The R36 GTR (r35 GTR) a HUGE PILE OF s***? | First < 1 2 Last |
|
| Author |
Post |
neobluepill

Offline
23 posts
1997 240sx sr bk, n' a 32
upstate ny
11-25-2004
|
| « Re: (themadscientist) | 5:51 PM 10/4/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by themadscientist » | I hate the R35 but I must say your textual fumblings and complete and utter unequivocal lack of knowledge about what you are talking about yet at the same time in possession of a baseless adamant opinion are much more irritating then the gizmo-R. Please immediately purchase one and crash it into a tree so I might enjoy a two for one. |
Wow you are good with the typing skills. I voiced my opinion, to see what people had to say, start a debate, gain some knowledge. I am typing from America, not sure where you are but hear speech is free(so i did it). And to say that you would enjoy seeing me get into a car accident because I was mis-informed, or have bad typing skills is the dumbest thing I have herd. Were all on hear to talk about what we love; no???
|
neobluepill

Offline
23 posts
1997 240sx sr bk, n' a 32
upstate ny
11-25-2004
|
| « Re: (neobluepill) | 6:07 PM 10/4/2009 |
|
Nice to meet everyone else in hear. Thank you for all the time you guys spent typing out all the great info. I really appreciate it, theirs no one I talk to around me that knows anything about anything(mostly people that drive Honda (s)). If anyone else has any other good points on the subject please post them I am all ears.
|
slipknot555_666_69

Offline
283 posts
91 nissan 240sx
Fernandina Beach FL
10-24-2008
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (r35 GTR) a HUGE PILE OF s***? (neobluepill) | 6:13 PM 10/4/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by neobluepill » | Why badge The new TT version of the 300zx-350z-370z a skyline? Why would Nissan give in to a marketing department for the 1st time in a major way? Who thinks this car is "cool"? Did the end of group A kill the GTR? How on earth can you people that own these new 300zx tt 2+2 cars think that a paddle shifter is great(Cuz it shifts faster then you can??? If you were one of the ppl that bought this car would you still have bought it if it was labeled the 370z tt 2+2? for the same amount of money or was the $50 badge what did it? What story's did salesman at the dealership tell you about the blood lines of the car(that don't exist)? Hows that sat nav working out for you? Are you ok that the car is heavier then the 32,33,34,35? Do you ppl that own the car own the newest m3 as a 2nd car? I need answers. Thank you |
GO BACK TO THE HONDA FORUMS
|
Gold Digger
RB/Skyline Moderator

Online
5850 posts
1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec Midnight Purple 50cc Honda Zoomer
Somewhere across the pond
4-11-2004
|
| « Re: (neobluepill) | 8:16 PM 10/4/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by neobluepill » | Wow you are good with the typing skills. I voiced my opinion, to see what people had to say, start a debate, gain some knowledge. I am typing from America, not sure where you are but hear speech is free(so i did it). And to say that you would enjoy seeing me get into a car accident because I was mis-informed, or have bad typing skills is the dumbest thing I have herd. Were all on hear to talk about what we love; no??? |
The thing is, though, is that all the information we gave you is easily available on the internet. A bit of research could yeild you mass amounts of info. But you voiced an opinion before doing said research which made you look un-prepared, and the wolves feasted. You wanted to be given information instead of taking a bit of time researching what you were asking, that's why some of the people that posted as harshly as they did. It's all out there, everything you want to know about the Skyline (and it's history) as well as the Fairlady Z (and its history, too). Just need to spend a bit more time looking before making uneducated statements. As for themadscientist, don't worry about him. He's just an old crotchety fart that also likes debating, but tends to bring guns to a knife fight.
 GET YOUR STUFF POWDER COATED! NICO's GT-R club portal!
|
themadscientist
Super Moderator

Offline
21950 posts
staring down at you with disdain from the
spooky mountaintop castle
11-12-2002
|
| « Re: (Gold Digger) | 5:32 AM 10/5/2009 |
|
Hey! I resemble that remark.
BRINGING SEXY BACK
|
Bootstrap

Offline
65 posts
Port Orange Florida
9-17-2009
|
| « Re: (neobluepill) | 6:30 AM 10/5/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by neobluepill » | | I am typing from America, not sure where you are but hear speech is free(so i did it). |
So your one of the stereotypical "AMERICAN f*** YEAH!!!!!" type then huh? I live in the U.S. to as do most of us, idk how you manage to even get the internet with your lack of intelligence, I'm sorry Nissan has better motors then Chevy and ford and dodge, but you just gotta live with it, no need to be a racist against such great cars. Try doing some research with your newly discovered tool (Internets) instead of starting fights with a major lack of knowledge on the topickthnxbai i go eat cheezeburger P.S. Your English sucks.
Currently in the market for a new Z in the Florida area.
|
Rare_f8

Offline
2238 posts
1990 300zx 2+2
Rapid City SD
10-7-2007
|
| « Re: (Bootstrap) | 5:31 PM 10/5/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by Bootstrap » | So your one of the stereotypical "AMERICAN f*** YEAH!!!!!" type then huh? I live in the U.S. to as do most of us, idk how you manage to even get the internet with your lack of intelligence, I'm sorry Nissan has better motors then Chevy and ford and dodge, but you just gotta live with it, no need to be a racist against such great cars. Try doing some research with your newly discovered tool (Internets) instead of starting fights with a major lack of knowledge on the topickthnxbai i go eat cheezeburger P.S. Your English sucks. |
I think he is now aware that even if free speech is protected. He still is dealt the consequences. His word value to another ear is become worthless. And his own image to another is tarnished. And respect for him will not be spared. Which in turn is the cost of "free" speech. So stop beating the dead whore (the topic).
All Work, No Play, Make Rare Dull Boy
|
Seanzyyy

Offline
40 posts
Tucson AZ
5-31-2009
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (r35 GTR) a HUGE PILE OF s***? (neobluepill) | 9:47 PM 10/27/2009 |
|
lol at OP
|
neobluepill

Offline
23 posts
1997 240sx sr bk, n' a 32
upstate ny
11-25-2004
|
| « Re: (Gold Digger) | 10:04 PM 10/27/2009 |
|
Appreciate the critique. I will read around some more b4 posting, but searching the forums has always been confusing for me I haven't got a strategy down for it. I'm not on them much, to busy working to pay for my cars/bills, I guess. | Quote, originally posted by Gold Digger » | The thing is, though, is that all the information we gave you is easily available on the internet. A bit of research could yeild you mass amounts of info. But you voiced an opinion before doing said research which made you look un-prepared, and the wolves feasted. You wanted to be given information instead of taking a bit of time researching what you were asking, that's why some of the people that posted as harshly as they did. It's all out there, everything you want to know about the Skyline (and it's history) as well as the Fairlady Z (and its history, too). Just need to spend a bit more time looking before making uneducated statements. As for themadscientist, don't worry about him. He's just an old crotchety fart that also likes debating, but tends to bring guns to a knife fight. |
|
neobluepill

Offline
23 posts
1997 240sx sr bk, n' a 32
upstate ny
11-25-2004
|
| « Re: (neobluepill) | 10:08 PM 10/27/2009 |
|
Just curious, who in hear would rather drive the gtr over a Skyline (gtr)? I mean if the money really didn't mater.
|
EgoManiac77

Offline
29 posts
89 240, RB20, r32 front end ,right hand drive
Quincy ill
3-12-2008
|
| « Re: (neobluepill) | 10:21 PM 10/27/2009 |
|
really don't want to be a hater, but once again if u would have done just a lil research u would find that almost all professionals that have driven the R35 against the R34 agree that the 35 is more of a luxury car and deviates from the pure race feel that all other GTRs have.
|
AZhitman
CEO

Offline
49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002
|
Yeah.And it'll hand an R34 its a$$ all day long. Really, there's way too much babbling in this thread from people who dont know what they're talking about. Drive one on a track, at speed, and you'll see. Until then, you may as well be discussing macrame projects.
Project G35 Coupe For SaleTEAM NICO: 137,000 Nissan enthusiasts strong.
NICOclub on Facebook AZhitman on MySpace Love it here? Add a link to NICOclub to your site! 
This site dedicated to the memory of Stacey Lynn Childs 1970-2007
|
neobluepill

Offline
23 posts
1997 240sx sr bk, n' a 32
upstate ny
11-25-2004
|
| « Re: (EgoManiac77) | 6:04 AM 10/28/2009 |
|
I know what they all said I have watched this car develop from rumors, to leaked pictures to concept cars. I have watched every review, looked it over, seen an acquaintance take off in the thing (herd it and its nice). When I first started hearing rumors that they were planning on launching the car under the Infinity brand and gearing it to a more expensive (and comfortable) market, I knew what was going to happen, and it did. I have been soaking all of it in. My topic in this thread was not about me being completely ignorant about the Nissan world, it was about not knowing how much tec the gtr shared with the newer Z cars. Like if the motors were the same block after all is striped away, and now I know they are, the shape of all the under-pinnings, now I know that stuff is a bit different. After reading everything Nissan over the past god knows how long and hearing that the 350z was being used as a test bed for the new GTR I wanted to know what else they shared. This is because of a progression I saw; 350z - 350z with more power and rumors that the engine internals were r&d for a new GTR - a 370z that now had more power and a bigger motor - the G35x and G37x - witch looked to me like the z cars (with all weal drive for the most part) And now we get a 3.8v6 (now I know, with the same motor just beefed up). So that's were I am coming from. I know about the watering down, I do not understand why our government puts the car industry in such a position where a car company needs to base its build decisions on a market not on "this is what we offer". I was so excited when I herd GM was going to fall and so horrified that we were not going to let it happen. I'm tired of getting cars that should have been so much better.
|
neobluepill

Offline
23 posts
1997 240sx sr bk, n' a 32
upstate ny
11-25-2004
|
| « Re: (AZhitman) | 6:15 AM 10/28/2009 |
|
I will go drive one then. I will let you know when I do, but I know what I'm going to say. Its was sick, unreal, a monster. That is the same thing I said after I drove my E36 to the BMW dealership and got the v8 m3 up past a 100 on some twisty roads. Now I will be driving my R32 to a Nissan dealer and doing the same thing. Ill tell you what, I would put money on the fact that the same will happen on the way home after driving the new gtr as did what happened with the new M3. Ill get back in my car, take a windy road home and say wow this thing really cant compare with the speed and handling of the new one, but Its just so much better; its a drivers car.
|
AZhitman
CEO

Offline
49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002
|
It'll make your E36 feel like a VW Bus.  But you have to drive it WAY beyond what you think it can handle. Even the Nissan Factory Driver that I rode in it with said it's hard to push it to its limits, because we're hard-wired not to trust the electronics. BTW, we were holding a conversation at normal volume, with the windows down, at 135mph.
|
Rare_f8

Offline
2238 posts
1990 300zx 2+2
Rapid City SD
10-7-2007
|
| « Re: (AZhitman) | 11:07 PM 10/28/2009 |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjXgKg358ZENice example how the both tuned R34 and R35. The R34 with the lead could not shake the R35. Only downfall for the R35 the tranny. Quite franky. I don't care. This is the first time Nissan marketed the rear tranny. Like all firsts, it's not perfect. And second MCR took the car out of the design parameters of the tranny. Nissan will get better and us, enthusiast will gather better knowledge of how to deal with the weak links. History has proven to repeat itself.
|
Gold Digger
RB/Skyline Moderator

Online
5850 posts
1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec Midnight Purple 50cc Honda Zoomer
Somewhere across the pond
4-11-2004
|
| « Re: (Rare_f8) | 4:47 PM 10/29/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by Rare_f8 » | | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjXgKg358ZE Nice example how the both tuned R34 and R35. The R34 with the lead could not shake the R35. Only downfall for the R35 the tranny. Quite franky. I don't care. This is the first time Nissan marketed the rear tranny. Like all firsts, it's not perfect. And second MCR took the car out of the design parameters of the tranny. Nissan will get better and us, enthusiast will gather better knowledge of how to deal with the weak links. History has proven to repeat itself. |
I have seen MCR's shop and that very GT-R. Three weeks ago, actually. The shop is about a 10 minute drive from my house, located near a karaoke place here in Yashio.
There is a little dude that works there, and when I took a few friends over there he explained that all the carbon fibre trim that was on the car (front lip, side skirts rear diffuser) was made in-house, by him. And it was wet carbon. Didn't see that particular R34, but there was the red one, and a few other...well, many other...R32, R33 and R34 parts cars just sitting behind the shop.
|
Rare_f8

Offline
2238 posts
1990 300zx 2+2
Rapid City SD
10-7-2007
|
| « Re: (Gold Digger) | 9:29 PM 10/29/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by Gold Digger » | I have seen MCR's shop and that very GT-R. Three weeks ago, actually. The shop is about a 10 minute drive from my house, located near a karaoke place here in Yashio. |
It's a small world after all. Props to the guy who made the wet carbon (heard it's fun to deal with). It be nice to have some tuning guys near here or at least not drag car mindset all the time. Best, I get is when I message MJR.
|
Mettler
VH Moderator

Offline
1362 posts
HR31 GTS-8 coupe, VH41/45 Hybrid Transplant
Hamilton
1-15-2006
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (akwikz) | 2:50 AM 11/2/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by akwikz » | | Here is all you really need to know: 1. The "GT-R" has always been, and will always be, the flagship of the Nissan line. | Orly?
Nissan VH V8 > your preferred engine.
|
Rare_f8

Offline
2238 posts
1990 300zx 2+2
Rapid City SD
10-7-2007
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (Mettler) | 6:18 AM 11/2/2009 |
|
R390 doesn't count. Even when the Lemans changed their homologous rules Nissan gave up on it. Nissan on made 2 production vehicles, one kept to themselves.But to credit the R390... it's technology went into both the Z32 and the R32.
|
REDWINTERZ

Offline
367 posts
1994 Nissan 300ZX (Aztec Red with Black Leather)
Fresno CA
8-19-2009
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (Mettler) | 11:17 PM 11/2/2009 |
|
I stumbled on this forum... Got lost on my way to the Z32 section Are the headlights of the R390 the same as the Z32?
Ricers down, Z's up | Quote, originally posted by fairladyzz » | | Once Upon a Time....Fast and the Furious came out..and we have a crap load of honda civics with fart cans on the street..and we didn't live happily ever after, the End |
Proud Member of the 'Not Completely Stupid and Riced-Out' High School Z32 Owners Club
|
jbracy7

Offline
367 posts
a shipping crate of parts FOR NOW!
SAINT LOUIS MO
1-13-2007
|
| « Re: (AZhitman) | 11:56 PM 11/2/2009 |
|
ive driven one. not a track or any thing . just around the lot when i was detailing one. never got over 6 mph. i was so fu**ing excited that i drove one.i was high on gtr for weeks

|
jbracy7

Offline
367 posts
a shipping crate of parts FOR NOW!
SAINT LOUIS MO
1-13-2007
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (REDWINTERZ) | 12:01 AM 11/3/2009 |
|
i dont think any one knows in person they look bigger than z32's
|
Gold Digger
RB/Skyline Moderator

Online
5850 posts
1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec Midnight Purple 50cc Honda Zoomer
Somewhere across the pond
4-11-2004
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (jbracy7) | 12:48 AM 11/3/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by jbracy7 » | | i dont think any one knows in person they look bigger than z32's |
My R33 V-Spec is bigger than a Z32...
|
Mettler
VH Moderator

Offline
1362 posts
HR31 GTS-8 coupe, VH41/45 Hybrid Transplant
Hamilton
1-15-2006
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (Rare_f8) | 2:53 AM 11/3/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by Rare_f8 » | | R390 doesn't count. Even when the Lemans changed their homologous rules Nissan gave up on it. Nissan on made 2 production vehicles, one kept to themselves. But to credit the R390... it's technology went into both the Z32 and the R32. | Yeah and now Nissan V8 engine swaps are proving to be the ultimate conversion within the Nissan family 
|
Rare_f8

Offline
2238 posts
1990 300zx 2+2
Rapid City SD
10-7-2007
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (Mettler) | 3:39 PM 11/3/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by Mettler » | Yeah and now Nissan V8 engine swaps are proving to be the ultimate conversion within the Nissan family  |
yeah, if I ever get my hands on a VK56, I'm going to do some really really dirty things to it.
|
Mettler
VH Moderator

Offline
1362 posts
HR31 GTS-8 coupe, VH41/45 Hybrid Transplant
Hamilton
1-15-2006
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (Rare_f8) | 5:59 PM 11/3/2009 |
|
What, like drop it in a Datsun 510 to create the ultimate deathmachine? | Quote, originally posted by Rare_f8 » | | But to credit the R390... it's technology went into both the Z32 and the R32. | P.S. the R390 came out in 1997/1998, Z32 and R32 in 1989. You could say the R390 was the culmination of Nissan's best racing technology at the time!
|
Rare_f8

Offline
2238 posts
1990 300zx 2+2
Rapid City SD
10-7-2007
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (Mettler) | 6:24 PM 11/3/2009 |
|
Doesn't matter, any car would be lighter than the Titan and it will be down right gnarly... | Quote, originally posted by Mettler » | P.S. the R390 came out in 1997/1998, Z32 and R32 in 1989. You could say the R390 was the culmination of Nissan's best racing technology at the time! |
Touche.
|
Rare_f8

Offline
2238 posts
1990 300zx 2+2
Rapid City SD
10-7-2007
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (Rare_f8) | 9:55 AM 11/4/2009 |
|
Some reason it was stuck in my mind the R390 was first, not the spawn of the R32 and Z32 ... and in a way the Q45..
|
neobluepill

Offline
23 posts
1997 240sx sr bk, n' a 32
upstate ny
11-25-2004
|
| « Re: (AZhitman) | 6:12 PM 11/14/2009 |
|
I feel like the skyline gives you that feel, at least the 1st few times driving the thing, is the "35" that much more noticeably a deifier of physics? How much quieter is the 35 then the 32? Does it justify the 2 tons?
| Quote, originally posted by AZhitman » | It'll make your E36 feel like a VW Bus.  But you have to drive it WAY beyond what you think it can handle. Even the Nissan Factory Driver that I rode in it with said it's hard to push it to its limits, because we're hard-wired not to trust the electronics. BTW, we were holding a conversation at normal volume, with the windows down, at 135mph. |
|
neobluepill

Offline
23 posts
1997 240sx sr bk, n' a 32
upstate ny
11-25-2004
|
| « Re: (Rare_f8) | 6:15 PM 11/14/2009 |
|
Thank you for that point of view.
| Quote, originally posted by Rare_f8 » | | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjXgKg358ZE Nice example how the both tuned R34 and R35. The R34 with the lead could not shake the R35. Only downfall for the R35 the tranny. Quite franky. I don't care. This is the first time Nissan marketed the rear tranny. Like all firsts, it's not perfect. And second MCR took the car out of the design parameters of the tranny. Nissan will get better and us, enthusiast will gather better knowledge of how to deal with the weak links. History has proven to repeat itself. |
|
neobluepill

Offline
23 posts
1997 240sx sr bk, n' a 32
upstate ny
11-25-2004
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (Gold Digger) | 6:54 PM 11/14/2009 |
|
That was another reason that the 35 bothered me. From what I have herd, the 32 was liked in size and weight, the 33 was a bit bulky, so when they made the 34 they went back to the recipe that everyone liked. If thats true, why the size and the weight of the 35? I would have thought Nissan would learn from a lesson. Is it that the marketing department over at Nissan knew that the people buying them wouldn't care? What do you guys think?
| Quote, originally posted by Gold Digger » | My R33 V-Spec is bigger than a Z32... |
|
Rare_f8

Offline
2238 posts
1990 300zx 2+2
Rapid City SD
10-7-2007
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (neobluepill) | 7:54 PM 11/14/2009 |
|
It's size is adequate. It's very chassis is being used in GT500 competitions and it has been winning. As a matter fact, the track width on the GT car has been increased. Nissan isn't trying to make the Shelby Cobra... it's making GT class cars.. and none that they came out with have been exactly the lightest or compact. Finally, the R32 is still the lightest and smaller of the GTR's.There isn't a lesson. Only optimization in car design. Each time it's better in it's own way. Just like the 350z and the 370z.
|
Count Zero

Offline
354 posts
1990 Skyline GT-R, Federal Legal & fully registered.
St. Louis MO
11-23-2006
|
| « Re: (neobluepill) | 11:19 PM 11/14/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by neobluepill » | Wow you are good with the typing skills. I voiced my opinion, to see what people had to say, start a debate, gain some knowledge.
|
No you didn't. You came in here to rant like a 2 year old and hoped that someone would back you up so you could feel good about yourself.If you truly cared about "gain some knowledge" you could easily have done it on your own. You'd typically have been labeled a troll, but you're not clever enough for that, I don't think.
| Quote » | | I am typing from America, not sure where you are but hear speech is free(so i did it). |
Something that someone I know once said way back in the Usenet days: "Before expressing your right to free speech, you really should have something worth saying first. Sadly, you don't."
| Quote » | | And to say that you would enjoy seeing me get into a car accident because I was mis-informed, or have bad typing skills is the dumbest thing I have herd. Were all on hear to talk about what we love; no??? |
No, the comment about enjoying seeing you DIAF had nothing to do with what you do or don't know. It's that you present yourself as a moron with a childish attitude.
1990 Skyline GT-R (Mostly stock), 2000 F150 (almost bone stock), 1988 Mustang track car (not stock at all), 2008 Harley Softail NightTrain (also not stock)"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body. The goal is to skid in broadside; tires smoking, body all dented, leaking fluids, the fuel gauge just about on empty, thoroughly used up and worn out, and loudly proclaiming---- "Holy ****---What a Ride!"
|
AZhitman
CEO

Offline
49838 posts
03 G35C s/c, 93 S13 Vert KA-T, 09 Cube, 72 240Z RB25, 63 NL320, 67 WRL411, 67.5 SPL311, 05 Frontier
Phx, AZ
4-29-2002
|
| « Re: (neobluepill) | 12:51 AM 11/15/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by neobluepill » | | I feel like the skyline gives you that feel, at least the 1st few times driving the thing, is the "35" that much more noticeably a deifier of physics? How much quieter is the 35 then the 32? Does it justify the 2 tons?
|
Dude, they aren't even in the same class. You're talking about a car that set lap records on The 'Ring. No car defies the laws of physics. Not even a GTR. "Quieter" is relative and impossible to quantify without controls in place and measuring equipment. Two tons? Who cares. It'll spank all prior GT-R iterations, so who cares how much it weighs? Seriously, I still don't understand what you're getting at.
|
Gold Digger
RB/Skyline Moderator

Online
5850 posts
1995 Nissan Skyline GT-R V-Spec Midnight Purple 50cc Honda Zoomer
Somewhere across the pond
4-11-2004
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (neobluepill) | 7:24 PM 11/15/2009 |
|
| Quote, originally posted by neobluepill » | That was another reason that the 35 bothered me. From what I have herd, the 32 was liked in size and weight, the 33 was a bit bulky, so when they made the 34 they went back to the recipe that everyone liked. If thats true, why the size and the weight of the 35? I would have thought Nissan would learn from a lesson. Is it that the marketing department over at Nissan knew that the people buying them wouldn't care? What do you guys think?
|
A common misconception of the R33 was that it was "so much heavier" than the 32 and the 34. In all reality, the BCNR33 GT-R was only 200lbs heavier, due mostly to its longer and wider body. The back seat has more legroom than the previous and succeding GT-Rs. It was only rated at 280 due to the Gentleman's agreement, but was closer to the 315 mark, according to an employee of Nissan who is a friend of mine. The R33 didn't have any problems moving that much weight around. And, the R33 was the first production car to lap the Nuremburg ring in under 8 minutes. I don't think the R34 did that. But, that isn't really relative to your post. The R35 is a bigger car, yes. But, it's only 400lbs heavier than an R33. With 500hp sitting in the engine bay, that's not a whole lot of weight to worry about.
|
neobluepill

Offline
23 posts
1997 240sx sr bk, n' a 32
upstate ny
11-25-2004
|
| « Re: The R36 GTR (Gold Digger) | 7:41 AM 11/22/2009 |
|
It seems to me that the addition of some extra weight may have helped with high speed stability issues. That wouldn't surprise me a whole lot, it seems like its been the case with the m3 and the ctsv. I think doing that will change a cars handling characteristics drastically and i am not a fan of the end result. With the extra weight, I think car manufacturers need to try and hide it. By way of easier power power steering and such. As of late, I find less and less your really put into the car, and more like telling a car what to do. Maybe its progress in the industry, but honestly, who hear after work gets in there car for a joy ride and gets to go over 120mph for any length of time? I like opening my cars up, however something that doesn't give you good feel at safe limits on the road is not very fun for me. | Quote, originally posted by Gold Digger » | A common misconception of the R33 was that it was "so much heavier" than the 32 and the 34. In all reality, the BCNR33 GT-R was only 200lbs heavier, due mostly to its longer and wider body. The back seat has more legroom than the previous and succeding GT-Rs. It was only rated at 280 due to the Gentleman's agreement, but was closer to the 315 mark, according to an employee of Nissan who is a friend of mine. The R33 didn't have any problems moving that much weight around. And, the R33 was the first production car to lap the Nuremburg ring in under 8 minutes. I don't think the R34 did that. But, that isn't really relative to your post. The R35 is a bigger car, yes. But, it's only 400lbs heavier than an R33. With 500hp sitting in the engine bay, that's not a whole lot of weight to worry about. |
|
| First < 1 2 Last |