Would you do anything different, engine wise?

Discuss topics related to the CA18DE and CA18DET series engines.
Liquid_Neon
Posts: 690
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:06 pm
Car: 2000 Toyota Echo, 1988 Pulsar NX SE Turbo
Contact:

Post

ca18detgabby wrote:BAHAHAHA I nearly peed myself laughing when I read that. So many vac lines..........
HAHAHA, you think ur ca18det's vac lines are bad? most of them dont even have HALF the crap my stock ca18de had. 1988 US emmissions control = teh ghey!

All those diagrams ive seen posted round here lack a buncha the usdm ca vac lines. just chuckle to youself u didnt have to work with that like i did

OP: CA or RB FTW! boost kicks @$$. untuned (ca18de ecu), exhuast leaks, and slippin clutch still put me side by side with a 4.9 foxbody (5.sl0w ) till the higher speeds and the clutch slippage was jsut too bad. I love my CA!


User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

What specific information are you looking for that is not present. i would be happy to work on getting it up.


Return to “CA18DE / CA18DET Forum”