thru to changing weather conditions and new mods to the engine. Something about the i/c messing with how much the air cools down the hot wire and it not changing as much as ambient does outside. I don't know how much truth there is to that though. Just mentioning it.

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Anyone know what the lightning element in 2.75" pipe would be good for HP wise?

Evan

User avatar
Carl H
Posts: 5985
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 4:09 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX SE RB30DET

Post

also for those with big nasty cams it helps stablize the cam idle...my car idles like glass with just a hint of cam note.

wrgibson
Posts: 252
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:06 am
Car: RB Hatch

Post

I'm sure this has been covered somewhere but, is there any tuning needed when goiing to a blow through setup? I wouldn't think so considering the MAF is still just metering air from a different location, but I'm not sure.

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Yes you have to retune for it, there are a lot of variables such as turbulence and air temp that can throw everything out of whack.

robbie2883
Posts: 605
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:36 am
Car: 1998 RB25 Kouki

Post

wrgibson wrote:I'm sure this has been covered somewhere but, is there any tuning needed when goiing to a blow through setup? I wouldn't think so considering the MAF is still just metering air from a different location, but I'm not sure.
air density, temp, ect all change on the cold side of the IC so the maf will be reading a little different, not to mention different turbulence characteristics and so forth. so basically...yes...it'll need to be tuned

User avatar
Cameron
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Car: a 240

Post

ok i didnt want to make a new thread for my question seeing as it kinda pertains to the topic of this thread...

Anyways, I am getting ready to do my intercooler piping on my RB. first off i have a greddy intake, Q45 TB and a Q45 Maf.

My question is, should i run the 3.5in IC piping off the Q45 TB down to the maf, and then 3.5in from the MAF to the Intercooler reducing down to a 3in coupler to attach to the intercooler? the reason i am thinking that is cause i dont want to run 2.5 inch (standard size IC piping) then have to expand up to 3.5 inch for my q45 maf, because wouldnt that cause turbulence? wouldnt it be better to run the same size pipe as the q45 maf and the Throttle body? or does it matter?

also another question, for anyone using a q45 maf, what did you do for a maf adapter to bolt up to the intercooler piping? i know one side of the maf can be handled with a coupler, but the other side has the 4 bolt holes.. what should i do for an adapter?

thanks.

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Cameron, feel free to start your own thread. There are gonna be lots of opinions on this one.

FYI, the Q45 sensor doesn't meter as much air as the z32. I wouldn't use it.

Yellow4g63
Posts: 3718
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 6:07 pm
Car: 95 Nissan RB20 240SX RB20
91 Nissan NX2000 VE power
95 Nissan 240SX Stock
Contact:

Post

240z4u wrote:
I was hoping you would pipe up.

How did you scale the MAF since you went to the lightning setup? I know the setups would all have a bit different scaling but someplace to start?

evan
LoL I just used a VQ table someone made for the lightning maf. The conversion numbers that were given in this thread is a good starting point tho it has the voltages n stuff. I had someone make a new VQ table with the info but haven't tried yet. As for HP with the 2.75 pipe I'm not sure, when I looked into it most of the mustang guys were running 3" IC piping. I'm running 2.75 on mine tho.

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Yellow, I take it your not using a PFC huh?

Yellow4g63
Posts: 3718
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 6:07 pm
Car: 95 Nissan RB20 240SX RB20
91 Nissan NX2000 VE power
95 Nissan 240SX Stock
Contact:

Post

Not anymore stock ecu with a Nistune board.

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Yellow4g63 wrote:Not anymore stock ecu with a Nistune board.
Yeah, you can just use the VE tables then. I see.

Thanks!

Do you know what kind of power it is good for in a 3" pipe?


Return to “RB20DET / RB25DET / RB26DETT Forum”