2.2 Stroke kit

Post by **I H8 UR DSM** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

you guys are doubting setups that are all over the web w/ dyno's mod list etc. lol

SR's have made over 600hp on stock bottom ends. THERE ARE PEOPLE OUTSIDE OF THE INTERNET WORLD>PEOPLE!!!!! :::sigh::

Post by **[Zero-S]** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

:Werd (there it is RobDET)

Post by **unfrgivn** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

If I were to cut huge holes in the side of my SR block and then put big trash bags over the holes, could I have infinite displacement?

What about if I crammed some duct tape into the cylinders, could I in essence lower the displacement and make my engine rev to the moon? :ylsuper

Post by **I H8 UR DSM** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

Try it, anything can be done.

Post by **hokiruu** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

Wow this thread is almost a waste of everyone's time. JGTC cars do use Toda Stroker kits, yes. the problem is: the only thing they have in common with your 240 or SR is the fact that they were built upon the same block and chassis. "Well JIC's D1 s15 uses a Toda stroker kit! And that's a drift car!""Yes, but they didn't learn to drift with that car or drive it to the laundromat with their laundry hamper full of dirty socks stuck together from masturbating over a full page Super Street spread with a fully built STROKED D1 s15. They also blew that engine up. Now shut the fuk up."You don't need that much power to driftYou don't need a $5k stroker kit to make that kind of powerYou can't afford that kit (I hope).You don't know how to use that kind of power (I'm sure)

Post by **SquirrelOnFire** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

cant believe how many ppl can continue talking bout the same subject long after it has been explained, cleaned out, and dried out.

uz flame 2 much , chill out...unless it makes u fell better, then i dont care, just a forum anway its not like ur spittin in someones face

Post by **hokiruu** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

Yeah, online "theory tuning" is a *****, but not nearly as bad as online "virtual confrontation"...

Post by **RobDET** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

hokiruu don't make me virtuially flip you off!:D

Post by **hokiruu** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

oh now we're gonna have to get serious. Don't make me virtually bust a cap in yo A$$.

Post by **charlotte240** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

Sorry for bringing this back up to the surface; but hey, it's a forum. First off, when I was posting that stuff I didn't mean to come off as such a know-it-all. My bad.

Anyways, RobDET, I'm not trying to argue or anything but I'm actually learning alot here and that's why I'm bringing this back up. You said that the gt300 silvias use the 2.2 liter kit. I, by no means, have raced a gt car nor have I worked on one so I'm no expert but don't they have a HP limit? I thought the 300 in GT300 was for a 300HP limit. If this is the case, then just getting to 300HP would be easy and a 2.2 stroker kit would be unecessary. Of course it would be mostly top end I would imagine. This is where the stroker kit would come into play because it would increase the midrange tourque while still complying with the HP limit. So the engine would still have the same 300hp output, but over a greater powerband due to the low HP limit and the fact that it's under-square.

Am I completely wrong with this? If so, then I'd like to know where because I'm trying to learn alot about tuning theory.

Post by **Onizuka** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

JUN's 2.2 kit is aimed at insanely high horsepower.

Post by **GodzillaFan** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

at one point, jun entered GT500 (500hp) with a sr20det powered car (2.2l)(a skyline...) ... and did well..

Post by **ItzGenX** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

The more dispacement you have, the more of a powerband you get with same supporting mods. 2.2L might give them just that extra edge to get them where they are.

Post by **RobDET** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

gtune4 wrote:on that note, gt300 silvias all use toda racings 2.2kit

it wasn't me:D

But yah in a fierce competition where a little more torque would be the difference in winning and losing i'de definately expect to see a displacement bump. Especially if it was within the rules. But i don't know anything about the japanese racing series over there.

I did read somewhere that they used the KA in some form of racing but i don't recall where.

Post by **charlotte240** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

So can it be conluded that stroking an engine does more for the midrange than the top end?

Just trying to come to a consensus here.

Post by **RobDET** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

all things being equal i would guess that stroking the engine simply moves the torque and HP curves up the graph... It does seem like it goes up more in the middle. Here is a chart of 2 mitats from http://www.flyinmiata.com (i want one) where they dyno a 1.8 vs a bored and stroked 2.0

http://www.flyinmiata.com/tech...g.pdf

Post by **RobDET** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

Also interesting to note that the power and torque RPM's don't change... that's kinda the point i was tryin to make all along

Post by **charlotte240** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

I definatly hear what you are saying. I'm going to look for a graph that just exhibits stroking an engine though because, from what I understand, boring it really brings up the top end because the engine is more of a "breather".......if that makes any sense

Website · Post by **gtune4** » Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:55 am

I saw two rednecks racing thier pickups, one was a ranger and the other was a "KA" pickup. I think the ranger beat him.

2.2 Stroke kit

Nissan Forums

Infiniti Forums

Datsun Forums

Technical Forums

Classifieds / Marketplace

Nissan Motorsports

General Forums