yes amother tomi cam question

Discuss topics related to the CA18DE and CA18DET series engines.
BQ.05.TD
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:48 pm
Car: ca pulsar

Post

i have been offered a set of 270 8.8mm cams at a good price but i dont know if there goin got be to big for wat i havebuilt ca etc with 2876r .64 rear that is soon to be sold for either 2871r or 3071r both with .64 rears

if any one has any idea wat there going to be like on the road plz let me know.
Modified by BQ.05.TD at 5:11 AM 4/4/2010


User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

The duration is slightly lopey but not unstreetable. With the 3071 i think they would work real nice.

User avatar
NUT-CSE
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:59 pm
Car: 1988 Nissan Exa

Post

A mate has them in his exa and they seem very peaky to me but he is running a GT3076R with a .82 turbine housing. Comes on hard at around 5000rpm but with a smaller turbo and rear housing they should be sweet.

dhessian
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:26 pm
Car: 240sx

Post

If you want your powerband situated in the upper RPM's they might work well. The question to ask though, is a .64 backside going to be the limiting factor in the upper RPM's where the cams are going to shine. On that note, with 270's I would spin minimum 8200rpm.

(ks13)

BQ.05.TD
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:48 pm
Car: ca pulsar

Post

on another note kelford cams make 260 9.0mm lift cams. i thought the bigest lift you could go on stock head was 8.8? typo or just pushing there luck as there about the same price but not to shore on them. yes i know its only .2mm but you never knowhttp://www.camshaftshop.co.nz/....html

the 270s sound nice but i think they will just be over kill on my set up and power goals and wat i want the car to drive like

meminto
Posts: 607
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:46 pm
Car: S13 Silvia CA18DECT

Post

The lift value itself is generally not the issue, it's the base circle diameter of the lobes...

8.8mm is the general rule of thumb using the standard base circle diameter lobes...

Once you go higher you start risking lobes hitting the reliefs without making the base circle diameter smaller, relative to the lift..

There is plenty of room in the chamber

BQ.05.TD
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:48 pm
Car: ca pulsar

Post

well when th motor got built the engine builder said i had s*** loads of room in the valve reliefs of the pistons for big cams if i ever wanted to put big cams in. so the 9mm lift should be ok yer. i just think 270 isnt going to match my set up all that well

croustibat
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:30 am
Car: 200sx S13 w/ ca18det

Post

i have a friend using tomei 260° 10.25 lift (with solid lifters) and a gt3071.

Freaking engine from 5000 to 9000 rpm ... dull under that. Having seen this i would never use 270 cams on a CA (i would rather use something like 254 or 256 in /260 ex, turbo engines seem to work best with a shorter intake duration)

see it there :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6xTbl3wLyQ


Return to “CA18DE / CA18DET Forum”