For those NA guys with 3" exhaust

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
9240sx
Posts: 2676
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 4:06 am
Car: What i believe to be the cleanest s13 in the world.

SR20DET + RS*R-Apexi-Nismo-Trust-HKS= 100% pure love
Location: New Mexico

Post



http://www.team-integra.net/se...ID=47

Found this artical,Thought it made alot of sense...


User avatar
AmoebAssassin
Posts: 2424
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 7:11 am
Car: 1991 Base fastback 5spd, black

Post

That article has no basis in any sort of intelligent science, and I hope whoever wrote that gets slapped in the face in the near future.

User avatar
daconkiftador
Posts: 2595
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:27 pm
Car: '92 Coupe SE, '83 Rabbit GTi, '91 Golf GTi

Post

^^

TrunkMonkey
Posts: 3190
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 7:48 am
Car: 2000 Lincoln Navigator

Post

my 3g eclipse's stock exhaust system is roughly 2-2.25".

it's restrictive as hell.

-demetrius

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

I don't see what the fuss is. N/A w/ 3 inch exhaust is pointless. Sometimes even harmful. Do not do.

User avatar
JustinStrife
Posts: 5120
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 10:13 pm
Car: '99 FRC. 402, Vortech T-Trim @ 12psi = 706rwhp/621rwtq
Contact:

Post

redtop91 wrote:I don't see what the fuss is. N/A w/ 3 inch exhaust is pointless. Sometimes even harmful. Do not do.
You're right. Just like swapping other motors in our cars is harmful too.

A 3" full exhaust WILL net you more power than a 2.5" exhaust, at least on an engine with ANY kind of displacement like the KA motor. It won't be much, but the only negative it gives, is more noise. In which case a turbo fixes that nicely.

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

If an exhausts diameter is too large for the pulses the motor is putting out it will increase escape volume but dramatically decrease velocity. It is not too hard to grasp.

Edit: Maybe for some it is

User avatar
BadMojo
Posts: 3946
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:17 pm
Car: 2007 Mazdaspeed 3

Post

redtop91 wrote:If an exhausts diameter is too large for the pulses the motor is putting out it will increase escape volume but dramatically decrease velocity. It is not too hard to grasp.

Edit: Maybe for some it is
I've never seen a dyno graph on a NA KA showing that a 3" exhaust is big enough to decrease the velocity of exhaust gas to the point where scavenging is effected and power is lost.

Dunno...I was a history major in college. Either they didn't teach us fluid dynamics or I was sleeping in that day. Still, I've never seen a dyno show that 3" exhaust will cause any problems on a KA, and I've never seen anyone complain about noticeable loss of power at any RPM's.

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

I definitely misspoke. 3 inch won't do any damage. I'm thinking of another thread where a guy was talking about a 4 inch exhaust.

nametakennow
Posts: 10024
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 4:14 pm
Car: '06 MINI Cooper S

Post

Having too big of an exhaust is more a pointless nuisance than some dramatic harm.

Furthermore, if the primaries on the header are still the same size, then the size of the exhaust piping is pretty much moot. Having giant primaries and/or having no header would destroy the scavenging effect, but having giant piping after that point is merely silly.

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

Man I haven't seen that "article" in a while, always good for a chuckle...

User avatar
sicride
Posts: 483
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 7:59 am
Car: 1989 KA24ET RPS13

Post

just like 4-1 headers vs. 4-2-1 headers. I see a 3" exhaust hurting low end torque and improving top end hp. But both only being minimal so go for the sound you desire.

RB20DETodd
Posts: 3763
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:30 pm
Car: 92 Nissan S13 coupe SE RB20DET

Post

redtop91 wrote:I don't see what the fuss is. N/A w/ 3 inch exhaust is pointless. Sometimes even harmful. Do not do.
there excuse is

Ho one day i stay turbo, but for now ill annoy the hell out of everyone and look like a ricer.

User avatar
alms24sebring
Posts: 7332
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:18 am
Car: '97 Nissan 240sx. First Nissan. First love. Sold.
'04 Nissan Sentra SER SpecV
Location: Alexandria VA

Post

its true, bigger is not always better, theres a limit.

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

^^

User avatar
ddgsxr504
Posts: 6024
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:50 pm
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX SE 2007 Infinit M35 Sport 2011 Nissan Pathfinder Silver Edition
Location: The real SoCal

Post

While this discussion has been beat to death....

NA/KA motors have shown no loss using 3inch over 2.5inch on dynos.

KA's have more displacement than the Honda motors the author is clearly refrencing which negates the whole theory behind his entire article.

Most of us go with 3 inch because we plan on going turbo later, how many 1.6/1.8 litre Honda guys can say that, no use in buying 2 exhausts.

RB20DETodd
Posts: 3763
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 10:30 pm
Car: 92 Nissan S13 coupe SE RB20DET

Post

ddgsxr504 wrote:
Most of us go with 3 inch because we plan on going turbo later
OH

SNAP!

User avatar
E7-S14
Posts: 5214
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:20 pm
Car: ess 14 foo!
Contact:

Post

I got a 3 inch exhaust and i love it... i dont feel any loss in power either and this guy is most likly refrencing to a Honda motor.. and not KA.. It makes sense.. but its fact that all motors arnt created equally

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

Right. NA Honda motors > NA KA

OMG Seva has spoken!

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

redtop91 wrote:Right. stock N/A Honda motors > pretty much any stock NA 4 banger sold in america
(and stop with the whole slash thing, it's not "Naturally/Aspirated" )

User avatar
JustinStrife
Posts: 5120
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 10:13 pm
Car: '99 FRC. 402, Vortech T-Trim @ 12psi = 706rwhp/621rwtq
Contact:

Post

redtop91 wrote:I definitely misspoke. 3 inch won't do any damage. I'm thinking of another thread where a guy was talking about a 4 inch exhaust.
Glad we got that straightened out.

I've owned 3 240sx's, 2 have had BRM, and one has had an HKS Hi-Power. I've also run the KAE, KADE, and the SR20. I think I know a little bit of what I'm talking about.

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

JustinStrife wrote:I think I know a little bit of what I'm talking about.
LOL maybe just a little.

User avatar
Red coupe
Posts: 12216
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 6:51 pm
Car: 92 Nissan 240sx Coupe

Post

You can indefinitely go to big, and Im sure all this theory comes into play but.....Reality is more important....I haven't looked into much but in most cases don't dynos show gains with 3"? Dyno > 1 page article on the basics of exhaust theory.

R6_240sx
Posts: 7419
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:40 pm
Car: 1997 240SX LE, 2004 YZF-R6, 1980 Celica GT

Post

redtop91 wrote:I definitely misspoke. 3 inch won't do any damage. I'm thinking of another thread where a guy was talking about a 4 inch exhaust.
Pics of the 4 inch... exhaust, or

User avatar
Looneybomber
Posts: 9140
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 3:05 pm
Car: 02 explorer sprt (grn)
10 G37S (white)

Post

The F20c is only 2.0L, but the s2k guys swear by the 70mm (2.76") single as opposed to the 63mm (2.48") single. No need for 3" on that car, there's not enough displacement to need it.

scotttak
Posts: 738
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:30 pm
Car: 2018 Camaro ZL1
Contact:

Post

i would think the 2.75 is better for the s2k is because it hits its power high in the rpms so thats what they go for, more top end.

User avatar
AmoebAssassin
Posts: 2424
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 7:11 am
Car: 1991 Base fastback 5spd, black

Post

Oh my god, are we still arguing about this?

Please, please, please, do not give in to random internet speculation! Go with what works, and 3" definitely works on a KA.

User avatar
ddgsxr504
Posts: 6024
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:50 pm
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX SE 2007 Infinit M35 Sport 2011 Nissan Pathfinder Silver Edition
Location: The real SoCal

Post

AmoebAssassin wrote:Oh my god, are we still arguing about this?

Please, please, please, do not give in to random internet speculation! Go with what works, and 3" definitely works on a KA.
What... WWHHAAATTTT!!!!

True True.

thekage
Posts: 2277
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 1:51 pm
Car: 98 Dodge Caravan
98 Dodge Intrepid

Post

doushbag wrote:This is called valve overlap and is necessary for high revving engines such as Integras


last time I checked I didn't drive an integra or a high revving engine. The KA is definitely neither of those things.

User avatar
ddgsxr504
Posts: 6024
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:50 pm
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX SE 2007 Infinit M35 Sport 2011 Nissan Pathfinder Silver Edition
Location: The real SoCal

Post

it's douche not doush but either way touche'!


Return to “General Chat”