2.2 Stroke kit

For the RWD SR20DET cars! Sponsored by Wiring Specialties.
User avatar
SquirrelOnFire
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 7:15 am
Car: cars and computers

Post

Hi, I need some advice. I wana go big , like 400 hp big with an s14 sr20 and was wondering if its a good idea to get a 2.2 stroke kit. I really don't know much about it, except that it costs like 4 grand and seems like a nice package, but what are the advantages or disadvantages of the kit. Also down the road (if i do go ahead with the sr) when is it accualy necesary or usefull to get the kit. Also this would be a drift car for me, so would I have any adantage with this kit? Sorry for the large amount of questions, but I really dont know much about the 2.2 kit and how it does in real life. Also if installed what kind of power gains could i expect? :confused:

thx for any replys


User avatar
SmithSR
Posts: 5021
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 3:16 pm
Car: 240sx

Post

The people you need to contact are the 2.2stroker kit manufacturers. I don't think anybody will argue that JUN is at the top notch of engine tuners. Their site has an email link, so you can contact the maker of a 2.2kit direct. http://www.junauto.co.jp/produ...t/?en

A simple google search for "2.2 stroker kit" or something similar provided me with the above link to JUN auto, as well as many discussions, articles about 2.2 stroker kits.

Most people might tell you that a stroker kit is overkill.

Phil

User avatar
SquirrelOnFire
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 7:15 am
Car: cars and computers

Post

thx, i havent run a search for it yet, ill do it right now

User avatar
SWIFT_DRIFT
Posts: 1340
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 7:21 pm

Post

Damn I don't know where to flame you. Either in this thread of in the laundry parts list you posted in the Tech forum. Again I ask do you even have a 240?

User avatar
SquirrelOnFire
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 7:15 am
Car: cars and computers

Post

man, piss of and no i dont thats why im trying to learn something before i get it.

User avatar
Movingviolation240
Posts: 1681
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 2:26 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX 400hp SR20DET -SOLD
'93 Lexus SC300 w/ SP66 turbo kit

Post

I think what he's tryin to say is that you could have learned that all off of GOOGLE, but to answer your question the stock bottom end is good to over 500rwhp so you could leave it alone for a while and be allright.

User avatar
SquirrelOnFire
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 7:15 am
Car: cars and computers

Post

thank you thats all i wanted to know

User avatar
SquirrelOnFire
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 7:15 am
Car: cars and computers

Post

...for now

charlotte240
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 5:36 pm

Post

movingviolation........I'm not trying to argue with you, but do you have any links of sr20's with 500hp that have stock bottom ends? I know that the SR is stout, but not nearly that stout. I would love to be enlightened.

User avatar
Movingviolation240
Posts: 1681
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 2:26 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX 400hp SR20DET -SOLD
'93 Lexus SC300 w/ SP66 turbo kit

Post

I've seen Ken from Enjuku's car (he's at 480 right now but that's only limited from his crappy T3/T4) He'll be over the magic 5 number pretty soon since he just got a new GT spec toy. Phase 2 motorsports also has a 500rwhp SR on stock bottom end. The problem is none of these guys post on NICO so they are pretty much unknown around here. I think Scott from Tampa is pretty damn close as well.

Paul

User avatar
EZcheese15
Moderator
Posts: 6518
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 pm
Car: 2012 Juke SV
2011 Titan Pro-4X
2007 BMW 328i
Location: St. Charles, IL
Contact:

Post

charlotte240 wrote:movingviolation........I'm not trying to argue with you, but do you have any links of sr20's with 500hp that have stock bottom ends? I know that the SR is stout, but not nearly that stout. I would love to be enlightened.


I know someone who has dyno'd 409 to the ground with a stock bottom end SR20DE....as in no T. It's turbo (ofcourse), but it has stock DE internals (9.5:1 compression, no oil squirters). If 409 to the wheels is possible on a DE, there is no doubt in my mind that 500 is possible with a DET.

User avatar
gtune4
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 4:45 am
Car: toonah
Contact:

Post

if you want to do 400hp, leave the bottom end stock.build the rest and save yourself some money. the motor can handle 400hp. you may want to work on the top end however. when you are done with 400hp and want to go bigger, then do bottom end. hope you got lots of money

User avatar
SquirrelOnFire
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 7:15 am
Car: cars and computers

Post

thx for the info, i have a lot to learn

BuudWeizErr
Posts: 4745
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2002 11:35 am

Post

Wayne @ phase2 : 526.5 RWHP. I think he can crack 550 before the bottom end goes.

karter74
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 9:47 am

Post

i am not doubting the durability of the SR20DET, but yeah, they can make 500whp, but for how long. I think reliability would become an issue to worry about once you have that much HP.

User avatar
SmithSR
Posts: 5021
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 3:16 pm
Car: 240sx

Post

Karter, name any car that has a reliable output of 500hp. Exotics will be at the top of the list. Next will be factory performance cars for the masses(at slightly lower power numbers, like the Z06). There really is no such thing as reliability, in the daily driving sense, at 500horsepower from a 4 cylinder Engine.

If you're worried about longevity, well, this hobby isn't cheap or easy.

thalegend
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 10:22 pm
Car: Girls, Basketball

Post

charlotte240 wrote:movingviolation........I'm not trying to argue with you, but do you have any links of sr20's with 500hp that have stock bottom ends? I know that the SR is stout, but not nearly that stout. I would love to be enlightened.
I agree I dont think the sr20det can handle more than 400 consistently on stock bottom... if so enlighten me as well:oface

charlotte240
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 5:36 pm

Post

Making power and being able to drive that power are two totally different things.

Hell, my friends mustang made 613hp on the dyno with a 12lb blower and shaved heads. (Yeah, that is technically described as MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF FUEL being dumpend into the engine to keep from detonating). Everything was great on the dyno, but when he took it out to the strip and ran it the thing looked like the 4th of July. It was pretty sweet.

With that said, I think there is a big difference between horsepower that your engine is putting out and power that you aren't worried about driving around and/or taking out to the track for a day of spirited driving.

Sorry that I didn't specify that before.

Adam

User avatar
RobDET
Posts: 1553
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:51 pm
Car: Cars

Post

the SR20DET will hold all the power this guy wants. you don't need 500 to drift. You don't even need 300. One of the best drift vids i've seen was of a silvia with something like 240 WHP. Most normal people (no we aren't normal) think that 250 or 300 hp isn't all that mutch at the wheels. Those are the same people that think their caddy runs 12's or their rustang is putting down a legit 450 to the wheels. HP 90% of the time is grossly exagerated.

People ask how much HP i'mg going for with my swap. I tell eveyone i'll be extatic with 300 WHP and they kinda look at me funny and say "that's it"

I hate that crap especially sence they will be running 96 WHP in their civic or 230 WHP in their GT.

charlotte240
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 5:36 pm

Post

Anyways, about the stroker kit ......

Because the KA is an under-square engine, it has a natural tendancy to be more of a torquey low-end engine. This is great for a "driving" car (as opposed to a drag car) but, as everyone knows, it suffers in the top end. Of course you can slap a turbo on it and port the engine. Then you would have a very decent powerband because you still retain some of that low end torque, but the upper end is increased greatly.

The SR on the other hand is an even-square engine. Meaning that it's a little more rev happy. Not as rev happy as an over-square engine like a honda, but compared to the KA it definatly has some high end.

The fact that you were talking about stroking the SR really made me chuckle because it almost completely eliminates the purpose for the SR. You are making it an under-square engine, like the KA, but it's still not as large as the KA.

User avatar
gtune4
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 4:45 am
Car: toonah
Contact:

Post

on that note, gt300 silvias all use toda racings 2.2kit

GodzillaFan
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 10:53 pm

Post

charlotte240 wrote:Anyways, about the stroker kit ......

The fact that you were talking about stroking the SR really made me chuckle because it almost completely eliminates the purpose for the SR. You are making it an under-square engine, like the KA, but it's still not as large as the KA.


The SR's purpose? I chose the SR because its lighter, smoother, factory turbo, newer, and stronger. not because its "even-square"

any of the JDM stroker kits are capable of higher rpm then the stock bottom end...more displacement is great... especially if it doesnt add weight

charlotte240
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 5:36 pm

Post

Lighter - barely ....... if I remember correctly SCC did their SR swap and the car only weighed something like 20 lbs lighter.

Smoother - that's not even a valid point because that depends on how well you take care of your engine.

Factory Turbo - If (staying on point of this post) you were to go internal, then you are already going to replace everything with stronger stuff. Also, I would imagine that if you go with a stroker kit, then you are pretty hardcore about your SR and therefore you would probably already have upgraded your turbo, exhaust manifold, and just about everything else needed for a turbo kit so you would be getting it new anyways. Not to mention the fact that stroking raises the compression, making it harder to boost.

Newer - depends (although it doesn't matter too much if we are rebuilding an engine)

Stronger - Not if you are doing a performance rebuild. The only thing that will be stock is the block.

I'm not saying that a stroked engine will not have any top end. I'm just saying that it will be more low-ranged-biased.

So, yeah, I still think that stroking an SR is not in MY best interest. Don't get me wrong, I'm no knocking the SR. Hell, I've got one in my garage that I'm dropping in my RPS13 in about a month. I'm just saying that you would probably spend less money and have a higher return by doing a KA.

charlotte240
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 5:36 pm

Post

gtune4 wrote:on that note, gt300 silvias all use toda racings 2.2kit


I may be getting a little bold with this, but it's just a thought. Please note that I'm not stating this as fact.

I have heard that they don't use the KA engine in Jpn at all. I looked, but can neither confirm nor deny that. If this is the case, then I would imagine that would be the only reason they don't use the KA in gt300 because the only difference between the KA and SR (after doing a hellacious rebuild like would be done in gt300 where the only thing left stock might be the block) is the fact that a KA is bigger, and has a more fortified block.

I was going to mention a counterpoint to this mentioning that the SR has a higher redline, but then I got to thinking about it. Of course the SR is going to have a higher redline. It's a square engine. I thought about this because I remembered reading a post of some kid asking about raising the redline on his KA and the only definative answer was to destroke it.

Like I said before, this is just a thought that I threw out there.

User avatar
RobDET
Posts: 1553
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:51 pm
Car: Cars

Post

anyway

he didn't ask anything about the KA...It's been a while sence someone has said "no that idea is stupid do the KA" 'cmon man.

and the SR is smoother. It has nothing to do with engine maintenence. KA well maintained = Horrible abov 5k in the NVH departmentSR well maintained = Smooth abov 5k in the NVH department

User avatar
RobDET
Posts: 1553
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:51 pm
Car: Cars

Post

oah and while were at it... only the B16 is over square in hondas. All the other 4 cyl's (maybe not the S2k) are under square.

User avatar
RobDET
Posts: 1553
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:51 pm
Car: Cars

Post

bore then strokeB18C1, B18C5: 3.189 3.433 B18A1, B18B1 : 3.189 3.504 B17A1: 3.189 3.205 B16A1, 2, 3: 3.189 3.047 :thinker H22A1: 3.425 3.571 H23A1, H23A4: 3.425 3.740 D16Y7, Y8, z6: 2.953 3.543 B20B4: 3.307 3.504D16A6: 2.953 3.543

Just had to look it up to be sure... and yes you could be and are wrong.

User avatar
RobDET
Posts: 1553
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:51 pm
Car: Cars

Post

SOOOO it follows that you don't HAVE to have an over square engine to revv. Ask the all motor honda guys... What RPM an engine makes peak hp at is all cams and intake manafold design. Stroking a sr20 isn't goign to kill it's top end at all.

User avatar
gtune4
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 4:45 am
Car: toonah
Contact:

Post

if the ka was never made, the world could be a better place

User avatar
RobDET
Posts: 1553
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 5:51 pm
Car: Cars

Post

where is the word guy when i need him!


Return to “SR20DET Forum (rear-drive)”