VimyJ wrote:http://english.pravda.ru/main/....html
90Q45blue wrote:To say a report on oil from a society promoting renewable energy isn't objective is non sequiter isn't it?
Nick![]()
szhosain wrote: Ranging from Soviets fighting UFO's to a girl with x-ray vision!
Yeah, right!
Z
VimyJ wrote:I definitely appreciate your cynicism. However all sources of intelligence must be reviewed. Did you read the last "EnergyShortage" link? It is by far the best for getting an idea of the current world oil resource. Don't worry more links coming for every perspective. Those were just the latest ones I've read.
90Q45blue wrote:It's not cynicism; it's skepticism. ALWAYS question the source on everything you read. I did read that last link and found it to be quite informative.
Nick![]()
Have you read the "Salzburg" link? Did you hear about the major capital GM and Ford have committed to hybrid systems that was announced today? There's a change in the weather, mon fere.ShadowKnight006 wrote:I look at it this way, if the oil supply was in as bad of shape as the general public is lead to believe, the major automotive companies would not still be producing a majority(almost all) of their vehicles based around a gasoline engine. Also, if the gas prices level off at $5 its reasonable for a non-daily drive but a daily driver will be another story.
VimyJ wrote:Have you read the "Salzburg" link? Did you hear about the major capital GM and Ford have committed to hybrid systems that was announced today? There's a change in the weather, mon fere.
ShadowKnight006 wrote:Yes, I read it, I remain on convinced. As for the car companies getting more serious about hybrids, yes they are developing was to SAVE on mpg but not replacing it. Companies have been claiming savings on mpg for ages, this is just a new way to do so. When they start to fully replace gasoline engines with something else, I will worry.
See what happens when you research something? I try not to take things at face value and research both sides of a proposition. I have a scientific background and try apply the principle of the scientific method. This could be why some of my posts strike you as being "whacky" as they are literally uncommon knowledge. I liked the comment in the last link I provided that went, "When you talk to people about the looming energy shortage, their eyes start to glaze over."Nathan wrote:VimyJ, I usually think things you post are a little whacky but after writing a paper on this, I'm quite worried about it tooNECAR 5 is looking damned promising to me right now. I really wouldn't mind an alternative fueled vehicle for daily driving with my gas guzzling 240 for weekend fun at the track.