well, you're right. hate is a strong word... but i dislike it terribly. and how nissan salesmen try to push it when i go to pick up parts. "hey you wanna see the new gtr?!" and then you start asking for specs and they start stumbling. i think they could have done a lot better. sorry but for 90k c'mon now.GOnissanTOM wrote:I don't HATE the car, I just think they could have done a little better, I mean its an awsome ride, but some of the undercar parts they borrowed from the Murano. A real manual would have been nice. Its a fast car, they just need to work out some kinks in it.
Actually,.....GOnissanTOM wrote:Transmission needs reprogrammed!!! Too many launches!!!! hahaha. The company was pushing it because they race it, they are shipping it to Germany for a race in two weeks. So they were like"We don't care what it costs, just fix it" So here is a pic of the very first broken GTR!!!
I win
yeah, one is because of the lack of ability of the driver, the other one is just nissans faultGOnissanTOM wrote:thats wrecked. this is BROKE.
How many years does Nissan plan on running production of this car?SteveTheTech wrote:Come on though you guys have to know that Nissan always takes at least a year to figure out there bugs. I can only imagine the GT-R is the same damn way, just when it fails someone is going to going to be pretty pis*ed.
I too have coveted this car since the Top Gear bit, and after seeing several at a Nissan training center I still want one but the maintenance costs are astronomical and the people who would be able to afford one will not be pleased with Nissans' service as it is not quite a Lambo dealer.
PapaSmurf2k3 wrote: Take some pics of the underside. I wanna see how the suspension arms look, among other things.
I said years... You said they will fix these problems over the years, but the car wont be in production for too many....SteveTheTech wrote:I have not been able to find a number rumblings are ~45K, but you can't hold me to that I am really unsure. They say limited production.
SteveTheTech wrote:two maybe three depending on the public perception I would assume.
So in other words the very last GTR to roll of the production line should work pretty well?SteveTheTech wrote:Come on though you guys have to know that Nissan always takes at least a year to figure out there bugs. I can only imagine the GT-R is the same damn way, just when it fails someone is going to going to be pretty pis*ed.
HahahahahahaB-Metts wrote:
yeah, one is because of the lack of ability of the driver, the other one is just nissans fault
Well... yes.cars < $100K shouldn't come with options that the car cannot handle...FlatBlackIan wrote:would you rather Nissan had just left out the launch control option?
I cant think of a single twin clutch car that can handle it, $100K + or not.Red coupe wrote:
Well... yes.cars < $100K shouldn't come with options that the car cannot handle...
didn't say they should be able to handle it... I said if they cant handle it it shouldn't come as a feature.FlatBlackIan wrote:
I cant think of a single twin clutch car that can handle it, $100K + or not.
I thought we determined they don't get replaced, they get "consulted" so they work again.Rand0m0sityxX wrote:=/
They can only handle 14 launches before having to be replaced..
PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:
I thought we determined they don't get replaced, they get "consulted" so they work again.
Still, it seems like a control module should be able to do that on its own.
There is no reason why you can't build a transmission to handle that kind of power. It might be expensive as hell, but you can do it.
PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:oops sorry, I'm getting my threads mixed.
In another thread that Tom posted in, he said in order to fix the shifting issue that they were having, they had to plug in the consult 3 and make an adjustment. He didn't say anything about swapping trannies or clutches or anything physical.
Soooo, the transmission doesn't "Blow".