my dad paid $29,000 out the door for my 3.5se and here in cali the taxes are crazy.... WOW! Canadians really got screwed over..... and ya my 3.5se is paid off already (my dad wrote a $50,000 check and got my car and my mom's 07 Maxima).CanadianCoupe wrote:I purchased my base 2.5s for $31000 out the door, and a 3.5se would have been $35000. I couldnt afford an extra $4000 at the time, but now that I have paid off my car (which most of you probably havent, especially 3.5's) I am looking to possibly make some major upgrades.
My 3.5 is paid for. Wrote the check that dayCanadianCoupe wrote:
I purchased my base 2.5s for $31000 out the door, and a 3.5se would have been $35000. I couldnt afford an extra $4000 at the time, but now that I have paid off my car (which most of you probably havent, especially 3.5's)
Ferguson wrote:I bought a 3.5. Because I could. I also drove a 2.5 and it was a very nice car.
I wish the crap about this would stop. 2.5 owners need the same consideration as 3.5 owners.
Or.... if you bought a 3.5.... AND WANT MORE... why didn't you buy a 350??
Really, it gets stupid after a while, and quite tiresome.
We all have A/Cs so let's enjoy the two flavors!
Since this was pretty much directed at me, I will let you know that i DID take it as a joke, just like my post was a joke.vonivo wrote:
I doubt it you 2.5ers are all talk and no action just like the engine it revs and starts to scream up top but still dosent do anything except get you 3 miles more to the gallon
Exactly!CanadianCoupe wrote:
I dont think most the people who have a 2.5 chose it for the MPG. Maybe it doesnt make sense to you to loose 100HP for 3MPG, but for a few thousand dollars obviously it makes a difference. We have not all been working for half our lives as you are obviously older than the majority of the members on this forum.
I purchased my base 2.5s for $31000 out the door, and a 3.5se would have been $35000. I couldnt afford an extra $4000 at the time, but now that I have paid off my car (which most of you probably havent, especially 3.5's) I am looking to possibly make some major upgrades. Now that I dont owe money, I could probably justify paying $5000 for a supercharger. If a supercharger came out for the 2.5 I would be one of the first to jump on board.
+1 well said my friendMr_Coupe wrote:ok heres my 2 cents.. this thread clearly says 3.5L SUPERCHARGER not 2.5. if someone with a 2.5 wants to make a supercharger thread or try to even get some love from sponsors by all means go ahead.. But don't complain about it go do something about it. im not discriminating against the 2.5 owners beacuse they should get the same opportunity as us.. However theres no reason for 2.5 owners to start asking questions about their own needs. If mcheddadi said the 2.5 was involved he would have clearly stated it. 3.5 owners wont get headers at them moment like the 2.5 from stillen that should be out shortly.. so u guys have stuff coming in..and i honestly think that 4 cylinder cars should have turbo not a supercharger and the v6 should be supercharged.. it can go either way but i think it should go this way. Blake did turbo his car but i think for us V6's we should use supercharge it. bottom line i havent heard any great news like this since blake and his turbo and that was a long time ago the 2.5ers got newas about headers and such.. even though we have 100 more hp i still would like to shine once in a while.
Please explain where you came up with this idea because obviously you have no experience with either. If you would, please explain any reasoning behind your comment so we can grasp where you're coming from.Mr_Coupe wrote:and i honestly think that 4 cylinder cars should have turbo not a supercharger and the v6 should be supercharged.. it can go either way but i think it should go this way. Blake did turbo his car but i think for us V6's we should use supercharge it.
dude im not the only one that feels this was about the 3.5 being supercharged.. theres other people that prefer the supercharger. i just think its better because its more daily driver friendly and easier on the engine than the turbo..there are more 4 cylinder cars that are turbo charged thats just how it is...and i dont think you read what i said (IT CAN GO EITHER WAY). i honestly don't care about you bashing me saying i have no experience. you dont know me or who i am for that matter i came professionally and u had to come at my neck for what? whats ur purpose?08altima35 wrote: Please explain where you came up with this idea because obviously you have no experience with either. If you would, please explain any reasoning behind your comment so we can grasp where you're coming from.
Make a poke at the poster thats fine but to make a poke at all Ameriicans? thats messed up. And i thought all canadians went racist well sir you proved me wrong we have a great spot for you in Alabama where they hold great big ralleys and bbq's all you would have to do to join is quilt yourself a white gown and cap.Calgary35SE wrote:Typical american math... 28000-22000= 6000.... not 5000 , i guess you got a better deal then you thought.
This was not called for. But when correcting others, it is helpful not to make mistakes yourself. What you should have wrote was "a better deal THAN you thought"Calgary35SE wrote:a better deal then you thought.