'07 Jeep Rubicon

[Urabus GodofTraction]

uh i disagree,the cj was one of the original wranglers and didn't come with a 4.0 they came with the 4.2 which happens to be what came in the yj's for a few years.And the square headlights just make it easier to stand out in a crowd of tj's/jk's with 6 inch lifts and 37's who go crawling to the mall and think their badass.so leave the 4x4 talk to the people who know what their talking about jackass.i've built 5 rigs pretty much from the ground up that are specifically designed for driving 75 to the trail,beating the absolute s*** out of it,and then driving home without problems and that's exactly what the owners do and have no problems.

Perhaps YOU should leave the 4x4 talk to people who know what they are talking about, jackass.

Now, I see how your tiny pin-head brain got confused, because duur, CJs look like Wranglers so duur they must be Wranglers, but they are not. Production of the Wrangler started in 87 with the YJ, the square-headlighted bastard. That also nips the semi-problematic statement with the 4.2L YJ.

Aduuuuuuur.

[Jesda]

I drive to the mall.

[Oatmealman]

Hey charlieo toggle my switches paper-bag.I'm more than well aware that cj's aren't wrangler honeystick.They are the predecessor to the wrangler and yes your right the wrangler started in 87 BASED OFF THE CJ DESIGN MEGATRON.The 4.2l was used from 71-90 that's a little bit longer of a production run than the 4.0 has had.Have you ever built a 4 wheeler? No so shut the duck in the wire trap and go put out a fire.Like i said 5 rigs that will easily do 75 down the highway,wheel hard technical trails that would make you squat in your pants,and then drive home to be DD to work the next day.I don't buy rocks either,i fabricate it all.GOD BLESS AMERICA YOU ARE A GIANT PAPER-BAG,I'M SURPRISED NO ONE HAS KILLED YOU WITH MY AWESOME JOKES YET.

oh and one more thing to point out how stupid everyone is as a child,since the cj frame wasn't boxed and the leafsprings/axles would rip out from under the frame in an accident jeep boxed the yj frame and added trackbars to help with the problem(not necessary though).the yj is the original wrangler if you wanna get technical.

"IT'S SO FLUFFY!"

edited by Dano, OMM just let his anger get the best of him, he's bigger than that though, and will refrain from outburts like this hopefully.

[Bubba1]

I had a good friend in college that had an late 60's/early 70's CJ5. Real jeep. No plastic, a metal dash (to which he mounted a beer bottle opener) The only other improvement he did to it was a nice rollbar. Didn;t need anything. It was like a tank. No a/c, no plastic, manual transmission, removeable doors, fold down windshield, dreadful stiff ride, and slow, but it didn't matter. It was a hoot. the new ones just don't impress me.

[Urabus GodofTraction]

Hey charlieo toggle my switches paper-bag.I'm more than well aware that cj's aren't wrangler honeystick.They are the predecessor to the wrangler and yes your right the wrangler started in 87 BASED OFF THE CJ DESIGN MEGATRON.The 4.2l was used from 71-90 that's a little bit longer of a production run than the 4.0 has had.Have you ever built a 4 wheeler? No so shut the duck in the wire trap and go put out a fire.Like i said 5 rigs that will easily do 75 down the highway,wheel hard technical trails that would make you squat in your pants,and then drive home to be DD to work the next day.I don't buy rocks either,i fabricate it all.GOD BLESS AMERICA YOU ARE A GIANT PAPER-BAG,I'M SURPRISED NO ONE HAS KILLED YOU WITH MY AWESOME JOKES YET.

oh and one more thing to point out how stupid everyone is as a child,since the cj frame wasn't boxed and the leafsprings/axles would rip out from under the frame in an accident jeep boxed the yj frame and added trackbars to help with the problem(not necessary though).the yj is the original wrangler if you wanna get technical.

"IT'S SO FLUFFY!"

Hello! Aren't you pleasant! I said, and I quote:

I think Wranglers with square lights and no 4.0L aren't real Jeeps.

You then fired back with (and I put it in bold because you're, well, slow...):

uh i disagree,the cj was one of the original wranglers

To which I remarked (again with the bold, I understand your handicap and am here to help):

CJs look like Wranglers so duur they must be Wranglers, but they are not.

You then commented:

I'm more than well aware that cj's aren't wrangler honeystick.

So, why, when I said Wranglers, did you prattle on about 4.2L CJs? Are you suffering from memory loss or early-onset senility? That is sad. Have you sought medical attention? I would. I'm no doctor, though so please don't construe this as medical advice and then get all upset on me.

Protip: You'd probably get taken more seriously if you didn't type like an extra from Idiocracy.

[Otto.]

Hey charlieo toggle my switches paper-bag.I'm more than well aware that cj's aren't wrangler honeystick.They are the predecessor to the wrangler and yes your right the wrangler started in 87 BASED OFF THE CJ DESIGN MEGATRON.The 4.2l was used from 71-90 that's a little bit longer of a production run than the 4.0 has had.Have you ever built a 4 wheeler? No so shut the duck in the wire trap and go put out a fire.Like i said 5 rigs that will easily do 75 down the highway,wheel hard technical trails that would make you squat in your pants,and then drive home to be DD to work the next day.I don't buy rocks either,i fabricate it all.GOD BLESS AMERICA YOU ARE A GIANT PAPER-BAG,I'M SURPRISED NO ONE HAS KILLED YOU WITH MY AWESOME JOKES YET.

oh and one more thing to point out how stupid everyone is as a child,since the cj frame wasn't boxed and the leafsprings/axles would rip out from under the frame in an accident jeep boxed the yj frame and added trackbars to help with the problem(not necessary though).the yj is the original wrangler if you wanna get technical.

"IT'S SO FLUFFY!"

[Dano]

Guys, cool it or quit it. Civilized arguements please. I edited your posts to something everyone can read.

OMM, I know you were mad but it got the best of you, I know your bigger than that.

[wingFeather]

"I talked them down $5,000 to $48,000."

Pleas tell me you then then 'd this beotch!!! She could've bought a Ferrari 348...

or FOUR 90's Jeeps.

[Oatmealman]

dano sorry it got out of control

[S13_love]

I can think of NUMEROUS people I know personally who would do EXACTLY that.

x 2

[driverdriver]

I miss my Jeep.......untill I think about the fuel economy and rough ride over any surface. Then I miss it less.

[Dano]

It happens, I know your bigger than that.

[nissangirl74]

"I talked them down $5,000 to $48,000."

Pleas tell me you then then 'd this beotch!!! She could've bought a Ferrari 348...

or FOUR 90's Jeeps.

Nah. I figure reality smacks her at least once a month as it is. It must suck writing that check every month.

[IBCoupe]

How about an FJ40?

[AZhitman]

If we were gonna go that far, I'd just get her a Patrol.

[truckmtr240]

My friend has a newer jeep. Everything in the car is broken and it doesn't have that high of miles. I don't know much about old jeeps but the 90+ models seem like garbage.

[Oatmealman]

yup pretty much any jeep after the yj series is absolute junk.

as far as the fj40's go the axles are weak and the engine are underpowered other than that they kick a**.My buddy with lifted built ranger got yanked out of a mudpit by one,quite impressive although the guy had a 350 and fj80 axles under it with 37's.