the ms3 is a sports car and the A/C isn't?PhEnoM78 wrote: MS3 is a sports car pretty much 0-60 is good not as good as coupe i think .1 off but the top speed is 155 the coupe isnt
no its really not bc its not a sports car it doesnt have any sport packages ur just sayin that bc u think it is bc u got the 6 n its not the stats n options show itmcheddadi wrote:
the ms3 is a sports car and the A/C isn't?
now that's just retarded
Can anyone translate this into English?PhEnoM78 wrote:
no its really not bc its not a sports car it doesnt have any sport packages ur just sayin that bc u think it is bc u got the 6 n its not the stats n options show it
he was saying the A/C is a sports car but its not what sports packages does it come with stock????? no special suspension, no turbo/supercharger, no exhaust, no sport rims/tires, it doesnt come like the MS3 does when its upgraded the A/C is upgraded it adds luxury not sportinessadidas2go wrote:
Can anyone translate this into English?
LOOOOOL! my thoughts exactly when I first read that lol.adidas2go wrote:
Can anyone translate this into English?
MS3 is a sports compact or hot hatch if you want:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_compactPhEnoM78 wrote:
he was saying the A/C is a sports car but its not what sports packages does it come with stock????? no special suspension, no turbo/supercharger, no exhaust, no sport rims/tires, it doesnt come like the MS3 does when its upgraded the A/C is upgraded it adds luxury not sportiness
Does that clear up my statement????
Ummm..... sorry but here in Canada a 350z comes in one package and your only choices are manual or auto and if you want the GPS. There is no sports package does that mean its not a sports car, the GT-R comes in one package does that mean its not a sports car? I guess the sport tuned suspension on the 3.5se from factory, the 17" enkei wheels over 16" wheel on the 2.5 are not sportier upgrades??PhEnoM78 wrote:
he was saying the A/C is a sports car but its not what sports packages does it come with stock????? no special suspension, no turbo/supercharger, no exhaust, no sport rims/tires, it doesnt come like the MS3 does when its upgraded the A/C is upgraded it adds luxury not sportiness
Does that clear up my statement????
Sorry but the 3.5se would leave should best a GTI or a WRX, the MS3 is faster but not by much. I guess that 3.5L V6 that was in G35's and 350Z's does not make it a sporty engine???PhEnoM78 wrote:c ur right in one the A/C is a coupe but not a sports coupe .....the A/C isn't a sports car its a coupe with sporty looks but not engine wise atleast not until u add a turbo if u do then it could be but the MS3 as u admitted is a sports compact if u want to say that but it is a sportier car look up every review on it and the coup when is the coupe referd as a sports car ive seen the MS3 labeled as a sports compact like u said but in the end they are totally diffrent types of cars a WRX would be compared to a MS3 or a GTI would be but not a A/C
Very true. The exact defintion of a "sports car", varies. However, an exact likeness lives in all of them. Driving performance is the key element of the car. Doesn't matter if is is plush or barren inside. Doesn't matter what packages it comes with. If the main focus of the car is pure mechanical driving performance, then its a sports car. Many cars can share some of the same traits as a true sports car, however that doesn't make them a sports car. A sports car's dominant traits tend to be superior handling, braking, maneuverability, low weight, and high power. While a sporting vehicle tends to create a balance of the; list above, passenger space, comfort, and fuel economyspockrock wrote:
Ummm..... sorry but here in Canada a 350z comes in one package and your only choices are manual or auto and if you want the GPS. There is no sports package does that mean its not a sports car, the GT-R comes in one package does that mean its not a sports car? I guess the sport tuned suspension on the 3.5se from factory, the 17" enkei wheels over 16" wheel on the 2.5 are not sportier upgrades??
Hi Adidas, sorry to diverge here but did you get my email?? I sent you an email (profile) about your opinion on something since there are no PMs.adidas2go wrote:
Very true. The exact defintion of a "sports car", varies. However, an exact likeness lives in all of them. Driving performance is the key element of the car. Doesn't matter if is is plush or barren inside. Doesn't matter what packages it comes with. If the main focus of the car is pure mechanical driving performance, then its a sports car. Many cars can share some of the same traits as a true sports car, however that doesn't make them a sports car. A sports car's dominant traits tend to be superior handling, braking, maneuverability, low weight, and high power. While a sporting vehicle tends to create a balance of the; list above, passenger space, comfort, and fuel economy
sent I appreciate any advise you have.adidas2go wrote:If you just sent it this morning, I can't check that till I get off work. Send it to [email protected] if you need a quick answer today
you have a 3.5se, or a 2.5s?PhEnoM78 wrote:c ur right in one the A/C is a coupe but not a sports coupe .....the A/C isn't a sports car its a coupe with sporty looks but not engine wise atleast not until u add a turbo if u do then it could be but the MS3 as u admitted is a sports compact if u want to say that but it is a sportier car look up every review on it and the coup when is the coupe referd as a sports car ive seen the MS3 labeled as a sports compact like u said but in the end they are totally diffrent types of cars a WRX would be compared to a MS3 or a GTI would be but not a A/C
Mustang Shelby is over 500hp and rwdLongBeachCoupe wrote:that means a mustang cobra isnt a sports car? (i dont like them, but it is)
GT-R does not have a 50/50 weight ratio.....not a sports cars, Audi R8 does not have a 50/50 weight distribution, close to it but not really. A Porsche 911 carrera does not have 400HP (355). Can you tell me with your rigid standards what is a sports car then?08Coupe wrote:RWD or AWD, 2 doors, 50/50 weight, 400+HP, less then 4K lbs,big brakes= Sports Car
Those are typical figueres, however, different companies make different variations of sports cars. Lambo Murcielago has a 42-58 weight distribution, the new BMW M3 comes in 4 door, and the Nissan GTR with a driver in it weights over 4,000 pounds. You can't justify numbers in doors, or seats, or weight really.08Coupe wrote:RWD or AWD, 2 doors, 50/50 weight, 400+HP, less then 4K lbs,big brakes= Sports Car
... Im gonna try to keep my personal preference out of this. If you can call the corvette a "sports car" there is no way you can say the Camaro is NOT a sports car, especially the SS and Z28 versions. Last time I was at the strip, my 94 Z28 ran nose/nose with an 05 vette with the 400HP LS2.. After that point I was satisifed with what I had done with the car and sold it *shrug* engine was bolt-on only, biggest mod was the transmission. but anyways, Camaros arent sports cars right guess that means the RX-8 cant be called a sports car huh? cause theres no way in hell itll hang with a vette or the WRX sti, or even the originally mentioned Mazdaspeed3 *shrug*..adidas2go wrote:Ehh maybe, Its really a fine line. I personally dont think anything coming out of America, short of the Viper, Vette, or Cobra, is a sports car. Those cars are built to drive. They are built with full performance aspecs in mind. I think 60% of true sports cars come out of Europe, 30% from Japan, and 10% from America
Well the Vette has multiple electronic suspension settings along with more powerful engine options than any out of the factory SS or Z28. IE- Grand Sport and ZR1 packages. A sports car doesn't necessarily have to be fast either. A sports car does not require a large, powerful engine, though many do have them. Some classic British sports cars lacked powerful engines, but were known for exceptional handling due to light weight, a well-engineered, balanced chassis, and modern suspension. On tight, twisting roads, such an automobile performs more effectively than a heavier, more powerful luxury sports car with less maneuverability. The RX-8 is most definitely a sports car. It defines a sports car to a T. Exceptional handling, near perfect weight distribution, powerful engine, light weight, and aesthetics. That car was built by Mazda/Ford to be a sports car out of the box with the key element harping on mechanical performance. It wasn't built for any other purpose other than the pure driving experience. Now its debatable whether or not it actually captured that, but it was definitely built to do thatracingtiger03 wrote:
... Im gonna try to keep my personal preference out of this. If you can call the corvette a "sports car" there is no way you can say the Camaro is NOT a sports car, especially the SS and Z28 versions. Last time I was at the strip, my 94 Z28 ran nose/nose with an 05 vette with the 400HP LS2.. After that point I was satisifed with what I had done with the car and sold it *shrug* engine was bolt-on only, biggest mod was the transmission. but anyways, Camaros arent sports cars right guess that means the RX-8 cant be called a sports car huh? cause theres no way in hell itll hang with a vette or the WRX sti, or even the originally mentioned Mazdaspeed3 *shrug*..
Is there even a real definition for sports car that everyone can agree on? LMAO!