I wouldn't worry about this. The saw disc is rated for hard wood at 6400rpms, and this is for the teeth not the actual disc which should be more. If you look at the pic of the saw disc, to the right you can see the stock clutch disc. The saw disc is WAY more sturdy. Its probable I could even have issues since the saw disc is about 3mm in width. Also, the people doing bronze clutch discs over here have been using saw discs for a while. The problem is usually that the clutch center separates from the disc because they use flimsy rivets. That's why I bought solid iron ones and told them to use those. I'm also using all 24 rivet holes the clutch center has. Stock it only came with 16.C-Kwik wrote:Uhh? I admire the idea to try and build your own, but I'm not sure a saw blade is really made with the kind of strength to take on the loads of a clutch. Maybe do some more investigation into this aspect.
McAdam wrote:NICE! on a side note, for the flywheel, you can use a 4X4 KA24E flywheel. it already has a 240mm friction surface area thing. I have found that SOHC and DOHC flywheels are interchangeable.
Still don't know why you guys worry about the disc. It's 3mm wide, used to cut hard wood and the teeth rated at over 6400rpms, so the disc should hold up. The stock disc is way more flimsy (although it is used with a single fiber disc instead of indivudual pucks), and the guys go make the ceramic puck discs here use even smaller saw blade discs.demcj wrote:using that saw blade scares the **** outta me, but hey, if it works it works.
huguetpj wrote:I wouldn't worry about this. The saw disc is rated for hard wood at 6400rpms, and this is for the teeth not the actual disc which should be more. If you look at the pic of the saw disc, to the right you can see the stock clutch disc. The saw disc is WAY more sturdy. Its probable I could even have issues since the saw disc is about 3mm in width. Also, the people doing bronze clutch discs over here have been using saw discs for a while. The problem is usually that the clutch center separates from the disc because they use flimsy rivets. That's why I bought solid iron ones and told them to use those. I'm also using all 24 rivet holes the clutch center has. Stock it only came with 16.
I'm sure they are available, but I'm having a complete disc made for around $70 and I don't have to worry about shipping from the US and customs. And if later on I wanted to change to an aftermarket one I could.
What's the difference between copper ceramic and organic clutches?
I understand your point, and I thought the same thing. But if you look at the original disc, or may I say sheet metal, holding the original organic fibre disc (third pic) there are a few points:C-Kwik wrote:Hardwood is not actually all that hard. And it's not the speed that concerns me. It's the load placed upon it. Saw blades cut would by chipping very small pieces from it at a high rate of speed. The actual load on it is fairly low. In fact most saw don't have the torque necessary to ever break a blade from just sheer load. The saw motor will stall before that happens. A motor on the other hand places quite a bit of load in comparison. Most automotive motos make a minumim of 100 lb-ft of torque. High HP applications tend to make significantly more.
huguetpj wrote:I understand your point, and I thought the same thing. But if you look at the original disc, or may I say sheet metal, holding the original organic fibre disc (third pic) there are a few points:
1. The original sheet metal is at most 2mm wide in some parts, 1mm in others2. The material is flimsy as hell, when I say sheet metal I MEAN sheet metal3. The actual connection between this sheet metal and the center of the clutch disc is very small, compare to the solid connection I have now.
And as I said, the guys here have used it for making clutches for quite some time now. So I'm quite comfortable with it. Usually the problems they have is the disc separating from the disc center cause of poor connection and flimsy rivets, not the disc itself tearing up.
But we'll just have find out, won't we? :P
Looking around the net the cheapest I've found a 6 puck 240mm clutch disc (not even Nissan specific) is like $125. But then I have a couple of issues. 6 puck discs on the net aren't spring loaded so they are way more of a on/off kinda thing. Remember this is my daily driver so I need at least some comfort.
Then I have to worry about shipping from Miami to Costa Rica, plus the guys at customs suck big time... I could well pay $50-$60 in taxes, probably less if I'm lucky.
All in all, if this disc doesn't work I can always purchase the online ones.
They call it bronze/ceramic over here... could very well be a mistake on their part (wouldn't be the first) and they could be copper/ceramic. So performance wise, which is better? Copper/ceramic puck type or organic performance disc type?
Red Lightning wrote:Yea, I meant like balancing a tire. Because he cut off all the teeth of the blade, so how does he make sure it's still balanced.
BoostsFed wrote:this is a step toward innovative DIY; if this works well then we all know the formula for a new clutch![]()