I havent heard anything good about these underdrive pulleys. They are bad for a daily driver car.djnastie wrote:thinking about getting the unorthadox racing cam pulley with the controller.
Yay do it. Id consider this part, especially after a good write up.djnastie wrote:yay or nay?
Hoping for nothing but good news! Maybe it'll make it on the to-get listdjnastie wrote:Ok so i ordered the Blitz Throttle Controller And now im waiting! i cant wait!
Hmm, theres nothing wrong with your throttle or car. Maybe it takes a while to get up to 60 because your car is slow with the 2.5 in it, cvt sucks, and auto doesn't help at all. My $.02.djnastie wrote:i just hopes this solves the lag that i experience when i pin the throttle. it takes a while to get up to 60. i hope this solves the problem.
SE-R2049 wrote:
Hmm, theres nothing wrong with your throttle or car. Maybe it takes a while to get up to 60 because your car is slow with the 2.5 in it, cvt sucks, and auto doesn't help at all. My $.02.
SE-R2049 wrote:
Hmm, theres nothing wrong with your throttle or car. Maybe it takes a while to get up to 60 because your car is slow with the 2.5 in it, cvt sucks, and auto doesn't help at all. My $.02.
Why don't you take some of your own medicine... The ECU is doing what it's programmed to do by limiting throttle. How is there something wrong with it when its doing what it was originally intended to do? And how does throttle limitations at 90+ high speeds have anything to do with being slow at 0-60? He is right saying the 4cylinder isn't making optimal power at the low end. The CVT's goal is to keep you at low RPMs for efficiency, not power.Hussain wrote:way to make an *** out of yourself with your 1st post . and just for the record technosquare was messing with the ECU on the 3.5se and the wire by throttle and noticed that the car doesn't allow full throttle (at 90MPH it's only allowing 80% throttle) so there IS something wrong with it and your just stupid and don't know wtf your talking about....... so do the world a favor and actually research before you get on your computer and start insulting people and saying they are wrong......... just my $.02
mrodrig2 wrote:So my argument is...
Why are people buying the 2.5 CVT, which is purposefully for economical driving, but then complaining that its not fast when they are stomping on the pedal? If you wanted to be able to control the throttle better you should have gotten the 3.5 6MT ,which is intended to have more power and shift point control. If you save the $400 that this controller costs, that's a third of the way towards the price difference of my 2.5 and a 3.5 6MT.
If this product was marketed for the 3.5 I'd say its a perfectly logical product. Someone bought the 3.5 because of its power so why shouldn't they have access to all of it. However, it is marketed for the 2.5, so I stand by saying that there's nothing wrong with the 2.5 limiting the throttle because that's what the car is for.
sorry i came at you so hard and called you names....... i do agree with you about people trying to make the 2.5 quicker to a certain extent. some people are thinking about putting Turbo in the 2.5 and i totally disagree because i feel that for that price they should just buy a 3.5se. however, this throttle controller is not giving you any power, it's just allowing you to use what power you do have to its full potential and there are different modes. you can set it to get good MPG or you can set it to waste gas and use all the power it does have. but ya, sorry about the rude commentsmrodrig2 wrote:I understand that, I like to enjoy my car as well but I feel no need to circumvent its computer system in order to enjoy it. At this point I think we can all just agree that we disagree and just leave it at that.