Carl I may hit you up this week, we're trying to work out information on our BINs and xdf's, some of the maps are kinda weird.Carl H wrote:very cool indeed but a few points...1) pressure check the charge pipe, the welds on your exhaust and charge piping look porous.2)get a wideband asap...narrowband is a complete joke.3)you need to do a maptrace if possible and back timing off, 46* is alot of timing even with ~4psi you idealy need an egt gauge to make sure you're not roasting your pistons.
keep up the good work, if you need help constructing a map lmk.
Pressure doesn't seem to be a problem at this point, I did check part of it and rewelded a few spots that had small holes. I still need to redo the front section of the compressor pipe as it currently hangs too low.Carl H wrote:very cool indeed but a few points...1) pressure check the charge pipe, the welds on your exhaust and charge piping look porous.2)get a wideband asap...narrowband is a complete joke.3)you need to do a maptrace if possible and back timing off, 46* is alot of timing even with ~4psi you idealy need an egt gauge to make sure you're not roasting your pistons.
keep up the good work, if you need help constructing a map lmk.
T45 wrote:Careful, that could also mean some nasty ring blow-by. I would run a compression check on all cyl's before continuing.
I don't think the problem is with blowby but with boost entering the crankcase thru the PCV ventilation hose. The solution is to either divorce the PCV inlet or to move it to before the turbo.T45 wrote:Careful, that could also mean some nasty ring blow-by. I would run a compression check on all cyl's before continuing.
I think you should try a trial separation first with counseling.sijoko wrote:
I don't think the problem is with blowby but with boost entering the crankcase thru the PCV ventilation hose. The solution is to either divorce the PCV inlet or to move it to before the turbo.
Thanks! One never gets tired of hearing that. Makes all the hard work worth while.ILuvNkdChx wrote:I can't say anything that hasn't already been said! GREAT JOB!
You are mnaking me want to try to do a system similar to yours but using a pair of say 16g's mounted under the car. Trans is currently busted so the car is down anyway, might play around with it while it is down.qsiguy wrote:
Thanks! One never gets tired of hearing that. Makes all the hard work worth while.
Forget this method or even just adding a check valve. I've been thinking about this and realized that this breather line feeds fresh air to the crankcase under normal driving to mix with crankcase vapors and blowby which then goes through the PCV valve. If I install this setup or even just a check valve it would render this breather useless. I was assuming that this line was primarily to vent the crankcase but it's not.qsiguy wrote:
I wanted to update my response to this post. I originally said that the version of ECUTalk I was using was +15* off on timing. It is actually +35* off. The new version of ECUTalk, v 1.3.3 Bata 4, has a correction option for US spec to adjust -35* of timing on the gauge. I haven't tried it yet but will be shortly.Carl H wrote:very cool indeed but a few points...1) pressure check the charge pipe, the welds on your exhaust and charge piping look porous.2)get a wideband asap...narrowband is a complete joke.3)you need to do a maptrace if possible and back timing off, 46* is alot of timing even with ~4psi you idealy need an egt gauge to make sure you're not roasting your pistons.
keep up the good work, if you need help constructing a map lmk.