I didn't mean smoking WHILE driving.DriftingJesus wrote:Meh
One could argue that drive while smoking anything is dangerous, because of the diminished about of oxygen reaching the brain.
I can definitely attest to the somewhat diminished motivation, atleast while high. Normally though, I won't smoke before having to do work/something important for that very fact; not because I won't do the work or do it half-assed or slower...it's just a waste of a high. But then again I don't smoke all that much...JimmyMethod wrote:Personally, I don't think it's great mentally for you, at least when you're young. It tends to kill your motivation, especially if you frequently do it in large quantities.
Marijuana was made illegal mainly for racist reasons. Harry Anslinger, the man that campaigned for it's illegalization gave the reasoning "Marijuana makes darkies think they're as good as white men".Axel Grungy wrote:i think the main reason weed is illegal in this country is because they think it leads to other drugs. i guess in a way it could be, if weed just makes u unmotivated and hungry.
Thats pretty lame there... yes, it makes sense, but the law, by definition should have hte best interests of the general population in mind... The gov't cannot declare lassiez faire and say simply "oh we dont care, its your own damn fault if you die"... We cant have a lot of coke addicts running around... I dont think any civilized nation in the world has legal cocaine and heroine!!! Sure we wouldnt have national debt, but americans would now be addicted to drugs as well as being fat and ignorant..JimmyMethod wrote:
One really interesting thing I find is that the EDUCATED conservatives (that narrows the pool down a lot) think that the illegalization of drugs it much worse than the actual drugs. The illegalization leads to all the bad things we associate with drugs, i.e. stealing, killing, prostitution, etc. Drugs like alcohol and tobacco don't have such issues, but other than the fact that they're legal, they have no fundemental difference with any other drug. Also, if you legalize drugs, at least some, you get a HUGE source of revenue for the government that is otherwise being wasted because, wait for it,YOU CAN TAX IT! Imagine, the billions of dollars of marijuana, cocaine, and heroin being sold in the U.S. could be taxed 50%, the price would still drop for the buyers and sellers, because of the ease to get it and, since it's not illegal and they're not trying to cover their asses, and the huge debt the government has could be demolished in a few of decades.
go figure? how could you even possibly say that? find the figure on marijuanarelated deaths and or illness/injury, then check that against alcohol related deathsand/or illness/injury. see if it's still "much more dangerous health wise" than alcohol.elwesso wrote:its much more dangerous health wise than alcohol is..
That isnt really fair, because there are a LOT more people that use alcohol than weed!!! So of course, there are going to be more illnesses/deaths/injuries if 20times as many poeple in this country use alcohol compraed to weed!continental_drift wrote:go figure? how could you even possibly say that? find the figure on marijuanarelated deaths and or illness/injury, then check that against alcohol related deathsand/or illness/injury. see if it's still "much more dangerous health wise" than alcohol.
Well, my suggestion would be people start using "quanitifed/verified facts" to make those statements, and I really don't see that happening .continental_drift wrote:go figure? how could you even possibly say that? find the figure on marijuanarelated deaths and or illness/injury, then check that against alcohol related deathsand/or illness/injury. see if it's still "much more dangerous health wise" than alcohol.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_iss ... ancer_linkRex wrote:Well, my suggestion would be people start using "quanitifed/verified facts" to make those statements, and I really don't see that happening .
We already do.elwesso wrote:We cant have a lot of coke addicts running around...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_iss ... an_tobaccoelwesso wrote:Thats kind of iffy.. The drug marijuana may not actually cause cancer, but the stuff in SMOKING marijuana probably will cause cancer, however its not likely much different than smoking regular tobaccy.
http://vaden.stanford.edu/topi....html Quote » Social drinking is the consumption of alcohol without reaching the point of being drunk. It is drinking in a safe, legal, and responsible manner, allowing you to socialize. Three or less measured drinks (or a blood alcohol level of up to 0.05%) is considered to be within the social drinking range.[/quote]I am a social drinker. You drink rarely.continental_drift wrote:oh, and kage, drinking 3-4 times a week is NOT social drinking. I drink MAYBEonce every 6 months and it is not to get drunk or catch a buzz, and willusually only have one drink, or possibly I will have a sake when we go to sushi...
THAT, is social drinking in moderation. you are engaging in recreationaldrinking, which is fine, but lets not turn this thread into everyone thinking thatthey're the ****ing pope.
I rest my case.thekage in Cheap *** plum wine from Shnucks.... wrote:Akadama - Plum royal. $5.37 from Shnucks... its kick ***. Highly recommend chugging a bottle.
I suggest you follow your own advice. What do our different drinking habits have to do with smoking weed?continental_drift wrote:but lets not turn this thread into everyone thinking that they're the ****ing pope.
Hm. Such as?JimmyMethod wrote:Somewhat off topic factoid: In the marketing industry, many places there is an unofficial endorsement of smoking weed.
I don't think you have enough information nor experience to compare the 2substances, this has nothing to do with our drinking habits.thekage wrote:I suggest you follow your own advice. What do our different drinking habits have to do with smoking weed?
I think it's a bit unfair comparing oranges to apples (imbibing vs. smoking) so I prefer to compare the health risks to those of tobacco. Yes, most tobacco smokers will smoke a ton more than someone who solely smokes marijuana, but that's mainly because weed's effects last alot longer so there isn't the "need." I doubt filtered tobacco smoke is that much different healthwise than weed filtered through water but far less is smoked, and it's non addictive. A major Pro for me...elwesso wrote:That isnt really fair, because there are a LOT more people that use alcohol than weed!!! So of course, there are going to be more illnesses/deaths/injuries if 20times as many poeple in this country use alcohol compraed to weed!
I am talking about health in the respect, that you have a much larger chance of long term health risks by smoking weed (mouth and lung cancer, and so forth)... UNless you are a hardcore drinker, there really arent too many negative health risks by doing it on a small basis... meaningif you have, say 2-3 beers a day or a mixed drink, that is a lot different than having 3 joints per day... A lot more of the drug is in one joint compared to even a strongish mixed drink... Not mention the fact that your BREATHING SMOKE!
My sentiments almost exactly. Hypocrisy/double standards just bother me a lot. =\JimmyMethod wrote:We already do.
Just because it's illegal doesn't mean lots of people don't use it. Hell, our president used it for years.His kids use it still.
We let nicotine and alcohol addicts run rampant in the U.S. and we don't do anything about it. The difference is minimal.