240sx & celica.

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
User avatar
240sxin
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:59 am
Car: 87 300zx Turbo

Post

Hey guys, this might be old news but i was bord to day and i was looking a celicas and low and behold while readin the specs, the 89 240sx has the same horse power as the 03 celica gt. Now i thought that was funny cause my step mom (hanis ***** from hell) just got a 03 gt and she thinks it the baddess mother on the earth. she thinks my freinds eagle tsi awd tubor could beat her when he could blow her out the water. anyway my point is that now i can rub it in her face that my car has the same horse power as hers and is 14 years older then hers, o and on top of that my car has more torque to. well i just had to let everyone know that even tho most probly allready did. anyway take it easy guys and go beat a celica lol.~Jon


Onizuka
Posts: 8450
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 5:24 pm
Car: 91 Nissan S13 coupe SR20DET
89 Nissan S14 hatch SR20DE

Post

they should offer a AWD version of the celica... :D

sachmo12345
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 12:57 pm
Car: 1994 Infiniti Q45a
1995 Nissan Maxima SE
Contact:

Post

they used to it was called the Celica All Trac..... they are very hard to come by

User avatar
240sxin
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:59 am
Car: 87 300zx Turbo

Post

ya ive seen em they earily 90's vey cool and iver heard pretty fast but hella hard to find.

User avatar
240sxin
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:59 am
Car: 87 300zx Turbo

Post

they were also called gt-4s

BuudWeizErr
Posts: 4745
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2002 11:35 am

Post

240sxin wrote:i can rub it in her face that my car has the same horse power as hers and is 14 years older then hers,


I have a car in my garage that was made 37 years ago that has 400HP, mildly modified, whats your point?

Your car also has more displacement, yet minus one cam.

If you need to do any rubbing, rub it in that she has wrong wheel drive.

Onizuka
Posts: 8450
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 5:24 pm
Car: 91 Nissan S13 coupe SR20DET
89 Nissan S14 hatch SR20DE

Post

sachmo12345 wrote:they used to it was called the Celica All Trac..... they are very hard to come by


yeah i know, im talkin current model :D

The Mic
Posts: 5871
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2002 6:33 am
Car: 3Z Wmb
Contact:

Post

my friend has the 93 celica all-trac modded, he got killed by an Sr w/just intake and boost

Slider
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 11:42 am

Post

While alltracs are rare, getting their motor isn't that rare from Japan. Quite a few people have swapped the 3s-gte engine from japan, into their FWD celicas. Not the new Celicas, the 98 and older ones. The engine is 2.0 turbo, and comes with 225hp in japan. The same engine is also offered in the turbo mr2 here in the us. And the alltrac came with the 3sgte, so it isn't such a ***** to get parts, also it's possible to use the original transmission with the swap. Shame it's FWD though, but it's probably cheaper than a sr20det.

edit: The new Celicas don't really have much aftermarket performance wise. Altough the GT-S manual is pretty quick.

UncleBen
Posts: 7178
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 7:06 am
Car: '05 Infiniti G35 Sedan Sport
'98 Nissan 240SX LE A/T
'95 Nissan 240SX SE A/T
Contact:

Post

If you are going to get a new celica, why waste time and money on a GT? They are pathetic terds....

The GT-s' are quick, definately. They have more potential in an easier fasion I'm sure, just because you start with more power. But, the GT might be better for boost, because the compression isn't as high I'm sure.....I dunno, I dont care about Celica's. I am just BSin in a way that I think I am correct.

dima
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 2:13 pm
Car: my wife, cars, linux

Post

New celica has very stiff boby but engine is not as powerfull as can be. Boys in toyota better drop some good HP in it to make it better overall car.

User avatar
SilviaLuvr
Posts: 1295
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 8:03 pm
Car: shopping for parts going to school to become a massage therapist

Post

I got beat buy the new celica's. My boy had one when they first touchdown. We raced for fun and he beat me...just all around beat me. I had INtake and exhaust adn his car was bone stock. He got me off the line and down teh straight. Not to mench that his car was brand new adn my car is 13yrs old:pface. I heard that they (the new celica's) had some form of VTEC inside of them? Is that true..?

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

the GT is the base model now:( don't think I'd call it a pathetic turd though, it is after all a toyota, so I think I'd go with just pathetic:D

I think the celica just has another version of vvt on it, not sure exactly how their version works though...

I don't think they're ever gonna make another celica as cool as the '76 Liftback though, I want one sooo bad. I hope they make a Celica as cool as that one though, I like cool cars...

dima
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 2:13 pm
Car: my wife, cars, linux

Post

I think they do have Some VVT but it does not activated until engine hits high RPM. I'm not sure what RPM but it is probably around 5000+ or so.

ilikenissan
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:42 pm
Car: paintball, cars

Post

Yeah toyotas version is called VVTi I think. Im not sure if the new celicas have them or not. I thought that was a Supra thing? It still just an inferior design of VTEC. Like mitsubishis MIVEC, I heard it sucks really bad. Don't skyline R-34's have variable valve timing? If so what is Nissan's called? And I beat a new GT from like a 5 mph roll.. Barely but still beat him.

Chingon
Posts: 2802
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 8:45 am
Car: 1991 and 1992 hatchbacks

Post

well, altough the celica may not be the quickest of the newer cars, it does handle pretty well, and although the 1zzge which powers it, may be lacking a little hp, it's a hell of an engine. The mr2 spyder, which shares this engine, is pretty fast with it, with a 15 sec 1/4 mile time. TRD has released a sc kit for the engine, putting it in around 185 hp w/o ic. However, my engine of choice among the new engines is the 2zgge found in the gt-s.

User avatar
240sxin
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:59 am
Car: 87 300zx Turbo

Post

by no means was i disin the celica i ove em i just hate my step mom with such a passion that i thought it was funny that she thinks that her car is the biggest baddest out there when in fact its not. anyway thats all.

User avatar
prigo
Posts: 1059
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 10:45 pm

Post

Mmmmm, Alltracs... *drool*

IvoryJ30t
Posts: 3076
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 1:36 pm
Car: 95 Maxima GLE, 95 Maxima GXE

Post

the mr2 syder is quick with that motor because it weighs someting like 2350 lbs without driver.

supposedly with a turbo kit pushing like 10 psi, its in the 12's.

IvoryJ30t
Posts: 3076
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 1:36 pm
Car: 95 Maxima GLE, 95 Maxima GXE

Post

i was off, its curb weight with manual transmission is 2,195 lbs.

sequential manual adds 20 lbs. [6 speed w/ steering wheel buttons. no clutch]

i wanted one, but its just not useful. im not spending that kind of money on that size car. maybe in a few years when i can get one dirt cheap, and strap a turbo on it.

LittleBrotherSilvia
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 3:18 pm
Car: wakeskating/wakeboarding, motocross

Post

J-Spec Tuner wrote:they should offer a AWD version of the celica... :D


they should offer a fast version of the celica :)

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

IvoryJ30t wrote:i was off, its curb weight with manual transmission is 2,195 lbs.


Jebus...is that possible? That's just insane. Now if only they offered a hardtop version of it for some damn chassis rigidity, that would decimate.

Edit: Just did some quick research and found that the MK2s weight about 100 pounds less....and they're clearly sexier, and available stock turbo. Hmm...too bad they seem to have a propensity for drastic, unrecoverable oversteer.... :(

User avatar
SmithSR
Posts: 5021
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 3:16 pm
Car: 240sx

Post

Forget about the new Celica, very few new cars come close, value-wise, to their asking price. Check out the celica GT circa 1985.

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

Celica All tracs are lame. They handle like pigs and weight like them too. All-Tracs are the late 80s and early 90s models, GT4 was the mid nineties models.

IvoryJ30t
Posts: 3076
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 1:36 pm
Car: 95 Maxima GLE, 95 Maxima GXE

Post

SeVa-S13 wrote:Jebus...is that possible? That's just insane. Now if only they offered a hardtop version of it for some damn chassis rigidity, that would decimate.

Edit: Just did some quick research and found that the MK2s weight about 100 pounds less....and they're clearly sexier, and available stock turbo. Hmm...too bad they seem to have a propensity for drastic, unrecoverable oversteer.... :(
im pretty sure the mk2's weigh around 2700 lbs.

i loved my old mr2, but i lost it driving like a 16 year old...

not the best car for a new driver. after im done with the j30, ive been really thinking about a 2000 mr2 in blue/black interior and a turbo. maybe in like 2 or 3 years when they get cheaper...

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

MK1s are where its at. My friend has an NA one, its still quick and fun to drive. MK2s weight between 2600-2800lbs, they look nice, but are too...soft...like their steering, you cant FEEL the road, I drove one for a bit and it felt too disconnected/dampend.

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

kthxomg

Slider
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 11:42 am

Post

aleph1 wrote:Celica All tracs are lame. They handle like pigs and weight like them too. All-Tracs are the late 80s and early 90s models, GT4 was the mid nineties models.


In the US they were called All Tracs, everywhere else they were GT4s.

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

Slider wrote:In the US they were called All Tracs, everywhere else they were GT4s.


Ah. I just comfirmed this myself.

Shahee1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 9:00 pm
Car: 1993 240sx w RB20DET
Contact:

Post

I have a 1980 MK1 Supra Celica that I am getting rid of cause I want the 76 celica GT. There is no support for the MK1 .... the celica is a great car in its own right ... as well as the 240sx.


Return to “240sx General Discussion”