ummmm, that's just TMI!!!wild willy wrote:and move the stering wheel up or you d!ck will hit it when it pops up
ummmm, that's just TMI!!!wild willy wrote:and move the stering wheel up or you d!ck will hit it when it pops up
Yes it is..But that is the only way I can accurately express my feelings for the GTO.....rjdmmfl1 wrote:
ummmm, that's just TMI!!!
Yes i"ve seen the interior and it still looks cheap, and very basic. the Gto/Holden company is Owned by GM, uses a Ls1 GM engine with mostly Gm parts, so it's american.wild willy wrote:Have you every been in a GTO? The interior and materials are better than the G....Much better in my opinion...This is not an American made car..It is made in A.ustralia by Holden and rebadged as a pontiac
Now the G has more options available as far as gadgets....
I have sadi it before...The perfect car....G35 Body on the GTO frame with interior and motor.
Go sit in one...feel the dash..feel the door pannels and the carpet..Feel the leather and the shift knob..Look at the pedals....The start it...and move the stering wheel up or you d!ck will hit it when it pops up
Basic........I'll give ya..MagicM wrote:
Yes i"ve seen the interior and it still looks cheap, and very basic.
That's what I have heard...Have not got to get into a new oneMagicM wrote:The Older g35's were really cheap as well, but the new ones are completely different.
G35 cp is not getting to 60in 5.5 on its best day.ACoupe wrote:2004 GTO Specs:0-60: 5.3-5.41/4 mile: 13.52 seconds
2007 G35 Coupe:0-60: 5.51/4 mile: roughly 14 (or high 13's)
SO I think the term "would destroy the G35" is a bit of an over-exaggeration when it comes to their match-up (and I'm willing to bet the 07's Sport handling would give it an edge over the GTO in the turns).
As for the 35's interior being "cheap", it's far from that. It's simply not up to the standards of other cars in it's class.The G37 has addressed that in spades and sports a beautiful interior, more than worthy of the price paid.
Don't forget, the G35 was the first gen of it's kind for Infiniti/Nissan. I think they knocked it out of the park for being a first attempt. The 37 is a really nice progression, although they seriously need to slim it down. Too porky for a Coupe and if it shed a few hundred pounds would be more than worthy of giving the 335i a beating.
The GTO on the other hand, has a fantastic engine, surrounded by the standard Pontiac-ugly exterior, and interior (though the build quality is excellent). You might as well call it a Grand Am for the quality of the exterior (and that is NOT a compliment), simply hideous and un-deserving of the GTO branding.
willy, remember the 2007 G35 coupe with manual transmission was tuned to 293 hpwild willy wrote:
G35 cp is not getting to 60in 5.5 on its best day.
All I can tell you.Is drive them back to back...........
First off there is no 08 GTO, 2004-2007! I also had a 2004 Pontiac GTO and the 350hp 365tq puts it out of reach of a stock G35. When it comes to modding the LS1/LS2 engines respond very well(corvette engine). Intake and headers and tune will get you 50hp at the wheels ect...Now onto interior comparing it to a Grand Am is a joke, the leather was way better then my Altima Coupes. The car is built in austraila by Holden and not your normal cheap GM crap. The dash materials are about the same as the altima, options were limited to keep the price down however.ACoupe wrote:And that chart also states that the 2008 GTO can hit a 0-60 in 4.6 (estimated), so the 08 vs. 08 would be moot.
I still don't know why there is a Porsche-like stigma on the G35. It was never designed to be a sport rocket.It's a luxury coupe, which is quick, but not blazingly fast.
You want that, buy the GTR (which I'd love to give serious thought to, if any make their way up here), which would chew just about anything you can throw at it.
If I wanted retro muscle I'd buy the Shelby GT500 or the upcoming Challenger. Two cars that are nice and fast and pay tribute to classic style.Or, I'd buy a Vette, or if I had the money, the Ford GT.
But I love the G, and what it's becoming in the 37, and I understand what kind of car it is, without delusions.
With a decent driver and no mods the GTO's put down 0-60mph in the 4.85-5 second mark and crack into the high 12's 1/4 mile then the difference is very clear. Also see my last post regarding the interior. When I was looking at cars in 2004 I did alot of comparing and was torn between the G35 and GTO, after the test drives it was a easy choiceACoupe wrote:2004 GTO Specs:0-60: 5.3-5.41/4 mile: 13.52 seconds
2007 G35 Coupe:0-60: 5.51/4 mile: roughly 14 (or high 13's)
SO I think the term "would destroy the G35" is a bit of an over-exaggeration when it comes to their match-up (and I'm willing to bet the 07's Sport handling would give it an edge over the GTO in the turns).
As for the 35's interior being "cheap", it's far from that. It's simply not up to the standards of other cars in it's class.The G37 has addressed that in spades and sports a beautiful interior, more than worthy of the price paid.
Don't forget, the G35 was the first gen of it's kind for Infiniti/Nissan. I think they knocked it out of the park for being a first attempt. The 37 is a really nice progression, although they seriously need to slim it down. Too porky for a Coupe and if it shed a few hundred pounds would be more than worthy of giving the 335i a beating.
The GTO on the other hand, has a fantastic engine, surrounded by the standard Pontiac-ugly exterior, and interior (though the build quality is excellent). You might as well call it a Grand Am for the quality of the exterior (and that is NOT a compliment), simply hideous and un-deserving of the GTO branding.
LMAO in three years and 26,000 miles I went threw 4 sets of tireswild willy wrote:One of the most impressive things I can thik of with the GTO is the lack of rattles and squeeks. The car had none, anywhere...And if you knew what I did to that car..........
4 sets, 2 years, 17K miles here..............She was punished daily.....My driveway is still covered in her rubber08Coupe wrote:
LMAO in three years and 26,000 miles I went threw 4 sets of tires
Now, I can understand the Exterior.......But the Interior??? Come on!! That is absurd. Go to a BMW Board and see what they have to say about it......Noting but good things. Any review you read on the interior will praise it........The exterior..Not so much...ACoupe wrote:I was talking LOOKS, appearance, etc. Read the post and it clearly states that. It's an ugly exterior with an ugly interior.
Ok...that's what makes the world go round...I like unclutterd, plain and tasteful interiors..............ACoupe wrote:I can't get excited over any of the shots of the interior that I've seen.The quality may be fantastic, but I just find the interior to be ugly, no matter what the Bimmer folk say about it.
Yes....I could not believe it either.........That's why I did it.....I wish I would have bought it......But I did not know I would like it so much..I never drove it, looked at it, or shopped one. I saw an ad on TV, Called the dealer and they delivered it that night in a snow storm form over an hour away:)ACoupe wrote:
Jeezum!That's cheap!