Yup, those will work. They are dual bolt pattern with 5x100 and 5x114.3 (5x4.5 = 5x114.3 metric). The offsets are bit off as the Rogue is +40mm... but this should not be a big issue. Wheel bearing life, handling, etc should not be affected.jmcavalieri wrote:These are the rims I was looking at:
http://www.elementwheels.com/p...85blk
Will these work? I noticed on tirerack.com that any rims you purchase come with the hub centric rings, from what I see this elementwheels.com does not include that.. I just can't stand the rims at tirerack.com.. They're ugly!!
Any other suggestions of websites to order good rims?
From our site sponsor, tirerack.com:sileung wrote:sorry to sound niave, but what is/are hub centric rings and what do they do?
This is a common question. Typically, any properly installed aftermarket component such as wheels should not deny you warranty coverage. However, if the component is found to be the cause then Nissan can deny warranty coverage.blanca wrote:will changing wheels affect the warranty i like the ones on casperfun
This is the place.Tommy Joe BLUE wrote:EDDNOG we have the same color. Where did you find the chrome door and mirror fittings?
I feel a noticibly stiffer ride with my 19" setup compared to my stock 17" setup, so 20" would be stiffer still (though probably still quite tolerable).Tommy Joe BLUE wrote:Has anyone put 20" wheels or 22" wheels on their Rogue yet? What is the difference in ride quality and handling/steering response. I am interested in 20s and i would like to be prepared.
While I can vouch for Tire Rack's noise rating, I'm not that sure about ride quality rating, because for one, tire noise level will affect one's perception of tire ride quality (so quieter tires automatically will register to the human sensory experience as riding smoother when they may be the same) and for two, air pressure level will affect ride quality more than choice of tire (given the same amount of air pressure in comparison). I am sure that the rating on Tire Rack has merit when we're comparing tires with a large number of reviews since a higher average will definitely indicate a better ride quality, I can't say with certainty that a 6.9 ride quality rating versus a 9.1 on tire rack indicates solid proof of difference in ride quality--at least, not with certainty that it will (or won't) make up for such a drastic reduction in tire profile.Tommy Joe BLUE wrote:Thanks Edd. You are my new inspiration.
On the topic of ride stiffness. Shouldn't a move from a tire given a 6.9 for ride comfort to a tire given a 9.1 for ride comfort (TIRE RACK) make up for some of the additional ride stiffness caused by moving from 17" to 20"?
That is what a local shop told me. I just want to make sure it is not all BS.
While acceleration will experience minimal change, the increased unsprung weight will affect grip and handling over uneven or rough pavement or unpaved paths. While the reduction in sidewall height will improve steering responsiveness to a certain extent and also slightly reduce dive/squat/lean, the tire tread also has a significant effect on steering response and on-center feel, and I'm pretty much completely sure you did get identical tires as stock at that wheel size.Tommy Joe BLUE wrote:The 20s just came in and the tires do not look like they have much of a sidewall at all. I am already beginning to regret this decision. My wife will not allow me to hear the end of it. Now that I have ordered the wheels and they are in the shop the guy is telling me that the new wheel assembly will be 14 lbs heavier than the old one (41 - 55). So that would be an additional 56lbs.
I guess my main question would be do you think that the car is going to drive sluggish with the additional weight? Or would the increased rim percentage of the wheel assembly allow for the vehicle to be more responsive as well and counteract the reduction in responsiveness due to the wheel assembly’s increased weight?
Tire grips depends on a lot of factors. At a certain point it becomes a law of diminishing returns...EddNog wrote:I expect your ride will be quite a lot stiffer compared to stock, but if you're lucky at least you'll have more grip and more responsive handling (at least in the dry) compared to stock as a benefit for the...losses. -Ed
philipa_240sx wrote:
Tire grips depends on a lot of factors. At a certain point it becomes a law of diminishing returns...
Heavier low profile wheels and tires will not respond quickly to ruts and bumps. As a result, the tire 'bounces' more and loses grip. A secondary problem is brought on by very short sidewalls... it does not allow the tire to flex enough to maintain contact with the road. In effect you end up riding on the outside edges while cornering...
EddNog wrote:...While acceleration will experience minimal change, the increased unsprung weight will affect grip and handling over uneven or rough pavement or unpaved paths...
This is absolutely true in a race environment, and I agree; that being said, in a race environment, stiffer spring rates and stiffer damping, plus recalibrated suspension geometry to take advantage of said stiffer springs and dampers allow race cars to take achieve that optimal handling while keeping to the smallest wheels that will clear the brakes. This is my philosophy as well when it comes to racing. On the other hand, I think that with a car driven on the street, those high spring and damper rates aren't liveable, so we have to compromise with much lower spring and damper rates. Additionally, the vast majority of street cars cannot adjust spring or damper rate; what we can do is adjust air pressure and sidewall stiffness. Therein lies further compromise, or the difficulty of achieving an optimal balance.philipa_240sx wrote:Funny, the trend towards big rims and low profile tires is the exact opposite to what done in racing. For best grip and performance you want the smallest diameter wheel (that will still clear the brakes) and the widest tire. I used to race, and none of us ever ran anything bigger than 16's or 17's. And that size was dictated by the brakes... we would have liked to go smaller!
We are having a lot of issues with our forum software and our service provider. We are in the process of migrating the forums to a new system... but we have to sort out the bugs of importing the forum data before we go live.EddNog wrote: PS What's this forum running off of, an 80386 SX/25 with turbo disabled?!?