This. And, if the company seems to want you gone that bad, is that really a place you want to be employed? It definitely sucks, but I'd start looking hard for a new gig. My last company started treating the employees like crap (at least in my eyes), so I made up my mind to move on and started searching hardcore for a new job. Good luck.Jesda wrote:If an employer wants you out, they'll find a way soon enough.
...I automatically stop the person and remind them that none of that an be substantiated without documentation, evidence or signed statements. It's kinda like crying "wolf".pepegurr wrote:the guys i work with on my crew seem to be on a headhunt,
they have been looking for a way to fire me
talking trash and downing me
they are trying to get me
Ummm, it sounds like they let you get away with violating the rules for 15 months and now they're tightening the noose. Get in compliance.pepegurr wrote:I mean they waited 15 months after the deadline to start enforcing this on me, can they even do that?
And unfortunately in this country, most employees feel like they're entitled to a job, and should be allowed to do whatever they want without fear of consequence.Frank E Bones wrote:Unfortunately in this country most employers can do whatever the f*ck they want to their employees without fear of repercussions.
YES.AZhitman wrote:
And unfortunately in this country, most employees feel like they're entitled to a job, and should be allowed to do whatever they want without fear of consequence.
Absolutely true My wife has a co-worker who is exactly like that.AZhitman wrote:
And unfortunately in this country, most employees feel like they're entitled to a job, and should be allowed to do whatever they want without fear of consequence.
Yep. A lot of them do think this.AZhitman wrote:And unfortunately in this country, most employees feel like they're entitled to a job
I don't agree with this. Many are asked to do things above and beyond the call of their duties and are fired when not compliant with that philosophy. Do you think that everyone should be the employee of the month? Isn't it allowed to be somebody who just does what they are supposed to do and nothing more? It's not like companies don't abuse their power all the time or anything... I have seen it several times.AZhitman wrote:and should be allowed to do whatever they want without fear of consequence.
Its the american way- wrote:sTm[-HeavyHips]Get fired and collect unemployment.
Quite a few of my co-workers take their jobs for granted and take advantage of the owner's generosity. It's irritating to watch.AZhitman wrote:
And unfortunately in this country, most employees feel like they're entitled to a job, and should be allowed to do whatever they want without fear of consequence.
You should take pride in what you do, and do your best to do it well. If you dont feel up to it, then you're in the wrong line of work.Dattebayo wrote:
I don't agree with this. Many are asked to do things above and beyond the call of their duties and are fired when not compliant with that philosophy. Do you think that everyone should be the employee of the month? Isn't it allowed to be somebody who just does what they are supposed to do and nothing more? It's not like companies don't abuse their power all the time or anything... I have seen it several times.
See, to me, a person in a job really shouldn't have to battle his/her way through a job just to keep their employment, and this economy seems to be making so we have to now...Putting the burden on the employee seems crazy to me, but that may be the reason I'm not a Republican.
The truth in its purest form...FlatBlackIan wrote:
You should take pride in what you do, and do your best to do it well. If you dont feel up to it, then you're in the wrong line of work.
People who just want to cruse along doing the bare minimum are often the dregs of society. Not always, but often, these are also the people who cause accidents, and cost the companies they work for money. They see a broken saftey valve 5 minutes before they're off, and they ignore it because staying late is not worth it to them. They notice a poorly designed gas pedal, and they pass it off to the next shift, because they just dont care.
You dont go above and beyond because the company asks you to, you do it because its YOUR job. Its your name at the bottom of the work order, or on the business card. When someone sees what you've done, you want them to know you gave it your all.
Michael Schumacher didnt win more F1 races by doing the least amount of work possible.
Sebastian Loeb didnt take the most WRC titles by doing the bare minimum.
And Volkswagen didnt build the fastest car of all time by playing it safe.
Too many people these days have gotten lazy, they expect to be spoon fed their entire lives. They seem to forget that not so many years ago, 99% of this country had to work thier butt off, not for a few more dollars on the paycheck, but to keep food on the table, or keep the roof over head.
Our ancestors worked themselves to the bone, not so we could slack off, but to give us the chance to make better.
//end rant
Ummmm, I oppose a LOT of people's unemployment claims.Dattebayo wrote:He won't be able to, they will fight it just to be d!ck.
Dattebayo wrote: Many are asked to do things above and beyond the call of their duties and are fired when not compliant with that philosophy.
Not if I'm a stakeholder or shareholder in that company.Dattebayo wrote:Isn't it allowed to be somebody who just does what they are supposed to do and nothing more?
How does that have anything to do with a political party? Hard work and integrity are GOP-only tenets? Niiiice.Dattebayo wrote:Putting the burden on the employee seems crazy to me, but that may be the reason I'm not a Republican.
Yeah, sure. You're not saving or helping anyone really.AZhitman wrote:Ummmm, I oppose a LOT of people's unemployment claims.
This "d!ck" saves you and other people a lot of money by keeping bums and slackers off the dole.
That has nothing to do with what this was about as far as I know.AZhitman wrote:I do a fraud investigation on someone for stealing from the agency... they're allowed to resign in lieu of termination proceedings (because it's cheaper and simpler), and they go file for unemployment.
HELL YES I'm gonna get in touch with that person's reviewer and let them know WHY the person is no longer employed.
Dude, seriously, cut it out. Don't talk to me like that.AZhitman wrote:Don't be a PMQ. Speak only that of which you know.
It's a cop out and you know it. Fricken one-way goddamn street.AZhitman wrote:"...and other duties as specified."
It's in damn near every position description I've ever read.
What does that have to do with it? Some places cut you in on shares just for working with the company, so what? It means you're obligated to do extra duties? Riiight.AZhitman wrote:Not if I'm a stakeholder or shareholder in that company.
You sound like you're a member of the "no" club. This is really all I meant with that.AZhitman wrote: How does that have anything to do with a political party? Hard work and integrity are GOP-only tenets?
And that is one of the things wrong with this country today. Too many people are willing to slide through life. Whats the point? Its called drive, and its what separates the men from the boys (or girls, hi Bex! ).Dattebayo wrote:
Most people are working for the paycheck,
There is a huge difference between "can't" do, and wont do. If you honestly cannot do something, then 99.9% of employers will understand. Im not saying there isn't bad apples but most know the difference between can't and won't.Dattebayo wrote: if mr. big shot boss wants to tell me to take on another job with different skill-sets I didn't get hired for and I get fired because I can't do what he told me to do well, then fighting me for unemployment is just to be a d!ck. AT least man up, mr. employer, rather than hide behind some stupid front like that.
That's the thing, you're indicating that you would at least attempt to fill the requirement. You're correct, they can't hold you accountable for being able to do things beyond your job description, but when they do assign you something under the blanket clause of "and other duties as assigned," attempting to find a way to do what they ask of you is "showing pride in your work," at least enough so to "get a paycheck."Dattebayo wrote:Sure, I can feel that way about what I do, but if mr. big shot boss wants to tell me to take on another job with different skill-sets I didn't get hired for and I get fired because I can't do what he told me to do well, then fighting me for unemployment is just to be a d!ck. AT least man up, mr. employer, rather than hide behind some stupid front like that.
Dattebayo wrote: I'm officially pissed now, I really don't care to talk about this anymore because I can see all too well how you feel about this. I'm done.
That "crap" is why some of us succeed despite unfairness, a work environment that favors the employer, a bad economy, and other hindrances and handicaps.Dattebayo wrote:...over-righteous ideal about "going big or going home" or "if you're going to do something, do it right"... Cut the crap already.
What we didn't learn from Office Space is that the moment Jennifer Aniston gave her boss the finger and stormed out, someone was more than happy to replace her while wearing twice the amount of flair. Plus, she f*cked Lumberg.Dattebayo wrote:Most people are working for the paycheck, not for some over-righteous ideal about "going big or going home" or "if you're going to do something, do it right"... Cut the crap already. Sure, I can feel that way about what I do, but if mr. big shot boss wants to tell me to take on another job with different skill-sets I didn't get hired for and I get fired because I can't do what he told me to do well, then fighting me for unemployment is just to be a d!ck. AT least man up, mr. employer, rather than hide behind some stupid front like that.
I get SO sick of hearing "That's not my job" from some of my cowokers. Most of the time it really IS their job. And I do tons of s*** that's "not my job." It doesn't put me out, and often actually makes things easier for me. I work with people who are always happy to save some effort on a technicality as far as responsibilities. Even if the thing they're trying not to do is simple and quick...they'll do anything to avoid doing actual work. It makes things worse for the rest of us who work with them. I have no tolerance for it. If you're not here to work, GTFO. I work with people who are SO AMAZINGLY useless that I'd rather just do a double workload on my own than have their "help." Those kinds of people do not "deserve" a job. And if they get fired they'll argue until the ends of the earth that they've been wronged.Dattebayo wrote:Many are asked to do things above and beyond the call of their duties and are fired when not compliant with that philosophy.