Founding member of Society for Prevention of Abuse of Q45.pito11213 wrote:Wow such encouragement.
Considering that a 94 is 3 years newer than the first Y33, your going to have more age related things, like suspension and brakes, but the actual drivetrain is as solid if not more solid... There are a LOT of "bad apples" out there as far as G50s go because they are so cheap compared to other Q45s... People buy them and maintain them like they're a 4000 car, not a 50k car....2tirefire wrote:I believe that all cars have problems, whether it be a Nissan, Toyota, or Acura. I believe it has a lot to do with the previous owner and how the maintnence was treated while in the previous owners hands. I guess I am wondering if there were any more majore reported problems with a G50 1994 to 1996 than a Y33. They seem to all have little quirks here and there, but the G50 does look a ton better to me than a Y33, and yes I am crazy. Opinions. Thanks
Of course we know you meant to say "3 years older than the first Y33". Haha, I honestly think the G50 is better. It was produced as a higher quality car than the Y33. What we need to explain is the lineage of both cars to their birthplace. The G50 Q45 came from well, the G50 Q45 in Japan which also shares the same chassis as the PHG50 President. The Y33 Q45 derived from the Y33 Cima which is a lower model than the Japan Q45, but is what Nissan decided to bring over as the "new Q" in the states. The Y33 was the only model to be given the mediocre chassis as the F50 Q45 went back to being the same F50 Q45 used in Japan (sharing the F50 President chassis) and not a lower model Cima chassis. The car is just a higher class car from the start.elwesso wrote:Considering that a 94 is 3 years newer than the first Y33, your going to have more age related things, like suspension and brakes, but the actual drivetrain is as solid if not more solid... There are a LOT of "bad apples" out there as far as G50s go because they are so cheap compared to other Q45s... People buy them and maintain them like they're a 4000 car, not a 50k car....
There are some "goofy" problems with G50s, but rarely (if ever) do they cause the car to be immobile or anything like that...
Well said. Volvo 240s, for instance, have a reputation for being solid and extremely reliable. "300,000+ mile cars." Mine was neglected before I got it, and it's been nothing but trouble. I've already paid more in maintainance and repairs than I paid for the car, and there's still no light at the end of the tunnel.2tirefire wrote:I believe that all cars have problems, whether it be a Nissan, Toyota, or Acura. I believe it has a lot to do with the previous owner and how the maintnence was treated while in the previous owners hands. I guess I am wondering if there were any more majore reported problems with a G50 1994 to 1996 than a Y33. They seem to all have little quirks here and there, but the G50 does look a ton better to me than a Y33, and yes I am crazy. Opinions. Thanks
Wow... another brick fan. I just picked up a 93 240 recently. zerothread/208161 Suggest you ditch the troublemaker and get another..preferably a 93' as that's the last year they were made and incorporates the most improvements. Lemme know if you ever need anything... parts galore here in ATL.NHNissanFan85 wrote:Well said. Volvo 240s, for instance, have a reputation for being solid and extremely reliable. "300,000+ mile cars." Mine was neglected before I got it, and it's been nothing but trouble. I've already paid more in maintainance and repairs than I paid for the car, and there's still no light at the end of the tunnel.
Bottom line: if you treat your car like ****, it will treat you like ****.
Here Here I owned an '84 245Glt (wagon) "the tank" and '84 242Glt (2-door) "the bucket" Rock solid - 3 unfortunate accidents are the only reason I don't still have "the bucket"DrewQ45 wrote:
Wow... another brick fan. I just picked up a 93 240 recently. zerothread/208161 Suggest you ditch the troublemaker and get another..preferably a 93' as that's the last year they were made and incorporates the most improvements. Lemme know if you ever need anything... parts galore here in ATL.
WidebodyZ... that was the most eloquently, yet simply stated breakdown of the G-50 versus Y-33 I have seen on this forum. Thank for the clarity.
To answer the question of the original poster. G50 all the way baby!!!
You aren't on Turbobricks, by any chance, are you?Black stallion wrote:Here Here I owned an '84 245Glt (wagon) "the tank" and '84 242Glt (2-door) "the bucket" Rock solid - 3 unfortunate accidents are the only reason I don't still have "the bucket"