firstq wrote:I would be surprised if everyone on this board would come out and state that they knew the cost structure of a used Q45 ownership when they bought a 10 year old one of the street for around 5K [and this being their first luxo car] - but you never know.
You're right -- I didn't know what I was getting into, but almost every dollar (and hour) I've spent on the Q has been for *preventive* maintenance (which beats the heck out of repairs). Without cautionary words from this group, particularly from Dennis (q45tech) I probably wouldn't have spent even that, but I would be looking at bigger bills later.
Nothing has failed on my car in my 20 months of ownership. The knock sensors are all that failed in the 5 years previous. As far as I can tell, the knock sensors and the transmission are all that have -ever- failed! Not bad for a car with almost 170K on it! The original Q was a superior engineering effort. Compare it to V8 Mercedes Benz of the period (I have owned several -- I know), and I think you'll agree.
You have to consider the "high performance" aspect. Get "the most" out of any particular part, and you run it closer to the ragged edge of failure. It doesn't matter whether it comes from Tokyo, Stutgart, or Modena -- physics is physics. People pay $8000 for Ferrari tuneups. Worth it? Hard to say, unless you accept that there's a different value system at work.
Heck, we'd all be driving Kias if $/mile was all that was important.