niscort wrote:the irony is the are no "options"
Incorrect.
niscort wrote:.. other than an externally driven pump with a dry sump, tank etc, equaling thousands of dollars of gear required to build such a system...
There you go , you just listed the option. And no, it doesnt equal to thousands of dollars at all, unless your a n00b, just love the bling and want to impress your mates, or do it because it needs to be done (i fall into the third eg).
If you look about on ebay, there are used Barnes, Peterson (these two are the Veyron's of dry sump pumps) and then you have superb pumps like Moroso, Stefs ect, what have a lot f options etc etc. You then have tanks, also you can get for much cheaper, even OBX is now making China tanks (but they are too small in size for my liking) so building a system is far from "thousands of dollars", unless you want it to be.
The beauty of say the moroso (if your on a budget), is also a large number of pulleys, and choice of drive system. And fact is that even if it were a couple grand, thats the cost of a good turbo. Im confused when it comes to this ?. We spend money on overseas AN made fittings, big turbos, custom builds, but we mumble quietly when it gets to ... "oem pump".
The other beauty of this setup is that the CA is known for head drainage issues, and its also common for high rpm. With a 3 or 4 stage dry pump, it will scavenge and make a considerable amount of crankcase vac, something that actually seals rings, makes hp , free's up hp, and gets the oil back down by stopping upwards drafts of air.
In any high perf motor, you want crankcase vac, but you dont want the OEM PCV system. So your getting a reliable and serviceable oil system that wont let you down, getting as a free side effect crankcase vac that you otherwise would have paid big bux for on its own (vac pump), the ability to sit the motor lower (always good), ... with only a drawback. AC system goes. I guess if you really wanted tho there are ways of keeping it and relocating the pump, but where the AC comp sits, thats optimal.
niscort wrote:maybe he is confusing himself with the variety of options available for the rb series of engines
Not confusing myself at all.
saf wrote:There are much much better alternatives. Dry sump.
Option 1 : Peterson (lots of pulleys, 2 drive systems)Option 2 : BarnesOption 3 : WeissOption 4 : Moroso ....
You get the pic. In the end, its entirely your choice. Irony is i had this convo with my local Vi-Pec (ex Autronic) dealer who is probably the man when it comes to CA in Aus, and he agree'd that its a step backwards, building motors, big turbos, and OEM pumps when he has also seen them fail.
The choice ... is yours.