Quite aware of this. However, the reality of AWIC's is that once a system is set up correctly for daily driven situations, where reliability is a MUST, its simply another system that can fail. There is all KINDS of cool things you can do with intercooling in general, but for the most part they arnt practical on the street. Especially when a FMIC works great, its like, why over complicate something, what are you really gaining?C-Kwik wrote:
There isn't really any reason a Liquid to Air intercooler can't be used effectively on the street.
Well, thats not entirely true. Street use can consist of things such as road trips, long trips up the highway, ect. I dont EVER feel the need to have to baby my car. I want to be able to beat the ish out of it all day long if i chose. So, i guess your thinking of street driving in the sense of your typical driver where as i am not such a driver. I doubt im alone in this..C-Kwik wrote: In fact, street use should be one of the lower stress applications for ANY intercooler application as people will tend to spend much less time under boost than one might at a race track.
Where as a car at a track gets the ever loving crap beaten out of it for a few min, then usually has time to rest, recoup, refill, and rip up some more rubber later. If it breaks? Hey, we got a trailer and come-along, whos feeling spunky lmao.
Now, i have no first hand information or experience on this so excuse me because this could be construed as talking out of my a**. A real drag setup has the absolute minimum capacity reservoir it needs to keep the temperatures stable for one run.C-Kwik wrote:
Even drag races can tend to have a negligible effect on a liquid to air IC depending on how much water is in the system. Water has a high specific heat and makes for a great heat exchange medium. With enough water in the system, the relatively short duration of a drag race could rely on the heat sink properties of mass much like large air-to-air intercoolers already to. Only, in the case of liquid to air, there will likely be greater heat sink capacity due to the amount of water in such a system.
In addition discharge temps from a turbo nearing the edges of their efficiency windows, which every real drag car will do, creates discharge temperatures in the neighborhood of 150C. When put against say... 2C water, that water absorbs a LOT of heat really damned fast.
Many maybe, but not most. They are usually similarly sized as far as the.. rectangle however.C-Kwik wrote:
The thickness of the condensor is only one dimension that needs to be considered. Many condensors are as large as the radiators for the vehicle they are mounted on.
Thats why we have fans on coolant radiators, and thin condensers placed up in front of the path of air.C-Kwik wrote:And if we were to compare it to a thicker exchanger of the same volume, the thinner exchanger with a larger frontal area would be more efficient at exchanging heat as much more of the exchange surface will be exposed to ambient temperatures. Thicker cores see exchanges with higher temperature air as the air moves through the core making it less effective.
That is true, but i just didnt really even want to get into it because idk.. i cant see the need for a 'radiator' of this nature at all on a drag AWIC setup. To each their own.C-Kwik wrote:
The ambient exchanger needs to be able to handle that flow rate (I believe condensor lines tend to be narrower than typical liquid to air water lines).
Well, you dont build something without specific intent, so ignoring your intent makes no sense.C-Kwik wrote:In the end, the ability of such a system will depend on the individual components used rather than what its intent was for.
But the statement you made is fine.. Just spurred that thought.
Modified by 480sx at 3:45 PM 8/17/2009
