Would you dare say?

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
User avatar
sohc90adel
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:01 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx HB 5 speed Grey
Contact:

Post

Is there a 4 cylinder car faster than a 240sx, in the same price range as the s13's?


nissanrcer240
Posts: 1657
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 5:22 am
Car: 90 Nissan 240SX SR20DET
Contact:

Post

yes

User avatar
sohc90adel
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:01 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx HB 5 speed Grey
Contact:

Post

very funny!

TurboKA37
Posts: 2602
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 10:55 am
Contact:

Post

what do u expect with such a broad question? set some limits for us. how much money can u spend? what kind of condition can the car be in? what is ur definition of "fast"? straight line? in the turns? high speed stability?

User avatar
sohc90adel
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:01 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx HB 5 speed Grey
Contact:

Post

4,000 dollar range give or take 1000 dollars,

and a mix of turning and straightline.

92Talon4evr
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 5:45 am

Post

yeah...buy a 1G dsm, lower it, buy strut and sway bars....a big 16g turbo and an exhaust and you'll have a car that runs low 13's to high 12's all day at the track and is fun as hell to autocross

Cyberkreig
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 4:40 pm
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX SR
Contact:

Post

Not only would that cost far more than the average S13, it would be far less reliable.

Edit: Sorry for the dsm reliablity slam.. but seriously.. That is typical DSM mentality.. "take on of these here, strap that there turbo on.." Who needs to spend money on proper tuning? Not DSM owners apparently.

User avatar
sohc90adel
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:01 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx HB 5 speed Grey
Contact:

Post

so there are no cars faster huh?

TurboKA37
Posts: 2602
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 10:55 am
Contact:

Post

RX7s are a popular comparison to the s13 and i wouldnt mind a mr2 turbo

User avatar
sohc90adel
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:01 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx HB 5 speed Grey
Contact:

Post

mr2 turbos are way more expensive! rx7 would be nice but what year?dont rx7 engines burnt out soon?

TurboKA37
Posts: 2602
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 10:55 am
Contact:

Post

ive never taken the time to do some research on the rx7 or mr2 turbo. im talkin bout the late 80s to 91 i believe rx7 and i knew the mr2 turbo would be more expensive im just saying i wouldnt mind having one

User avatar
sohc90adel
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:01 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx HB 5 speed Grey
Contact:

Post

i wouldnt mind either, i would love the 88 89 supercharged mr2, the non supercharged mr2 are pretty quick, i can only imagine the supercharged one.

User avatar
Zero-s13
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 3:47 pm
Car: driving canyons, playing video games and taking care of my reptiles

Post

The fc rx7 (2nd generation) are really fast cars and can be reliable if you know how to take car of a rotory engine. I have seen some last as much as 200k miles on it, but some as short as 125k. It all depends on how you use it. But get some nice air flow mods on one (i.h.e.) and you will have one fast car that is similar to an s13. But in regards to your statement about a 4 cylinder being faster, the rx7 is not the one seeing how it doesn't have any cylinders at all. -Jeromy

APEXi240
Posts: 1929
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2002 8:52 am
Car: 08 Nissan Versa S hatch
Contact:

Post

RX-7 is not 4 clylinder.

Talon/Eclipse is faster, regardless of bolt-ons or not. Reliability was not part of the question.Supercharger MR-2Conquest/StarionTurbo Chrylser/Plymouth

I thought the thread was going to be something funny, like "would you dare say...I hope you die, I hope your car blows up, ect."

User avatar
sohc90adel
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:01 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx HB 5 speed Grey
Contact:

Post

very true good point, so..... mr2 thats it?

User avatar
sohc90adel
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2003 3:01 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 240sx HB 5 speed Grey
Contact:

Post

whats the horspower on those cars?

APEXi240
Posts: 1929
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2002 8:52 am
Car: 08 Nissan Versa S hatch
Contact:

Post

DSM is 215.Conquest and Starion were around 175...I'm not positive though.The turbo Daytona came in different trims...175, and 205 I believe.There is also the turbo Probe, which was 205 I believe.

I forgot the exact number and am too lazy to look them up, but that is around what they are.

BuudWeizErr
Posts: 4745
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2002 11:35 am

Post

Starions are tight. My moms boyfriend had one that I drove. It was more of a dog than my SR, but when boost hit, it was fun.

If I had actual mechanical skills, time and money, I would build up a starion, but meh, too much work.

Wuss
Posts: 277
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:11 am
Contact:

Post

Am I missing something? The original post asked are there 4 cylinder cars faster then a 240sx, in the same price range?

240sx? meaning KA? I'm sorry, but the KA is a dog no matter how you mod it naturally aspirated. So the question that question is, yes, there are many 4 cylinder cars faster then a 240sx.

Now when you put turbos into the equation, that means you're spending that much more money. But drop 4k into boosting a cheap VW GTI 16v mk1-mk2, and you have yourself a 13-12 second car.

So for that price, the answer is still yes, there are many 4 cylinder cars faster then a 240.

So the general answer yes, there are many many cars , just as cheap, that is as fast or faster than a 240sx.

Now handling, this has to be teh cheapest car ever with this kind of handling capability. Having a blast ever since I bought the car. :)

nissanrcer240
Posts: 1657
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 5:22 am
Car: 90 Nissan 240SX SR20DET
Contact:

Post

Wuss wrote:Am I missing something? The original post asked are there 4 cylinder cars faster then a 240sx, in the same price range?

240sx? meaning KA? I'm sorry, but the KA is a dog no matter how you mod it naturally aspirated. So the question that question is, yes, there are many 4 cylinder cars faster then a 240sx.

Now when you put turbos into the equation, that means you're spending that much more money. But drop 4k into boosting a cheap VW GTI 16v mk1-mk2, and you have yourself a 13-12 second car.

So for that price, the answer is still yes, there are many 4 cylinder cars faster then a 240.

So the general answer yes, there are many many cars , just as cheap, that is as fast or faster than a 240sx.

Now handling, this has to be teh cheapest car ever with this kind of handling capability. Having a blast ever since I bought the car. :)


like i said, yes :)

User avatar
240SXedUp
Posts: 1639
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 6:11 pm

Post

old 92ish Celica Alltrac turbo

Antyoo
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 4:06 pm
Car: R/C vehicles and Cars

Post

while most alltracs are more expensive, yes you can sometimes find one for as low as $2500 for the 5th gen.

even cheaper for the 4th gen alltrac.

factory turbo, toyota quality, and the traction of AWD

Rockenreno
Posts: 2891
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 5:48 pm
Car: 1997 BMW M3
Contact:

Post

you can get a worn out mid 90s mr2 turbo for under $5k, probably better in both handling and 1/4 mile time. I still prefer my 240sx though :)

JESTER
Posts: 3266
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2002 5:08 am
Car: 2004 Chevy Colorado Bright a** Red 3.5 five cylinder

Post

The 240sx s13 is not the end all of 4 cylinders. It's a good car, but lets not go over board. It can be made to be a great car. Fast, awsome handling. But the DSM's and RX7 (not a 4 cylinder but hey, the turbo II kicks butt).

You could pick up an older model Impreza for cheap. They dont have as much horse power, but like the other poster said, AWD kicks serios butt. And Subaru's quality IMO is right there with Toyota.

User avatar
krazy skwerel
Posts: 4488
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2003 7:48 pm
Car: 1989 240SX Coupe down for the count
2005 Honda Accord
1974 Ford Mustang II
Location: Middle Tennessee
Contact:

Post

I just wanted to jump in and give props to the starion/ conquest. Awsome little cars. I've been looking to buy one for quite a while 176hp, 223 torque. 2.6 liter 4 cyl. is a huge 4cyl. and it has the turbo. Very nice car. It's too bad so many are junked out.

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

And the fact that they were absolute electrical nightmares...

Meantime
Posts: 1379
Joined: Thu May 08, 2003 3:51 am

Post

I'm a Starion fan as well...I've always liked the flared fenders and deep-dish factory rims on the later ones ('87-'88). Black Starion, black leather int, all shined up, = mean machine.

Finding one in good nick is nearly impossible, however, at least around my area. Almost every one I've seen has been modified (and not in a good way).

Subaru Alcyone (XT) is another competitor for the S13...4 cylinder turbo (some) and AWD (some)...but they are total dogs performance-wise and pretty much inferior to the S13 in all aspects, IMO.

Stuntman240
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 9:01 am
Car: 91 coupe

Post

dont diss the probe. its fast but highly unreliabe as a race/daily driver. go ka all the way. they fly if you know how to drive em.meaning go road racin', the 240 kicks *** on the track

User avatar
240SXedUp
Posts: 1639
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 6:11 pm

Post

Probes suck. You disproved yourself in your reply.

Stuntman240
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 9:01 am
Car: 91 coupe

Post

that was the point. the pos is still sittin in my driveway. does anyone want to blow it up 4 me?


Return to “240sx General Discussion”