WDRacing wrote:Now you're mixing an F1 conversation with the turbo conversation, which I'm ok with. Here's the deal, I said you can add forced induction to any motor and make more power and that's fact period man, indisputable. No need to even talk about it anymore, you're wrong.
Like I said: Put a small turbo on a F1 car. You'll lose power. The CFM the engine is flowing NA is greater than the CFM the turbo can flow. I never "mixed" anything. It was an example to show that adding any old turbo isn't going to magically increase power on every engine.
Quote »This whole matching a turbo to make 1000hp is retarded. What motor is it going on? What are the RPM requirements for the motor...give me a small handful of details and I'll pick you out a turbo right now. What is lag on a big block? What is lag on a motor that spins to 18,000 rpm?[/quote]What is lag? Are you serious? It's a noticable delay in power delivery. What are you even talking about in this post? The turbo generation of F1 engines had to be 1.5L. They ran at 10k-11k rpm depending on the engine.
Yeah, you can make a turbo setup that has good spool time and a good powerband. You also can make a turbo setup that produces ridiculous amounts of power for the displacement of the engine. What you can't do is both at the same time.
Quote »I made my point and simply can't be proven wrong. But its not like I thought it all up, it's just something that happens to be true, like the 2+2 thing.
WD[/quote]What was your point? That adding a turbo always makes more power? That's blatantly false. All you've really demonstrated is a lack of understanding as to how turbos actually create more pressure in the cylinder.
Also, it's a pretty sad man that has to post an "owned" picture about their own post.