240sx & celica.

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
S13240
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 8:06 am

Post

aleph1 wrote:Celica All tracs are lame. They handle like pigs and weight like them too. All-Tracs are the late 80s and early 90s models, GT4 was the mid nineties models.


Actually they aren't lame. They're one of the best and rare cars out there on the market with a very good engine. I have owned two and will again as soon as I find another one locally. I WILL trade in my 240sx for an All Trac anyday. They don't handle as bad as you claim, I've owned two and have taken it through lots of mountain terrains and back roads with curves and they're not bad at all. The 240sx is just a tad bet better, but that's what suspension work is all about. Some cars handle better than others stock, but it's all about tuning when upgrading. I'm not sure if you've owned one, but please don't call them lame because they're not. They keep their value and lots of people look for them...lame? I don't think so...put an all trac up for sale and you'll have hundreds of phone calls a day for it. I just went to look at one yesterday and the owner of the car told me that I was one of the lucky ones that he wanted to show the car to because he have received dozens of e-mails and nonstop phone calls about his car. He wanted to show it to the serious buyers only. Anyhow...whatever rocks your boat. I'd take an all trac over a GSX or 240sx anyday.


User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

S13240 wrote:Actually they aren't lame. They're one of the best and rare cars out there on the market with a very good engine. I have owned two and will again as soon as I find another one locally. I WILL trade in my 240sx for an All Trac anyday. They don't handle as bad as you claim, I've owned two and have taken it through lots of mountain terrains and back roads with curves and they're not bad at all. The 240sx is just a tad bet better, but that's what suspension work is all about. Some cars handle better than others stock, but it's all about tuning when upgrading. I'm not sure if you've owned one, but please don't call them lame because they're not. They keep their value and lots of people look for them...lame? I don't think so...put an all trac up for sale and you'll have hundreds of phone calls a day for it. I just went to look at one yesterday and the owner of the car told me that I was one of the lucky ones that he wanted to show the car to because he have received dozens of e-mails and nonstop phone calls about his car. He wanted to show it to the serious buyers only. Anyhow...whatever rocks your boat. I'd take an all trac over a GSX or 240sx anyday.


First of all, they are fairly heavy for their small size (because of the AWD). Second because they are AWD they have natural understeer. They dont handle BAD, but they are very "bulky" feeling (eg. mini 3000GT VR4). I have driven 2 when I was in the market for a car before I got my 240. I can't say that it being AWD makes me a fan, because I dont really care for AWD much anyway. I will admit the engine is nice(Im talking 3SGTE, not sure if the older all tracs had this one), most are from Toyota (2JZ, 4AG, etc). On the other hand it never producted enough stock power compared to other brands' competitive cars (Evo, WRX/STi), although, it is debatable whether Toyota targeted that niche with the AllTrac/GT4. To be fair though, considering the time when this car came out in the US, it would have definitely been the best car for the money, considering it was turbo and AWD. But I can tell you, off hand, that the evo and sti romped it in everyway, the GT4 was sort of a bastard child, not good enough, but not crappy either. Most GSXs are crap (transfer case probs and crankwalk anyone??), only the 1st gen ones are worthy of mention, I would rather have an Alltrac than a GSX, but not a 240 =)

Its definitely a quality car, and the resale value shows that, but it being rare or having an unreasonably high value is not what I would call "proof" that a car is good.

I suppose I just prefer a lighter feeling RWD car. I would have sprung for an 86, but considering that their recent hike in value is totally ridiculous; while the 240 was still fairly cheap (aka untouched by hype) and had more power potential.

Antyoo
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 4:06 pm
Car: R/C vehicles and Cars

Post

[quote=" aleph1 On the other hand it never producted enough stock power compared to other brands' competitive cars (Evo, WRX/STi), although, it is debatable whether Toyota targeted that niche with the AllTrac/GT4. To be fair though, considering the time when this car came out in the US, it would have definitely been the best car for the money, considering it was turbo and AWD. But I can tell you, off hand, that the evo and sti romped it in everyway, the GT4 was sort of a bastard child, not good enough, but not crappy either. [/quote]

all usdm alltracs and jdm gt4's were powered by the 3sgte engine, and its just as capable as an sr.

when the 5th gen alltrac was in production, it had more power than the 1gen dsm's which were in the same category

they are heavy, no question

and i wouldnt call the gt4(94-99 model) the bastard child. when it was still being made, it had 255hp and 240~tq.

the group A(wrc spec) had 280hp and weighed 100lbs less, capable of mid 13's out of the box and for its day, im pretty sure the wrx's and evos werent too much better.

plus who wants a 4dr car?

if you compare the 2nd gen dsm's to 6th gen gt4's the dsm's are blown away. toyota quality and way more power with similar weight

the handling is hindered by the weight, which suspension mods will help.

currently there is one person performing a 3sgte swap and AWD conversion to a 94-99 style celica. should be interesting.

i would love to have a celica gt4, or even an alltrac. celicas have about as much heratage as a Z. they used to be rwd and then they went awd/fwd.

now celicas are sell outs imo. too much like hondas with that vvtli. hopefully, some day new alltracs will be made again.

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

Antyoo wrote:and i wouldnt call the gt4(94-99 model) the bastard child. when it was still being made, it had 255hp and 240~tq.

the group A(wrc spec) had 280hp and weighed 100lbs less, capable of mid 13's out of the box and for its day, im pretty sure the wrx's and evos werent too much better.

plus who wants a 4dr car?

if you compare the 2nd gen dsm's to 6th gen gt4's the dsm's are blown away. toyota quality and way more power with similar weight

celicas have about as much heratage as a Z.


255hp is roughly 25-30hp less than the Evo or STi. Group A/WRC spec (NOT COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE) version (im not so sure the specs on the GT4 where that low for wrc) was pretty much equal to the stock Evos and STi ,which in their WRC spec versions made around 350hp. Considering older Evos and STis only produced about 10-20hp less than most modern versions, Im still sure the WRC spec ones outclassed the GT4 WRC in terms of power and, most likely, weight. (Eg. WRC Evo2 made 315hp and weighed roughly 2800lbs)

4drs are good for day to day driving, this is a subjective opinion...Although the STI 22B had 2drs, but was also way more expensive.

I never said DSMs where faster.

Some how I doubt that the Celica was as popular as most Z cars (note: 240Z and Z32). Obviously the Celica has known heritage, but Z level? I think not.

S13240
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 8:06 am

Post

aleph1 wrote:First of all, they are fairly heavy for their small size (because of the AWD). Second because they are AWD they have natural understeer. They dont handle BAD, but they are very "bulky" feeling (eg. mini 3000GT VR4). I have driven 2 when I was in the market for a car before I got my 240. I can't say that it being AWD makes me a fan, because I dont really care for AWD much anyway. I will admit the engine is nice(Im talking 3SGTE, not sure if the older all tracs had this one), most are from Toyota (2JZ, 4AG, etc). On the other hand it never producted enough stock power compared to other brands' competitive cars (Evo, WRX/STi), although, it is debatable whether Toyota targeted that niche with the AllTrac/GT4. To be fair though, considering the time when this car came out in the US, it would have definitely been the best car for the money, considering it was turbo and AWD. But I can tell you, off hand, that the evo and sti romped it in everyway, the GT4 was sort of a bastard child, not good enough, but not crappy either. Most GSXs are crap (transfer case probs and crankwalk anyone??), only the 1st gen ones are worthy of mention, I would rather have an Alltrac than a GSX, but not a 240 =)

Its definitely a quality car, and the resale value shows that, but it being rare or having an unreasonably high value is not what I would call "proof" that a car is good.

I suppose I just prefer a lighter feeling RWD car. I would have sprung for an 86, but considering that their recent hike in value is totally ridiculous; while the 240 was still fairly cheap (aka untouched by hype) and had more power potential.


The All Trac was never a bastard child, it's actually very popular. There's people everyday on the All Trac boards trying to find one, but they just never do because no one wants to sell theirs. People eventually give up on finding one and settle with a different car. It has its ups and downs like you said; it does have a bulky feeling to it but does handle well.

There is no proof that the car is good, but the only complaints about the all trac is that it's too hard to locate parts and parts are expensive to replace. Not much of aftermarket support here in the states due to not many all tracs here in the N. America continent. Fortunately most parts are interchangeable between the mr2 and the all trac.

The all trac in it's days was well worth it comparing it to cars that came out the same time as it did. It was one of the cars that actually had balls, not that other cars had balls too, but it actually had a very nice engine with potential to start with. Don't forget reliablility.

One thing that is odd is that lots of people complain about awd cars being heavy and slow, but when it comes to 3k+ lbs rwd vehicles like the supra and z32 for instance people are all for it. I tell you it's hype...all about hype. Any car can be made fast. I know the supra and other super cars have huge engines that can produce massive hp, but come on...who's a dyno queen nowadays? Everybody is soo much into drifting and touge that no one cares about hp much anymore. Also, everyone that I've met always talks about the supra being faster than the z32 and rx7? Why? I dunno why, but I bet it's all about the name and so many accomplishments achieved by racers all over the world that keeps the Supra's name high. Although, I have seen z32s and rx7s at the drag strip with basic bolt ons clocking in faster times than Supras with lots of modifications. For example, this past summer there was a forest green supra that was at the drag strip. The owner thought he was a bad *** and didn't want to pop the hood for anyone to see because he was a dyno queen. Whaddyaknow? He pulls up to burn out. Stages. Lights go green and he loses to a civic hehe...the Supra clocked in an 18 sec.

But back to topic, the STI and the EVO did have more hp and less weight but that doesn't make it a better car. Nor does it make the All Trac any better than those two whether it has less or more weight and less or more hp. It's all about tuning one's car and how you drive it. Any car can be made fast like I have stated before. I know I am contradicting as to what I stated above...but as I'm typing this down...things seem more clear that all cars have its ups and downs. Conclusively, I'm just an All Trac guy like Aleph1 is a 240sx guy. :icesangel

Antyoo
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 4:06 pm
Car: R/C vehicles and Cars

Post

aleph1 wrote:255hp is roughly 25-30hp less than the Evo or STi. Group A/WRC spec (NOT COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE) version (im not so sure the specs on the GT4 where that low for wrc) was pretty much equal to the stock Evos and STi ,which in their WRC spec versions made around 350hp. Considering older Evos and STis only produced about 10-20hp less than most modern versions, Im still sure the WRC spec ones outclassed the GT4 WRC in terms of power and, most likely, weight. (Eg. WRC Evo2 made 315hp and weighed roughly 2800lbs)

4drs are good for day to day driving, this is a subjective opinion...Although the STI 22B had 2drs, but was also way more expensive.

I never said DSMs where faster.

Some how I doubt that the Celica was as popular as most Z cars (note: 240Z and Z32). Obviously the Celica has known heritage, but Z level? I think not.


the group a was commercially available(but is was only made in 94-95). came with factory water injection, anti-lag(deactivated) and a sprayer for the w/a intercooler, just like the ones used in wrc but with full street trim, de tuned ecu and quieter exhuast

didnt say it was on the same level as a z either, just said that is has just about as much.

i cant think of too many japanese cars that lasted as long as either the z cars or celicas(in the US market) and the celica may not have been a sports car, but it was one of the first sporty jap cars.

i have a 97 celica and its a great car except for being fwd. i also have a 92 240sx and it too is a great car.

both are fun to drive but after driving a 96 gsx, and a 02 wrx, i definately prefer awd.

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

Well I can agree with you that people seem to think the Supra is a lot faster than Z32 or FD...to me the Supra is all dyno queen hype. Although very heavy, for some reason I like the MKIIIs =) They are sleeper looking...hehe. I like the feeling of lighter cars because they are so tossable. I like AWD cars, but I wouldnt really care to own them, to me they are boring, heavy and usually have lots of understeer. The only AWD car Id LOVE to own is the Skyline GTR, since its more RWD biased, cept R33. no no to 10-90 torque split all the time.

Not to mention AWD is a PAIN to drift with, I dont like how you have to hammer the throttle through most of the drift, feels like less control...

mewt240
Posts: 159
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 11:59 am
Car: multimedia artwork
Contact:

Post

I drove a friend of mine's '92 celica with the 2.0 turbo JDM motor. it felt great, other that the front wheels chirping instead of the rear. makes me want that for my 240 that much more.....

Chingon
Posts: 2802
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 8:45 am
Car: 1991 and 1992 hatchbacks

Post

2003 Petter SOLBERG (Subaru) Citroen World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 2002 Marcus GRONHOLM (Peugeot) Peugeot World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 2001 Richard BURNS (Subaru) Peugeot World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 2000 Marcus GRONHOLM (Peugeot) Peugeot World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 1999 Tommi MAKINEN (Mitsubishi) Toyota World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 1998 Tommi MAKINEN (Mitsubishi) Mitsubishi World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 1997 Tommi MAKINEN (Mitsubishi) Subaru World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 1996 Tommi MAKINEN (Mitsubishi) Subaru World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 1995 Colin McRAE (Subaru) Subaru World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 1994 Didier AURIOL (Toyota) Toyota World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 1993 Juha KANKKUNEN (Toyota) Toyota World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 1992 Carlos SAINZ (Toyota) Lancia World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 1991 Juha KANKKUNEN (Lancia) Lancia World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers) 1990 Carlos SAINZ (Toyota) Lancia World Ch. (drivers & manufacturers

2 world rally championships in the last decade w/the all trac make it a great car in my book.

ps. How do you guys see so many gt-4's? I thought only 50 made it into the states..

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

Considering they cheated during 93-94. I guess so :rolleyes

And the corolla WRC was used for 1999...Im not so sure Tommi drove for Toyota that year, I believe it was still Didier...could be wrong though...

Chingon
Posts: 2802
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 8:45 am
Car: 1991 and 1992 hatchbacks

Post

yeah, I read I knew it was a corolla, but didn't know they cheated...how so? I read the car was meant for a different category...but wouldn't that be the coords. fault?

User avatar
aleph1
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 10:08 pm
Car: 1990 240SX hatch MODS: class.
Location: Fort Collins CO

Post

the rules at the time stated that they had to use this restrictor on the the cold side of the turbo I believe, while toyota used it, their placement and use of it was against the rules because it almost nullified the restrictors purposeful power losses.

On a side note, the celica will most likely end production in 2005 or 2006 and be replaced by a sport coupe in the Scion lineup, assumed xC. According to my new Motor Trend, the new cars design will be based on the JDM Caldina and the engine will most likely be a TRD tuned version of the 2.4l 4 cylinder used by the Camry...

User avatar
Doriftomodachi
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 1:09 pm
Contact:

Post

S13240 wrote:Actually they aren't lame. They're one of the best and rare cars out there on the market with a very good engine. I have owned two and will again as soon as I find another one locally. I WILL trade in my 240sx for an All Trac anyday. They don't handle as bad as you claim, I've owned two and have taken it through lots of mountain terrains and back roads with curves and they're not bad at all. The 240sx is just a tad bet better, but that's what suspension work is all about. Some cars handle better than others stock, but it's all about tuning when upgrading. I'm not sure if you've owned one, but please don't call them lame because they're not. They keep their value and lots of people look for them...lame? I don't think so...put an all trac up for sale and you'll have hundreds of phone calls a day for it. I just went to look at one yesterday and the owner of the car told me that I was one of the lucky ones that he wanted to show the car to because he have received dozens of e-mails and nonstop phone calls about his car. He wanted to show it to the serious buyers only. Anyhow...whatever rocks your boat. I'd take an all trac over a GSX or 240sx anyday.


As nice as it is, it's still a front wheel drive platform modified to be a 4wd car. It's handling characteristics will never be like the s13 or s14. It will never be as fun to drift as an s13 or s14 either. But you are right, it is a nice car. IMHO I would never take one over an s13 or s14, but that's just me


Return to “240sx General Discussion”