I would avoid the intel processors, get a AMD, I was reading a article lately about the development of both and the AMD pulls ahead in the tests even though the P4 is rated at a much faster speed. It is because of the "pipelines" in the processor that cause the 1.25 GHz Power PC G4(motorla) chip to be compertitive with the 2.5 P4.
The pipelines are the parth that data goes through while being processed by the comp. Longer pipelines are more open to hazard.
Quoted from some article that I was sent.
"Modern-day processors try to predict the next move of the applications and have gotten very good at doing so. However mispredicting the next move, while not common, does happen roughly 10 percent of the time."
"Chips typically realize their mistakes during the last quartar of the pipeline, so the longer the pipeline the longer it takes to flush the message from the pipeline and fix the problem. As a result, performance suffers."
AMD uses a 10 stage pipeline, compared to Intel's 20 stage. Motorla uses a 7 stage. AMD chips are usually cheaper
If you want a low end computer for budget for computers that will go through the web, play some games and do other basic useful things, the celeron(intel) will be good or the duron(amd). Iam currently using a celeron, it does decent. I plan to build me a new computer after I finish rebuilding my car, I want to use a athlon chip. I hope that info helps some, I will also need to find out the name of this magazine(I dont think its PC world) because they seem to be very, very intellgent and informative.