indeedMellowZ32 wrote:not even a coked out rick james would compare the two!
he'd be like: "you jive-a** turkey, that's like saying baking soda is similar to cocaine!
I'M RICK JAMES, b****!!"
indeedMellowZ32 wrote:not even a coked out rick james would compare the two!
he'd be like: "you jive-a** turkey, that's like saying baking soda is similar to cocaine!
I'M RICK JAMES, b****!!"
YEAH! THats why.MellowZ32 wrote:because teh twoforddy iz teh shiet!!!nissangirl74 wrote:Why in the world would I compare a 240sx to a 370Z?
#yoloswag
eewww! why?Xdisaster240sX wrote:I see 240 and automatically think 240sx
You would have to completely redesign the suspension geometry as the 240Z's strut setup is pretty bad. You'd also have to chop the fenders if you're going to fit 295's on it (which you can do on a stock 370). It would take significant work (engineering level), something far beyond buying a couple bolt-ons.float_6969 wrote: But then comes the handling. I'm sure that with our budget, you could get the 240 to handle a lot like the 370, but I doubt it would be as streetable, which for me would be a concern. I had my share of "race cars" that I drove on the street and it sucks.
Not shocking.I think it's a function of age. 240Z was popular with us baby boomers back in th 70's. It was long out of production and the 240Sx was on sale by the time Xdisasters generation came up.MellowZ32 wrote:eewww! why?Xdisaster240sX wrote:I see 240 and automatically think 240sx
MellowZ32 wrote:eewww! why?Xdisaster240sX wrote:I see 240 and automatically think 240sx
Why not have a bit of both...Bubba1 wrote:Not shocking.I think it's a function of age. 240Z was popular with us baby boomers back in th 70's. It was long out of production and the 240Sx was on sale by the time Xdisasters generation came up.

BusyBadger wrote:Why not have a bit of both...