2014 Vette specs released.

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
Looneybomber
Posts: 9140
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 3:05 pm
Car: 02 explorer sprt (grn)
10 G37S (white)

Post

Quick recap
455-460hp
0-60: 3.8sec
1/4mile in 12.0sec.
The C7-Z51 Laps VIR in 2:51.78. As fast as the Lambo LP-570-4, about 2sec faster than the C6-Z07 and GT-R, and 10 seconds faster than the C6-Z51.

Image

http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2013/06/ ... -stingray/

"The 2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray looks like it’ll be offering a lot of bang for its 50-plus-thousand bucks.

Chevy has unveiled the official performance specs for the all-new coupe, and they are definitely in the supercar category.

When fitted with the optional Z51 performance package and magnetically controlled suspension system, the 460-hp ‘Vette can accelerate from 0-60 mph in 3.8 seconds, and cover the quarter mile in 12 seconds flat at 119 mph.

More impressive, Chevy’s test drivers have lapped the 4.1-mile long track at Virginia International Raceway in a blistering time 2:51.78.

The challenging circuit is often used my manufacturers for vehicle evaluation, and considered a benchmark for performance.

Based on the results from Car and Driver magazine’s annual “Lighting Lap” comparison test held at the track, the Stingray’s time is 10 seconds faster than the last generation Z51 and on par with the current top of the line 638 hp Corvette ZR1, which rings up at $113,595.

Base price for the ’14 Corvette is $51,995, which gets you 455 hp, and one outfitted like the test car will cost $56,590 when it hits showrooms this fall."


And from the Corvette forum.
http://www.corvetteforum.com/articles/c ... vealed.php

"Chevrolet released the performance estimates this morning for the all new 2014 Corvette Stingray and we guarantee that these numbers will sure make a lot of folks happy! We’ve been told that new “base” Stingray would be right up there in C6 Z06 territory and it looks like that claim is mostly spot on! Equipped with the Z51 performance package, the new C7 Corvette has a 3.8 second 0-60 mph estimate, and in the quarter miles does 12.0 seconds at 119 mph!

In addition to the acceleration stats, the new Corvette brakes from 60 mph to 0 at 107 feet and can sustain 1.03g’s while cornering.

For comparison, the C6 Z06 Corvette has a 0-60 MPH time of 3.7 seconds, the C6 427 Convertible does it in 3.8 seconds and the Grand Sport Coupe’s 0-60 MPH time is 3.95 seconds.

Chevrolet also revealed what Corvette test driver Jim Mero alluded to at the NCM Bash: This Corvette is seriously fast on the track.

On Virginia International Raceway’s 4.1 mile Grand Course, Mero put down a time of 2:51.78. According to FastestLaps.com, the C6 Corvette Z06 with the Z07 package ran VIR at 2:53.50 in 2011. Mero’s best time ever at VIR was in 2008 in the C6 Corvette ZR1 with a time of 2:45.63.

The lap around VIR was conducted in Stingray equipped with the available Z51 Performance Package and Magnetic Ride Control. The vehicle that conducted the lap was modified only with safety features like a racing seat and harness, and fire extinguisher system.

“The new Stingray constantly communicates feedback to the driver, which makes you feel incredibly confident behind the wheel,” said Jim Mero, Corvette vehicle dynamics engineer. “That confidence encourages you to attack each corner because the Stingray drives so well: the tire grip is incredible; the steering response is some of the best I’ve ever experienced; the Magnetic Ride dampers allow little body roll through the corner, while still soaking up the rumble strips when you clip the apex,” he said. “It’s just addictive on the track.”

“For the new Stingray, we set out to elevate every aspect of the Corvette’s performance,” said Tadge Juechter, Corvette chief engineer. “Considered alone, the acceleration, braking and cornering performance of the Corvette Stingray is truly impressive. More significant is how well they work together, resulting in a lap time at VIR that places the new Stingray in the upper echelon of all sports cars.”

The 2014 Corvette Stingray starts at $51,995. The Z51 performance package adds an additional $2,800 and includes the enhanced aerodynamics for high-speed stability, electronic limited-slip differential and the dry sump oil system with differential and transmission cooling. Larger brakes, a tuned suspension and 19/20" wheels complete the package. The Stingray used for the VIR laps also included the Magnetic Selective-Ride Control with Performance Traction Management option which adds $1,795 and the Performance Exhaust System is $1,195, bringing the total to $57,785."
Last edited by Looneybomber on Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:16 am, edited 3 times in total.


User avatar
stm37s
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:12 pm
Car: '12 Chrysler 300 SRT8
'11 Infiniti M37 S
'06 Range Rover HSE (Wife's)
'12 Chevy Camaro LS (Wife's)
'95 Chevy Impala SS (sold)
'04 Chevy Impala SS (sold)
'12 Hyundai Veloster (Daughters)
Location: Snellville, Ga
Contact:

Post

The American muscle top dog is getting bettter and better with time. Chevy has been raising the performance bar on the corvette for years and for the price you are paying, it is really a steal, I mean supercar performance and speed without supercar price and get this, it has the tech to go with it, truly a bargan

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

stm37s wrote:The American muscle top dog is getting bettter and better with time. Chevy has been raising the performance bar on the corvette for years and for the price you are paying, it is really a steal, I mean supercar performance and speed without supercar price and get this, it has the tech to go with it, truly a bargan
Sick!
stm37s wrote:The American muscle top dog is getting bettter and better with time. Chevy has been raising the performance bar on the corvette for years and for the price you are paying, it is really a steal, I mean supercar performance and speed without supercar price and get this, it has the tech to go with it, truly a bargan
Dont forget about the viper! The new SRT TA was literally made to defeat the ZR1

User avatar
Looneybomber
Posts: 9140
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 3:05 pm
Car: 02 explorer sprt (grn)
10 G37S (white)

Post

stm37s wrote:The American muscle top dog is getting bettter and better with time. Chevy has been raising the performance bar on the corvette for years and for the price you are paying, it is really a steal, I mean supercar performance and speed without supercar price and get this, it has the tech to go with it, truly a bargan
You're not kidding. It laps VIR in nearly the same time as the Lamborghini LP 570-4, but at 1/4 the price!

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

Looneybomber wrote:
stm37s wrote:The American muscle top dog is getting bettter and better with time. Chevy has been raising the performance bar on the corvette for years and for the price you are paying, it is really a steal, I mean supercar performance and speed without supercar price and get this, it has the tech to go with it, truly a bargan
You're not kidding. It laps VIR in nearly the same time as the Lamborghini LP 570-4, but at 1/4 the price!

I'm sure the new Vette is stupid fast, and impressive, but the 10 second time improvement over the previous vette is misleading. We're talking different skill level drivers/different conditions/different days. If I'm not mistaken the C&D Lightning lap figures were done by writers jumping into strange cars for couple lap sprints compared to a professional race driver familiar with Corvettes, having spent a lot of seat time testing/adjusting that car to coax their single best lap. I'd be more interested to see how the vette does in the hands of the same driver that set the times for C&D on the same day/time as the others. I'm sure there would be improvement, but not that much.

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

:biggrin: Note to self. This model will probably be very affordable by the time I finish nursing school. Graduation gift?

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

Looneybomber wrote:Base price for the ’14 Corvette is $51,995, which gets you 455 hp, and one outfitted like the test car will cost $56,590 when it hits showrooms this fall."

Why would you pay more for anything else? :gotme

Joel, just out of curiosity, what's your fastest lap time at VIR?

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

nissangirl74 wrote:
Looneybomber wrote:Base price for the ’14 Corvette is $51,995, which gets you 455 hp, and one outfitted like the test car will cost $56,590 when it hits showrooms this fall."

Why would you pay more for anything else? :gotme

Joel, just out of curiosity, what's your fastest lap time at VIR?
I never time myself. but In the ol' Z on fresh street tires and warm/dry conditions, last year a friend timed me for a session and said I was doing around 2:22-2:23 by the end of it. But that was the full course, not the grand course, which is what was used in the article. I've only done VIR's full and north courses.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

The GTR just got a LOT less attractive.

Hey Nissan - How about paying attention?

User avatar
AZ89two4Tsx
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:02 am

Post

Chevy is stepping up their game again! Even the new Impala looks nice. :couch

Vetts have always been a great value and undeniably reliable. I wouldn't be hesitate to buy a well maintained Vette with over 100K miles. A comparable Porsche? Yeah right.

Maybe the mid-life crisis guys are on to something...

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

Bubba1 wrote:I'm sure the new Vette is stupid fast, and impressive, but the 10 second time improvement over the previous vette is misleading. We're talking different skill level drivers/different conditions/different days. If I'm not mistaken the C&D Lightning lap figures were done by writers jumping into strange cars for couple lap sprints compared to a professional race driver familiar with Corvettes, having spent a lot of seat time testing/adjusting that car to coax their single best lap. I'd be more interested to see how the vette does in the hands of the same driver that set the times for C&D on the same day/time as the others. I'm sure there would be improvement, but not that much.
It doesn't sound like you're a fan

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

nissangirl74 wrote:
Bubba1 wrote:I'm sure the new Vette is stupid fast, and impressive, but the 10 second time improvement over the previous vette is misleading. We're talking different skill level drivers/different conditions/different days. If I'm not mistaken the C&D Lightning lap figures were done by writers jumping into strange cars for couple lap sprints compared to a professional race driver familiar with Corvettes, having spent a lot of seat time testing/adjusting that car to coax their single best lap. I'd be more interested to see how the vette does in the hands of the same driver that set the times for C&D on the same day/time as the others. I'm sure there would be improvement, but not that much.
It doesn't sound like you're a fan
Not true. I'd love to own a vette. The issue I have is I think the article is very misleading. Put that same professional driver in the previous year's Corvette (which was an impressive car itself) under similar conditions, and he's not going to knock 10 full seconds off a lap, No way.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

I wonder which year GTR they are referring to in the VIR lap time comparison... If its the 545hp 2013 version, that is pretty serious. Coupled with the fact that Chevy still offers true manual transmission makes this extremely appealing.

User avatar
gwoods
Posts: 3892
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:57 am
Car: 2013 Infiniti M37x
1999 Nissan Altima SE limited 5spd
1992 Miata (soon to be turbo)
1965 Cj-5 with 327 v8
2012 Toyota Sequoia Limited
Location: Phoenix

Post

AZhitman wrote:The GTR just got a LOT less attractive.

Hey Nissan - How about paying attention?

Unless you need a backseat, granted the GTR backseat is for kids (looks around me yep I have em).

The Stingray is not the top Corvette but doing 0-60 in 3.8 seconds when the GTR is 0-60 in 2.7 seconds, the 911 Turbo S is 2.6 seconds to 60 :lolling: . My Jag (which seat 5 very comfortably) is very low 4's or very high 3 seconds to 60 depending on traction and you can buy my Jag used for under 50k all day long.

I like the Stingray but for nearly 60k I need more straight line performance.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

AZhitman wrote:The GTR just got a LOT less attractive.

Hey Nissan - How about paying attention?

LOL, I thought the same thing. Of course, Nissan has done comparatively little the GT-R since it was introduced except raise the list price. I wonder if they're delaying the next generation because they're trying to fit a CVT in it. ;)

User avatar
stm37s
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:12 pm
Car: '12 Chrysler 300 SRT8
'11 Infiniti M37 S
'06 Range Rover HSE (Wife's)
'12 Chevy Camaro LS (Wife's)
'95 Chevy Impala SS (sold)
'04 Chevy Impala SS (sold)
'12 Hyundai Veloster (Daughters)
Location: Snellville, Ga
Contact:

Post

nissangirl74 wrote::biggrin: Note to self. This model will probably be very affordable by the time I finish nursing school. Graduation gift?
You to funny :rotfl

User avatar
Looneybomber
Posts: 9140
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 3:05 pm
Car: 02 explorer sprt (grn)
10 G37S (white)

Post

gwoods wrote:The Stingray is not the top Corvette but doing 0-60 in 3.8 seconds when the GTR is 0-60 in 2.7 seconds, the 911 Turbo S is 2.6 seconds to 60 :lolling: . My Jag (which seat 5 very comfortably) is very low 4's or very high 3 seconds to 60 depending on traction and you can buy my Jag used for under 50k all day long.

I like the Stingray but for nearly 60k I need more straight line performance.
FR platforms have a hard time with traction. To get more straight line performance, you can sacrifice track performance by softening the suspension and/or running drag slicks, but then track performance suffers. I think 0-60 in ~4sec is good enough if the track/autox handling is superb.

User avatar
alms24sebring
Posts: 7332
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:18 am
Car: '97 Nissan 240sx. First Nissan. First love. Sold.
'04 Nissan Sentra SER SpecV
Location: Alexandria VA

Post

AZHitman wrote:The GTR just got a LOT less attractive.

Hey Nissan - How about paying attention?
Its more like the Vette just got ALOT more competitive. Very impressive times. Glad Ive always been a Vette fan and it makes me like it even more.

User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post

Bubba1 wrote:
nissangirl74 wrote:
It doesn't sound like you're a fan
Not true. I'd love to own a vette. The issue I have is I think the article is very misleading. Put that same professional driver in the previous year's Corvette (which was an impressive car itself) under similar conditions, and he's not going to knock 10 full seconds off a lap, No way.
Yep, Joel hit the nail on the head. Track times are fairly meaningless unless you're comparing cars on the same day running the same compounds. This is why I never get interested in Nurburgring times, because the weather changes so much, as does the track conditions throughout the year, I've driven the course somewhere between 75-100 times when I was stationed in Germany and there were rarely two days where the grip level was the same.

User avatar
jbracy7
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 8:39 pm
Car: 94 GTS TYPE-M in a dozen pieces
Location: S.A. TX

Post

I can the same numbers out of a vh swaped z32

User avatar
gwoods
Posts: 3892
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:57 am
Car: 2013 Infiniti M37x
1999 Nissan Altima SE limited 5spd
1992 Miata (soon to be turbo)
1965 Cj-5 with 327 v8
2012 Toyota Sequoia Limited
Location: Phoenix

Post

Back in 2006 there was a guy in my Hemi club who was running high 11's in a 2 door daily driver ram... his user name was coltsteel if you google search you can find videos.

Any hunk of metal with enough power can beat the Stingray's times.. the Stingray is a sexy beast. I feel like its priced about 15k on the highside. But given the group of different Camaro options I guess the pricing couldn't really be much lower.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

We can critique all we want, but the point is, good luck finding this kind of performance anywhere else for less than $60k.

Track times are more relevant to me than a 0-60 time. The GT-R 0-60 is achieved with launch control. Dandy if you want to sit there for 10 seconds screwing around with the controls before you "show off" the launch... not gonna do that in regular driving, and without launch control, you're getting the same 0-60 times as the new 'Vette.

I'm no fanboi, but for my money, I'd MUCH rather have a C7 for daily driving duties, and I'd have no issues taking it to the track on the weekend.

User avatar
dre1507
Posts: 4355
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:41 pm
Car: Some boring Lexus that's currently at home with a smashed mouth (crashed).
Location: Miami, FL

Post

Not to mention you get to depress a clutch pedal and select gears.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

dre1507 wrote:Not to mention you get to depress a clutch pedal and select gears.
:yesnod

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

gwoods wrote:Back in 2006 there was a guy in my Hemi club who was running high 11's in a 2 door daily driver ram... his user name was coltsteel if you google search you can find videos.

Any hunk of metal with enough power can beat the Stingray's times.. the Stingray is a sexy beast. I feel like its priced about 15k on the highside. But given the group of different Camaro options I guess the pricing couldn't really be much lower.

You clearly have a different perspective of what a Corvette is than Greg, Jim or me. You seem to be focused on straight line acceleration. Problem is, Corvette is not a muscle car, it's a sports car. It handles/brakes incredibly well too. If you compare it's overall performance to its competition (all of which are either similarly priced or considerably more expensive , most will agree it's an insanely great bargain, not overpriced.

DrewH
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 11:29 am
Car: 2006 Altima SE R
2012 G37X
Location: NEPA

Post

dre1507 wrote:Not to mention you get to depress a clutch pedal and select gears.
And there's 7 of them now. :naughty:

User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post

Bubba1 wrote:
gwoods wrote:Back in 2006 there was a guy in my Hemi club who was running high 11's in a 2 door daily driver ram... his user name was coltsteel if you google search you can find videos.

Any hunk of metal with enough power can beat the Stingray's times.. the Stingray is a sexy beast. I feel like its priced about 15k on the highside. But given the group of different Camaro options I guess the pricing couldn't really be much lower.

You clearly have a different perspective of what a Corvette is than Greg, Jim or me. You seem to be focused on straight line acceleration. Problem is, Corvette is not a muscle car, it's a sports car. It handles/brakes incredibly well too. If you compare it's overall performance to its competition (all of which are either similarly priced or considerably more expensive , most will agree it's an insanely great bargain, not overpriced.
Definitely not a muscle car. Below is a screenshot of my friction circles from my test session yesterday. Note: My Vette is a C5 NON-Z06. It does not have FE4, it has FE3. This is also a National Stock class vehicle, meaning I was only allowed to modify the dampers (not springs) and the front sway bar.

Image

You can see, I generate 1.4G in braking, and sustained 1.5G in cornering. Transitionally I can get up to/near 2G.

GM built the poor-mans supercar.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

^ That.

I can't imagine why anyone who loves torque and RWD would drop coin on anything else.

My C5 with all C6 Z06 suspension and wheel/tire combo was one of the most fun cars I've ever driven. Style, comfort, reliability, and 400+hp... all for less than $20k.

Hey Nissan - Pay attention.

User avatar
gwoods
Posts: 3892
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:57 am
Car: 2013 Infiniti M37x
1999 Nissan Altima SE limited 5spd
1992 Miata (soon to be turbo)
1965 Cj-5 with 327 v8
2012 Toyota Sequoia Limited
Location: Phoenix

Post

Track times are great and I do know how to drive but 0-60 I use that every day. So my number 1 shopping point for a car is how fast can I get away from one light to sit at the next. For 60k there are a few other cars I would buy before I bought a Stingray. I would rather have a used GTR than a Stingray.

My comment about the Hemi Ram being faster in the 1/4 mile than a Stingray was response to Jbracy7 above me wth the VH swaped Z32 could do the same numbers, I guess I should have quoted him in my reply.

Nissan stopped listening to car guys a while ago, they are trying to beat Toyota sales by becoming Toyota. The things we all fell in love with are gone.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

gwoods wrote:Track times are great and I do know how to drive but 0-60 I use that every day. So my number 1 shopping point for a car is how fast can I get away from one light to sit at the next. For 60k there are a few other cars I would buy before I bought a Stingray. I would rather have a used GTR than a Stingray
You pretty much confirmed my assertion, not that there's anything wrong with that. Personally, I'd be concerned about owning a technological terror GT-R after the warranty expires, plus the lack of a 3rd pedal is a deal killer.
gwoods wrote:.

Nissan stopped listening to car guys a while ago, they are trying to beat Toyota sales by becoming Toyota. The things we all fell in love with are gone.
I agree (with the possible exception of the 370Z). But with Toyota preparing to re-launch the Supra, which has been suggested to have GT-R-like performance for $20K less, perhaps Nissan will soon wake up from their fog.


Return to “General Chat”